英国初级保健中粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)使用的变化:2019年至2023年期间495,121例患者中531,735例FIT的基于人群的队列。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-06-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S518048
Alastair James Morton, Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Brian D Nicholson, David J Humes
{"title":"英国初级保健中粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)使用的变化:2019年至2023年期间495,121例患者中531,735例FIT的基于人群的队列。","authors":"Alastair James Morton, Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Brian D Nicholson, David J Humes","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S518048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) is recommended for patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer. This study quantified variations in use across England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of English patients (≥18 years) with a FIT result reported in routinely collected primary care records, 2019-2023. Rates of FIT testing by age, sex, year and region were adjusted using Poisson regression. Multivariate logistic regression compared the effect of factors on the proportion of results exceeding the recommended referral threshold (10µgHb/g).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 01/01/2019 and 05/06/2023 there were 531,735 FIT results among 495,121 patients. Rates of testing increased from 0.69 per thousand person-years in 2019 (95% CI 0.68-0.71) to 27.70 in 2023 (95% CI 27.56-27.85). There were large variations in testing between regions, with rates >3-fold higher in the Northeast than the West Midlands: 17.05 (95% CI 16.87-17.23) versus 4.72 (95% CI 4.67-4.76) per thousand person-years. About 20.4% of FIT results were ≥10µgHb/g. Despite increased testing, this did not change over time. The proportion of FIT ≥10µgHb/g was lower in regions with higher rates of testing, from 16.7% (Southwest) to 25.3% (Southeast; rates of testing 14.62 and 8.00 per thousand person-years respectively). This difference in proportion of FIT ≥10µgHb/g persisted after adjusting for year, sex and age (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.55-0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid increases in FIT testing in primary care show large, persistent variations between English regions, which correlate with the proportion of results meeting the criteria for onward referral. Differences in the population tested and FIT's implementation between regions are likely to explain these variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"523-535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in the Use of Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) in Primary Care in England: A Population-Based Cohort of 531,735 FITs from 495,121 Patients Between 2019 and 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Alastair James Morton, Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Brian D Nicholson, David J Humes\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CLEP.S518048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) is recommended for patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer. This study quantified variations in use across England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of English patients (≥18 years) with a FIT result reported in routinely collected primary care records, 2019-2023. Rates of FIT testing by age, sex, year and region were adjusted using Poisson regression. Multivariate logistic regression compared the effect of factors on the proportion of results exceeding the recommended referral threshold (10µgHb/g).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 01/01/2019 and 05/06/2023 there were 531,735 FIT results among 495,121 patients. Rates of testing increased from 0.69 per thousand person-years in 2019 (95% CI 0.68-0.71) to 27.70 in 2023 (95% CI 27.56-27.85). There were large variations in testing between regions, with rates >3-fold higher in the Northeast than the West Midlands: 17.05 (95% CI 16.87-17.23) versus 4.72 (95% CI 4.67-4.76) per thousand person-years. About 20.4% of FIT results were ≥10µgHb/g. Despite increased testing, this did not change over time. The proportion of FIT ≥10µgHb/g was lower in regions with higher rates of testing, from 16.7% (Southwest) to 25.3% (Southeast; rates of testing 14.62 and 8.00 per thousand person-years respectively). This difference in proportion of FIT ≥10µgHb/g persisted after adjusting for year, sex and age (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.55-0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid increases in FIT testing in primary care show large, persistent variations between English regions, which correlate with the proportion of results meeting the criteria for onward referral. Differences in the population tested and FIT's implementation between regions are likely to explain these variations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"523-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S518048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S518048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)被推荐用于出现提示结直肠癌症状的初级保健患者。这项研究量化了英国各地的使用差异。方法:对2019-2023年常规收集的初级保健记录中报告FIT结果的英国患者(≥18岁)进行回顾性队列研究。使用泊松回归调整年龄、性别、年份和地区的FIT检验率。多因素logistic回归比较了各因素对超过推荐推荐阈值(10µgHb/g)的结果比例的影响。结果:2019年1月1日至2023年6月5日期间,495,121例患者中有531,735例FIT结果。检测率从2019年的0.69 /千人年(95% CI 0.68-0.71)增加到2023年的27.70 /千人年(95% CI 27.56-27.85)。不同地区之间的检测差异很大,东北地区的发病率比西米德兰兹郡高3倍:17.05 (95% CI 16.87-17.23)对4.72 (95% CI 4.67-4.76)每千人年。约20.4%的FIT结果≥10µgHb/g。尽管增加了测试,但这并没有随着时间的推移而改变。在检测率较高的地区,FIT≥10µgHb/g的比例较低,从16.7%(西南)降至25.3%(东南);检测率分别为14.62和8.00 /千人年)。在调整了年份、性别和年龄后,FIT≥10µgHb/g的比例差异仍然存在(OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.55-0.58)。结论:初级保健中FIT测试的快速增加显示出英国地区之间巨大的持续差异,这与符合后续转诊标准的结果比例相关。不同地区间测试人口和FIT实施的差异可能解释了这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variations in the Use of Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) in Primary Care in England: A Population-Based Cohort of 531,735 FITs from 495,121 Patients Between 2019 and 2023.

Background/objectives: Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) is recommended for patients presenting to primary care with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer. This study quantified variations in use across England.

Methods: Retrospective cohort of English patients (≥18 years) with a FIT result reported in routinely collected primary care records, 2019-2023. Rates of FIT testing by age, sex, year and region were adjusted using Poisson regression. Multivariate logistic regression compared the effect of factors on the proportion of results exceeding the recommended referral threshold (10µgHb/g).

Results: Between 01/01/2019 and 05/06/2023 there were 531,735 FIT results among 495,121 patients. Rates of testing increased from 0.69 per thousand person-years in 2019 (95% CI 0.68-0.71) to 27.70 in 2023 (95% CI 27.56-27.85). There were large variations in testing between regions, with rates >3-fold higher in the Northeast than the West Midlands: 17.05 (95% CI 16.87-17.23) versus 4.72 (95% CI 4.67-4.76) per thousand person-years. About 20.4% of FIT results were ≥10µgHb/g. Despite increased testing, this did not change over time. The proportion of FIT ≥10µgHb/g was lower in regions with higher rates of testing, from 16.7% (Southwest) to 25.3% (Southeast; rates of testing 14.62 and 8.00 per thousand person-years respectively). This difference in proportion of FIT ≥10µgHb/g persisted after adjusting for year, sex and age (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.55-0.58).

Conclusion: Rapid increases in FIT testing in primary care show large, persistent variations between English regions, which correlate with the proportion of results meeting the criteria for onward referral. Differences in the population tested and FIT's implementation between regions are likely to explain these variations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology
Clinical Epidemiology Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews. Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews. When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes. The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信