{"title":"霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗的激烈竞争:近年来实践变化发展的全面回顾。","authors":"Umut Yılmaz, Elif Birtaş Ateşoğlu, Burhan Ferhanoğlu","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2519524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There has been a giant leap forward in the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) over the past decade. Emergence of long-term data from large, randomized trials in early-stage disease (eHL) and incorporation of brentuximab vedotin (BV) or nivolumab into the frontline setting through three large phase-3 trials in advanced stages (aHL) are driving the paradigm shift in HL. The new landscape promises chances of cure to over 90% of newly diagnosed patients while maintaining caution for long-term toxicity.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review will cover the published evidence regarding primary analyses or updates within the last five years on phase-3 clinical trials conducted in the frontline treatment setting for HL. Concerning areas of clinical significance where no comparative trial data is available, data from phase-2 trials or real-world analyses will be briefly discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Consolidative radiotherapy is no longer a strict necessity in eHL cases with complete response to frontline chemotherapy and the decision to irradiate in such cases should be individualized. The state-of-the-art in managing aHL requires the use of either BV or nivolumab as introduced by the GHSG HD21 and SWOG S1826 trials, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tight competition for the first line treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comprehensive review of practice-changing developments in recent years.\",\"authors\":\"Umut Yılmaz, Elif Birtaş Ateşoğlu, Burhan Ferhanoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2519524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There has been a giant leap forward in the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) over the past decade. Emergence of long-term data from large, randomized trials in early-stage disease (eHL) and incorporation of brentuximab vedotin (BV) or nivolumab into the frontline setting through three large phase-3 trials in advanced stages (aHL) are driving the paradigm shift in HL. The new landscape promises chances of cure to over 90% of newly diagnosed patients while maintaining caution for long-term toxicity.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review will cover the published evidence regarding primary analyses or updates within the last five years on phase-3 clinical trials conducted in the frontline treatment setting for HL. Concerning areas of clinical significance where no comparative trial data is available, data from phase-2 trials or real-world analyses will be briefly discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Consolidative radiotherapy is no longer a strict necessity in eHL cases with complete response to frontline chemotherapy and the decision to irradiate in such cases should be individualized. The state-of-the-art in managing aHL requires the use of either BV or nivolumab as introduced by the GHSG HD21 and SWOG S1826 trials, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2519524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2519524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tight competition for the first line treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comprehensive review of practice-changing developments in recent years.
Introduction: There has been a giant leap forward in the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) over the past decade. Emergence of long-term data from large, randomized trials in early-stage disease (eHL) and incorporation of brentuximab vedotin (BV) or nivolumab into the frontline setting through three large phase-3 trials in advanced stages (aHL) are driving the paradigm shift in HL. The new landscape promises chances of cure to over 90% of newly diagnosed patients while maintaining caution for long-term toxicity.
Areas covered: This review will cover the published evidence regarding primary analyses or updates within the last five years on phase-3 clinical trials conducted in the frontline treatment setting for HL. Concerning areas of clinical significance where no comparative trial data is available, data from phase-2 trials or real-world analyses will be briefly discussed.
Expert opinion: Consolidative radiotherapy is no longer a strict necessity in eHL cases with complete response to frontline chemotherapy and the decision to irradiate in such cases should be individualized. The state-of-the-art in managing aHL requires the use of either BV or nivolumab as introduced by the GHSG HD21 and SWOG S1826 trials, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.