Chunlei He , Enyu Yuan , Lei Ye , Hui Xu , Qiyou Wu , Jin Yao , Yuntian Chen , Bin Song
{"title":"肾细胞癌淋巴结受累检测的node - rads 1.0:二维和三维CT成像研究","authors":"Chunlei He , Enyu Yuan , Lei Ye , Hui Xu , Qiyou Wu , Jin Yao , Yuntian Chen , Bin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) score in predicting lymph node (LN) involvement (LNI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and to compare the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score based on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From January 2012 to September 2024, patients with RCC and histologically confirmed LN status who underwent preoperative abdomen computed tomography imaging were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Radiological assessments were performed independently and blinded by three readers according to the Node-RADS, and both Node-RADS scores based on 2D and 3D modality were recorded. The gold reference of LNI was determined by the histological results after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and inter-agreements for different features were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Finally, 375 patients (median age 55 years; interquartile range (IQR), 45–63 years), including 270 negative LNI and 105 positive LNI, were enrolled in the study. Younger patients showed higher LNI prevalence (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Node-RADS score ≥ 3 yielded a sensitivity of 0.876, a specificity of 0.926 and an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.866–0.937) on 2D, which was comparable to Node-RADS score on 3D (Delong test: <em>p</em> = 0.651). An excellent inter-reader agreement was observed for Node-RADS score between three readers based on 2D and 3D modality (Kendall’s W 0.889 and 0.869).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Node-RADS score demonstrates high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with RCC. Node-RADS score based on 2D and 3D modality demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Node-RADS 1.0 for lymph node involvement detection in renal cell carcinoma: A study on 2D and 3D CT imaging\",\"authors\":\"Chunlei He , Enyu Yuan , Lei Ye , Hui Xu , Qiyou Wu , Jin Yao , Yuntian Chen , Bin Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) score in predicting lymph node (LN) involvement (LNI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and to compare the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score based on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From January 2012 to September 2024, patients with RCC and histologically confirmed LN status who underwent preoperative abdomen computed tomography imaging were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Radiological assessments were performed independently and blinded by three readers according to the Node-RADS, and both Node-RADS scores based on 2D and 3D modality were recorded. The gold reference of LNI was determined by the histological results after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and inter-agreements for different features were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Finally, 375 patients (median age 55 years; interquartile range (IQR), 45–63 years), including 270 negative LNI and 105 positive LNI, were enrolled in the study. Younger patients showed higher LNI prevalence (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Node-RADS score ≥ 3 yielded a sensitivity of 0.876, a specificity of 0.926 and an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.866–0.937) on 2D, which was comparable to Node-RADS score on 3D (Delong test: <em>p</em> = 0.651). An excellent inter-reader agreement was observed for Node-RADS score between three readers based on 2D and 3D modality (Kendall’s W 0.889 and 0.869).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Node-RADS score demonstrates high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with RCC. Node-RADS score based on 2D and 3D modality demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003250\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价淋巴结报告和数据系统1.0 (node - rads)评分对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者淋巴结(LN)累及(LNI)的诊断准确性,并比较基于二维(2D)和三维(3D)模式的node - rads评分的诊断效果。方法回顾性选取2012年1月至2024年9月行术前腹部计算机断层扫描的肾细胞癌和组织学证实的LN患者。根据Node-RADS进行独立和盲法的放射学评估,并记录基于2D和3D模式的Node-RADS评分。术后组织学结果确定LNI的金参考值。计算灵敏度、特异度、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)及不同特征间的一致性。结果375例患者(中位年龄55岁;四分位数范围(IQR) 45-63岁,包括270例LNI阴性和105例LNI阳性纳入研究。年轻患者的LNI患病率较高(p <;0.001)。Node-RADS评分≥3在2D上的敏感性为0.876,特异性为0.926,AUC为0.901 (95% CI 0.866-0.937),与3D上的Node-RADS评分相当(Delong检验:p = 0.651)。基于2D和3D模态,三名读者之间的Node-RADS评分具有良好的读者间一致性(Kendall 's W 0.889和0.869)。结论:Node-RADS评分在鉴别肾细胞癌患者的LNI方面具有较高的总体准确性。基于2D和3D模式的Node-RADS评分显示出可比较的诊断性能。
Node-RADS 1.0 for lymph node involvement detection in renal cell carcinoma: A study on 2D and 3D CT imaging
Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) score in predicting lymph node (LN) involvement (LNI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients and to compare the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score based on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) modality.
Methods
From January 2012 to September 2024, patients with RCC and histologically confirmed LN status who underwent preoperative abdomen computed tomography imaging were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Radiological assessments were performed independently and blinded by three readers according to the Node-RADS, and both Node-RADS scores based on 2D and 3D modality were recorded. The gold reference of LNI was determined by the histological results after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and inter-agreements for different features were calculated.
Results
Finally, 375 patients (median age 55 years; interquartile range (IQR), 45–63 years), including 270 negative LNI and 105 positive LNI, were enrolled in the study. Younger patients showed higher LNI prevalence (p < 0.001). Node-RADS score ≥ 3 yielded a sensitivity of 0.876, a specificity of 0.926 and an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI 0.866–0.937) on 2D, which was comparable to Node-RADS score on 3D (Delong test: p = 0.651). An excellent inter-reader agreement was observed for Node-RADS score between three readers based on 2D and 3D modality (Kendall’s W 0.889 and 0.869).
Conclusions
The Node-RADS score demonstrates high overall accuracy in identifying LNI in patients with RCC. Node-RADS score based on 2D and 3D modality demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.