Maggie Zgambo , Martina Costello , Melanie Buhlmann , Justine Maldon , Edah Anyango , Esther Adama
{"title":"护理教育中的人工智能和学术诚信:一项关于使用、认知和制度影响的混合方法研究","authors":"Maggie Zgambo , Martina Costello , Melanie Buhlmann , Justine Maldon , Edah Anyango , Esther Adama","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education has generated substantial debate among academics and students, given the potential for students to engage in academic misconduct through the misuse of AI. Academics argue that AI poses a serious threat to the foundational development of nurses through the questionable integrity of AI-generated academic work and by undermining the development of critical thinking skills essential for professional practice. However, there is limited research on nursing students' integration of AI technologies in their studies.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This study utilised a convergent parallel mixed methods approach to develop a multiphase approach with convergent parallel techniques for the qualitative and quantitative phases. The quantitative method utilised a Qualtrics-powered online survey to engage 188 nursing students, exploring various domains related to AI use. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews with 13 purposively sampled students provided deeper insights. The qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach, while the quantitative data were analysed using SPSS.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>In the survey, 24 % of respondents reported using AI, ranging from moderate to extensive usage. In logistics regression analysis, hearing about AI (OR = 3.9; CI 1.07–10.2; <em>p</em> < 0.05), the belief that AI was useful in the studies (OR = 5.5; CI 1.7–17.3; <em>p</em> < 0.01), and the perception that learning to use AI is easy (OR = 3.4; CI 1.1–11.1; <em>p</em> < 0.05) predicted AI use. Qualitative findings revealed that all students used AI for various academic purposes. The ‘<em>fascinating’</em>, ‘<em>intelligent’</em> and ‘<em>efficient’</em> nature of AI in handling ‘<em>time-consuming</em>’ academic tasks motivated its use. However, concerns about breaching academic integrity and the value of achieving success through personal effort served as deterrents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that while AI's efficiency drives students to adopt it, they remain cautious about its ethical implications, leading to uncertainty in its application within academic practices. This highlights the critical need for institutional support and explicit guidelines on responsible AI integration in educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 106796"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in nursing education: A mixed methods study on usage, perceptions, and institutional implications\",\"authors\":\"Maggie Zgambo , Martina Costello , Melanie Buhlmann , Justine Maldon , Edah Anyango , Esther Adama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education has generated substantial debate among academics and students, given the potential for students to engage in academic misconduct through the misuse of AI. Academics argue that AI poses a serious threat to the foundational development of nurses through the questionable integrity of AI-generated academic work and by undermining the development of critical thinking skills essential for professional practice. However, there is limited research on nursing students' integration of AI technologies in their studies.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This study utilised a convergent parallel mixed methods approach to develop a multiphase approach with convergent parallel techniques for the qualitative and quantitative phases. The quantitative method utilised a Qualtrics-powered online survey to engage 188 nursing students, exploring various domains related to AI use. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews with 13 purposively sampled students provided deeper insights. The qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach, while the quantitative data were analysed using SPSS.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>In the survey, 24 % of respondents reported using AI, ranging from moderate to extensive usage. In logistics regression analysis, hearing about AI (OR = 3.9; CI 1.07–10.2; <em>p</em> < 0.05), the belief that AI was useful in the studies (OR = 5.5; CI 1.7–17.3; <em>p</em> < 0.01), and the perception that learning to use AI is easy (OR = 3.4; CI 1.1–11.1; <em>p</em> < 0.05) predicted AI use. Qualitative findings revealed that all students used AI for various academic purposes. The ‘<em>fascinating’</em>, ‘<em>intelligent’</em> and ‘<em>efficient’</em> nature of AI in handling ‘<em>time-consuming</em>’ academic tasks motivated its use. However, concerns about breaching academic integrity and the value of achieving success through personal effort served as deterrents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that while AI's efficiency drives students to adopt it, they remain cautious about its ethical implications, leading to uncertainty in its application within academic practices. This highlights the critical need for institutional support and explicit guidelines on responsible AI integration in educational settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725002321\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725002321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in nursing education: A mixed methods study on usage, perceptions, and institutional implications
Background
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education has generated substantial debate among academics and students, given the potential for students to engage in academic misconduct through the misuse of AI. Academics argue that AI poses a serious threat to the foundational development of nurses through the questionable integrity of AI-generated academic work and by undermining the development of critical thinking skills essential for professional practice. However, there is limited research on nursing students' integration of AI technologies in their studies.
Method
This study utilised a convergent parallel mixed methods approach to develop a multiphase approach with convergent parallel techniques for the qualitative and quantitative phases. The quantitative method utilised a Qualtrics-powered online survey to engage 188 nursing students, exploring various domains related to AI use. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews with 13 purposively sampled students provided deeper insights. The qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach, while the quantitative data were analysed using SPSS.
Result
In the survey, 24 % of respondents reported using AI, ranging from moderate to extensive usage. In logistics regression analysis, hearing about AI (OR = 3.9; CI 1.07–10.2; p < 0.05), the belief that AI was useful in the studies (OR = 5.5; CI 1.7–17.3; p < 0.01), and the perception that learning to use AI is easy (OR = 3.4; CI 1.1–11.1; p < 0.05) predicted AI use. Qualitative findings revealed that all students used AI for various academic purposes. The ‘fascinating’, ‘intelligent’ and ‘efficient’ nature of AI in handling ‘time-consuming’ academic tasks motivated its use. However, concerns about breaching academic integrity and the value of achieving success through personal effort served as deterrents.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that while AI's efficiency drives students to adopt it, they remain cautious about its ethical implications, leading to uncertainty in its application within academic practices. This highlights the critical need for institutional support and explicit guidelines on responsible AI integration in educational settings.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.