了解教师在应试教育体系中进行课堂评估的不同方式

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David Baidoo-Anu , Christopher DeLuca , Amanda Cooper , Saad Chahine
{"title":"了解教师在应试教育体系中进行课堂评估的不同方式","authors":"David Baidoo-Anu ,&nbsp;Christopher DeLuca ,&nbsp;Amanda Cooper ,&nbsp;Saad Chahine","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study is part of a larger dissertation that examined the assessment culture within Ghana’s education system. Specifically, this paper explores the diverse ways teachers approach assessment in an examination-oriented educational system. Using a survey design, 427 K-12 teachers in Ghana participated in the study. The teachers responded to the abridged version of the Approaches to Classroom Assessment Inventory (ACAI; version 3.0). The results of the study showed that, despite having the same educational system and policies, Ghanaian K-12 teachers have varying ways of approaching classroom assessment. Through latent profile analysis, three distinct groups of assessors were identified among teacher participants: <em>improvement-accountability oriented assessors</em>, <em>teacher-centred assessors</em>, and <em>accountability oriented assessors</em>. The study found that teachers’ demographics (e.g., years of teaching experience, age, assessment education, school division, class level, and school location) significantly impacted their approaches to assessment. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 103336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the diverse ways teachers approach classroom assessment in an examination-oriented educational system\",\"authors\":\"David Baidoo-Anu ,&nbsp;Christopher DeLuca ,&nbsp;Amanda Cooper ,&nbsp;Saad Chahine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study is part of a larger dissertation that examined the assessment culture within Ghana’s education system. Specifically, this paper explores the diverse ways teachers approach assessment in an examination-oriented educational system. Using a survey design, 427 K-12 teachers in Ghana participated in the study. The teachers responded to the abridged version of the Approaches to Classroom Assessment Inventory (ACAI; version 3.0). The results of the study showed that, despite having the same educational system and policies, Ghanaian K-12 teachers have varying ways of approaching classroom assessment. Through latent profile analysis, three distinct groups of assessors were identified among teacher participants: <em>improvement-accountability oriented assessors</em>, <em>teacher-centred assessors</em>, and <em>accountability oriented assessors</em>. The study found that teachers’ demographics (e.g., years of teaching experience, age, assessment education, school division, class level, and school location) significantly impacted their approaches to assessment. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001348\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是一篇更大的论文的一部分,该论文研究了加纳教育体系中的评估文化。具体而言,本文探讨了教师在应试教育系统中进行评估的不同方式。采用调查设计,加纳427名K-12教师参与了这项研究。教师对课堂评估量表(ACAI;版本3.0)。研究结果表明,尽管拥有相同的教育制度和政策,加纳K-12教师却有不同的课堂评估方式。通过潜在特征分析,在教师参与者中发现了三组不同的评估者:改进问责导向评估者、以教师为中心的评估者和问责导向评估者。研究发现,教师的人口统计学特征(如教学经验、年龄、评估教育、学校分区、班级水平和学校位置)显著影响他们的评估方法。对政策和实践的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the diverse ways teachers approach classroom assessment in an examination-oriented educational system
This study is part of a larger dissertation that examined the assessment culture within Ghana’s education system. Specifically, this paper explores the diverse ways teachers approach assessment in an examination-oriented educational system. Using a survey design, 427 K-12 teachers in Ghana participated in the study. The teachers responded to the abridged version of the Approaches to Classroom Assessment Inventory (ACAI; version 3.0). The results of the study showed that, despite having the same educational system and policies, Ghanaian K-12 teachers have varying ways of approaching classroom assessment. Through latent profile analysis, three distinct groups of assessors were identified among teacher participants: improvement-accountability oriented assessors, teacher-centred assessors, and accountability oriented assessors. The study found that teachers’ demographics (e.g., years of teaching experience, age, assessment education, school division, class level, and school location) significantly impacted their approaches to assessment. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信