先进治疗药物的临床毒性。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fraser J H Henderson, Simon L Hill
{"title":"先进治疗药物的临床毒性。","authors":"Fraser J H Henderson, Simon L Hill","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) use genes, tissues or cells to offer transformative treatments for a range of diseases. They are associated with different safety challenges when compared to established therapeutics, such as small chemical entities or monoclonal antibodies, due to immunogenicity, off-target effects and organ-specific toxicities. This review evaluates the current clinical evidence on ATMP toxicity, highlighting key mechanisms of toxicity and describing approaches to risk management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify studies reporting toxicities associated with gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs), somatic-cell therapy medicinal products, tissue-engineered products and combined ATMPs. Data were extracted and collated qualitatively, focusing on acute and chronic clinical toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute toxicity, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were most often reported in GTMPs, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Chronic risks of GTMPs include genotoxicity and tumorigenicity, especially with high-dose adeno-associated virus-based therapies. Somatic-cell therapy medicinal products carry risks of immunological toxicity and tumour formation, particularly in stem cell-based approaches. Tissue-engineered products present challenges of biocompatibility, scaffold degradation and host integration. Management strategies to mitigate anticipated toxicity include preconditioning regimens, safer vector design, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. tocilizumab) and long-term monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ATMPs offer significant therapeutic promise but require robust safety assessments and proactive risk management plans to address their complex potential toxicity profiles. Personalized approaches, advanced preclinical models and stringent regulatory oversight are essential to ensure these therapies fulfil their potential without compromising patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical toxicity of advanced therapy medicinal products.\",\"authors\":\"Fraser J H Henderson, Simon L Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) use genes, tissues or cells to offer transformative treatments for a range of diseases. They are associated with different safety challenges when compared to established therapeutics, such as small chemical entities or monoclonal antibodies, due to immunogenicity, off-target effects and organ-specific toxicities. This review evaluates the current clinical evidence on ATMP toxicity, highlighting key mechanisms of toxicity and describing approaches to risk management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify studies reporting toxicities associated with gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs), somatic-cell therapy medicinal products, tissue-engineered products and combined ATMPs. Data were extracted and collated qualitatively, focusing on acute and chronic clinical toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute toxicity, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were most often reported in GTMPs, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Chronic risks of GTMPs include genotoxicity and tumorigenicity, especially with high-dose adeno-associated virus-based therapies. Somatic-cell therapy medicinal products carry risks of immunological toxicity and tumour formation, particularly in stem cell-based approaches. Tissue-engineered products present challenges of biocompatibility, scaffold degradation and host integration. Management strategies to mitigate anticipated toxicity include preconditioning regimens, safer vector design, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. tocilizumab) and long-term monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ATMPs offer significant therapeutic promise but require robust safety assessments and proactive risk management plans to address their complex potential toxicity profiles. Personalized approaches, advanced preclinical models and stringent regulatory oversight are essential to ensure these therapies fulfil their potential without compromising patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:先进治疗药物产品(ATMPs)利用基因、组织或细胞为一系列疾病提供变革性治疗。与现有的治疗方法(如小化学实体或单克隆抗体)相比,由于免疫原性、脱靶效应和器官特异性毒性,它们具有不同的安全性挑战。这篇综述评估了目前关于ATMP毒性的临床证据,强调了毒性的关键机制,并描述了风险管理的方法。方法:使用MEDLINE和Embase数据库进行范围综述,以确定与基因治疗药物(gtmp)、体细胞治疗药物、组织工程产品和联合atmp相关的毒性研究。对数据进行定性提取和整理,重点关注急性和慢性临床毒性。结果:急性毒性,如细胞因子释放综合征和免疫效应细胞相关的神经毒性综合征在GTMPs中最常被报道,特别是嵌合抗原受体t细胞治疗。gtmp的慢性风险包括遗传毒性和致瘤性,特别是高剂量腺相关病毒治疗。体细胞治疗药物具有免疫毒性和肿瘤形成的风险,特别是在基于干细胞的方法中。组织工程产品在生物相容性、支架降解和宿主整合方面面临挑战。减轻预期毒性的管理策略包括预处理方案、更安全的载体设计、免疫抑制疗法(如托珠单抗)和长期监测。结论:atmp具有显著的治疗前景,但需要强有力的安全性评估和积极的风险管理计划来解决其复杂的潜在毒性。个性化方法、先进的临床前模型和严格的监管监督对于确保这些疗法在不损害患者安全的情况下发挥其潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The clinical toxicity of advanced therapy medicinal products.

Aims: Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) use genes, tissues or cells to offer transformative treatments for a range of diseases. They are associated with different safety challenges when compared to established therapeutics, such as small chemical entities or monoclonal antibodies, due to immunogenicity, off-target effects and organ-specific toxicities. This review evaluates the current clinical evidence on ATMP toxicity, highlighting key mechanisms of toxicity and describing approaches to risk management.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify studies reporting toxicities associated with gene therapy medicinal products (GTMPs), somatic-cell therapy medicinal products, tissue-engineered products and combined ATMPs. Data were extracted and collated qualitatively, focusing on acute and chronic clinical toxicity.

Results: Acute toxicity, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were most often reported in GTMPs, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Chronic risks of GTMPs include genotoxicity and tumorigenicity, especially with high-dose adeno-associated virus-based therapies. Somatic-cell therapy medicinal products carry risks of immunological toxicity and tumour formation, particularly in stem cell-based approaches. Tissue-engineered products present challenges of biocompatibility, scaffold degradation and host integration. Management strategies to mitigate anticipated toxicity include preconditioning regimens, safer vector design, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. tocilizumab) and long-term monitoring.

Conclusion: ATMPs offer significant therapeutic promise but require robust safety assessments and proactive risk management plans to address their complex potential toxicity profiles. Personalized approaches, advanced preclinical models and stringent regulatory oversight are essential to ensure these therapies fulfil their potential without compromising patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信