新辅助剂量密集的蒽环类和环磷酰胺联合卡铂、紫杉醇和派姆单抗治疗三阴性乳腺癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07746-y
Vitor Teixeira Liutti, David Laios do Vale, Bruno Lins de Souza, Rafael Ricci Ferrari Manea, Daniel Vilarim Araújo
{"title":"新辅助剂量密集的蒽环类和环磷酰胺联合卡铂、紫杉醇和派姆单抗治疗三阴性乳腺癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Vitor Teixeira Liutti, David Laios do Vale, Bruno Lins de Souza, Rafael Ricci Ferrari Manea, Daniel Vilarim Araújo","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07746-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has become the standard neoadjuvant regimen for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the KEYNOTE-522 trial did not use dose-dense (dd) anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) as part of its chemotherapy backbone. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) and pembrolizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with CT and pembrolizumab, with or without comparisons to 3-weekly AC in TNBC. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects model for studies comparing two schedules, and single-arm proportional meta-analysis to summarize endpoints for dose-dense regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four observational studies, comprising 535 patients (329 receiving ddAC and 206 receiving 3-weekly AC), met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared the two schedules, while one evaluated ddAC. No difference in pCR was observed between both schedules (66.1% vs. 61.6%; RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.94-1.28; p = 0.25). However, patients receiving ddAC experienced higher incidence of grade III-IV adverse events (43.7% vs. 29.7%; RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.15-2.37; p = 0.007). No differences were found in dose modifications or treatment delays between the two schedules. In the combined analysis of studies evaluating ddAC, the overall pCR was 63%, with a 40% incidence of treatment delays. No included studies reported survival data for ddAC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with ddAC demonstrated a pCR incidence comparable to that reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. When compared to 3-weekly AC, ddAC was associated with a higher toxicity, with no difference in pCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"427-434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline and cyclophosphamide in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vitor Teixeira Liutti, David Laios do Vale, Bruno Lins de Souza, Rafael Ricci Ferrari Manea, Daniel Vilarim Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07746-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has become the standard neoadjuvant regimen for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the KEYNOTE-522 trial did not use dose-dense (dd) anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) as part of its chemotherapy backbone. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) and pembrolizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with CT and pembrolizumab, with or without comparisons to 3-weekly AC in TNBC. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects model for studies comparing two schedules, and single-arm proportional meta-analysis to summarize endpoints for dose-dense regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four observational studies, comprising 535 patients (329 receiving ddAC and 206 receiving 3-weekly AC), met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared the two schedules, while one evaluated ddAC. No difference in pCR was observed between both schedules (66.1% vs. 61.6%; RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.94-1.28; p = 0.25). However, patients receiving ddAC experienced higher incidence of grade III-IV adverse events (43.7% vs. 29.7%; RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.15-2.37; p = 0.007). No differences were found in dose modifications or treatment delays between the two schedules. In the combined analysis of studies evaluating ddAC, the overall pCR was 63%, with a 40% incidence of treatment delays. No included studies reported survival data for ddAC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with ddAC demonstrated a pCR incidence comparable to that reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. When compared to 3-weekly AC, ddAC was associated with a higher toxicity, with no difference in pCR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"427-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07746-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07746-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:派姆单抗联合化疗已成为三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准新辅助方案。然而,KEYNOTE-522试验没有使用剂量密集(dd)蒽环类药物和环磷酰胺(AC)作为其化疗骨干的一部分。本荟萃分析评估了新辅助ddAC联合卡铂紫杉醇(CT)和派姆单抗的疗效和安全性。方法:进行了系统搜索,以确定评估新辅助ddAC联合CT和派姆单抗的研究,并与TNBC中3周AC进行或不进行比较。采用随机效应模型对比较两种方案的研究进行统计分析,并采用单臂比例荟萃分析总结剂量密集方案的终点。结果:4项观察性研究,包括535例患者(329例接受ddAC, 206例接受3周AC),符合纳入标准。三项研究比较了这两种时间表,而一项研究评估了ddAC。两组间pCR无差异(66.1% vs. 61.6%;RR 1.10;95% ci 0.94-1.28;p = 0.25)。然而,接受ddAC的患者出现更高的III-IV级不良事件发生率(43.7% vs 29.7%;RR 1.65;95% ci 1.15-2.37;p = 0.007)。两种方案在剂量调整或治疗延迟方面没有发现差异。在评估ddAC的研究的综合分析中,总体pCR为63%,治疗延误发生率为40%。没有纳入的研究报告了ddAC患者的生存数据。结论:新辅助派姆单抗与ddAC的pCR发生率与KEYNOTE-522试验报告的发生率相当。与3周AC相比,ddAC与更高的毒性相关,pCR无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline and cyclophosphamide in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has become the standard neoadjuvant regimen for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the KEYNOTE-522 trial did not use dose-dense (dd) anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) as part of its chemotherapy backbone. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) and pembrolizumab.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies evaluating neoadjuvant ddAC in combination with CT and pembrolizumab, with or without comparisons to 3-weekly AC in TNBC. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects model for studies comparing two schedules, and single-arm proportional meta-analysis to summarize endpoints for dose-dense regimen.

Results: Four observational studies, comprising 535 patients (329 receiving ddAC and 206 receiving 3-weekly AC), met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared the two schedules, while one evaluated ddAC. No difference in pCR was observed between both schedules (66.1% vs. 61.6%; RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.94-1.28; p = 0.25). However, patients receiving ddAC experienced higher incidence of grade III-IV adverse events (43.7% vs. 29.7%; RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.15-2.37; p = 0.007). No differences were found in dose modifications or treatment delays between the two schedules. In the combined analysis of studies evaluating ddAC, the overall pCR was 63%, with a 40% incidence of treatment delays. No included studies reported survival data for ddAC patients.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with ddAC demonstrated a pCR incidence comparable to that reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. When compared to 3-weekly AC, ddAC was associated with a higher toxicity, with no difference in pCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信