没有首选医生的风险因素和结果:基于法国主要健康保险计划数据的横断面研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jérôme Tourasse, Annaëlle Testud, Cyrille Colin, Marie Viprey, Laurent Letrilliart
{"title":"没有首选医生的风险因素和结果:基于法国主要健康保险计划数据的横断面研究。","authors":"Jérôme Tourasse, Annaëlle Testud, Cyrille Colin, Marie Viprey, Laurent Letrilliart","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In France, 90.1% of the population was registered with a preferred doctor in 2019.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the risk factors and healthcare utilization associated with not being registered with a preferred doctor.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Population-based cross-sectional study conducted among insured individuals aged 16 years or above in the Lyon metropolitan area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was extracted from the French health insurance information system for the year 2019. Univariate and multivariate models were used to analyse the risk factors and healthcare utilization associated with not being registered with a preferred doctor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 878 030 individuals, 12.2% were not registered with a preferred doctor. In multivariate analysis, individuals not registered with a preferred doctor were younger (OR up to 18.2 between 16 and 30 years, compared to those aged ≥ 75 years), more often male (OR = 1.13), lived more often in a high medical accessibility area (OR up to 1.13 in the fourth quartile, compared to the first quartile), had less often a low income (OR = 0.64) or a long-term condition status (OR = 0.30), than those registered. Individuals without a preferred doctor had fewer visits to a GP (OR = 0.09), to a specialist (OR = 0.15), and to an emergency department (OR = 0.35), fewer hospitalizations (OR for no hospitalization = 4.54), and fewer selected prevention procedures (OR as low as 0.06 for breast cancer screening).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Not having a preferred doctor may limit access to primary and secondary care. Strategies to enhance registration should be considered, particularly for individuals with a long-term condition and those living in medically underserved areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors and outcomes of not having a preferred doctor: a cross-sectional study based on data from the French main health insurance scheme.\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme Tourasse, Annaëlle Testud, Cyrille Colin, Marie Viprey, Laurent Letrilliart\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmaf008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In France, 90.1% of the population was registered with a preferred doctor in 2019.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the risk factors and healthcare utilization associated with not being registered with a preferred doctor.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Population-based cross-sectional study conducted among insured individuals aged 16 years or above in the Lyon metropolitan area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was extracted from the French health insurance information system for the year 2019. Univariate and multivariate models were used to analyse the risk factors and healthcare utilization associated with not being registered with a preferred doctor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 878 030 individuals, 12.2% were not registered with a preferred doctor. In multivariate analysis, individuals not registered with a preferred doctor were younger (OR up to 18.2 between 16 and 30 years, compared to those aged ≥ 75 years), more often male (OR = 1.13), lived more often in a high medical accessibility area (OR up to 1.13 in the fourth quartile, compared to the first quartile), had less often a low income (OR = 0.64) or a long-term condition status (OR = 0.30), than those registered. Individuals without a preferred doctor had fewer visits to a GP (OR = 0.09), to a specialist (OR = 0.15), and to an emergency department (OR = 0.35), fewer hospitalizations (OR for no hospitalization = 4.54), and fewer selected prevention procedures (OR as low as 0.06 for breast cancer screening).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Not having a preferred doctor may limit access to primary and secondary care. Strategies to enhance registration should be considered, particularly for individuals with a long-term condition and those living in medically underserved areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在法国,2019年有90.1%的人口在首选医生那里注册。目的:探讨未在首选医生处注册的风险因素和医疗保健利用情况。设计和设置:以人群为基础的横断面研究在里昂大都会区16岁或以上的被保险人中进行。方法:数据提取自2019年法国健康保险信息系统。使用单变量和多变量模型来分析与未在首选医生处注册相关的风险因素和医疗保健利用。结果:878 030例患者中,12.2%未在首选医生处注册。在多变量分析中,没有在首选医生那里注册的个体更年轻(16至30岁之间的OR为18.2,与年龄≥75岁的人相比),更多的是男性(OR = 1.13),更多的是生活在高医疗可及性地区(与第一个四分位数相比,第四四分位数的OR为1.13),低收入(OR = 0.64)或长期疾病状态(OR = 0.30)的人比注册的人更少。没有首选医生的个体较少去全科医生(OR = 0.09)、专科医生(OR = 0.15)和急诊科(OR = 0.35),较少住院(OR = 4.54),较少选择预防程序(OR低至乳腺癌筛查的0.06)。结论:没有首选医生可能会限制获得初级和二级保健。应考虑加强登记的战略,特别是对于长期患病的个人和生活在医疗服务不足地区的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors and outcomes of not having a preferred doctor: a cross-sectional study based on data from the French main health insurance scheme.

Background: In France, 90.1% of the population was registered with a preferred doctor in 2019.

Objectives: To explore the risk factors and healthcare utilization associated with not being registered with a preferred doctor.

Design and setting: Population-based cross-sectional study conducted among insured individuals aged 16 years or above in the Lyon metropolitan area.

Methods: Data was extracted from the French health insurance information system for the year 2019. Univariate and multivariate models were used to analyse the risk factors and healthcare utilization associated with not being registered with a preferred doctor.

Results: Among 878 030 individuals, 12.2% were not registered with a preferred doctor. In multivariate analysis, individuals not registered with a preferred doctor were younger (OR up to 18.2 between 16 and 30 years, compared to those aged ≥ 75 years), more often male (OR = 1.13), lived more often in a high medical accessibility area (OR up to 1.13 in the fourth quartile, compared to the first quartile), had less often a low income (OR = 0.64) or a long-term condition status (OR = 0.30), than those registered. Individuals without a preferred doctor had fewer visits to a GP (OR = 0.09), to a specialist (OR = 0.15), and to an emergency department (OR = 0.35), fewer hospitalizations (OR for no hospitalization = 4.54), and fewer selected prevention procedures (OR as low as 0.06 for breast cancer screening).

Conclusions: Not having a preferred doctor may limit access to primary and secondary care. Strategies to enhance registration should be considered, particularly for individuals with a long-term condition and those living in medically underserved areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信