June Kim, Ester Villalonga-Olives, George Doumat, Roumen M Vesselinov, Julio A Huapaya, Hatoon M N Abbas, Vaidehi Kaza, Srinivas Bollineni, Nicholas Ladikos, Adrian Lawrence, Manish R Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Fernando Torres, Vipul Patel, Anu Varghese, Aldo T Iacono, Bartley P Griffith, Michael L Terrin, Irina Timofte
{"title":"患者对肺移植远程医疗的满意度:来自COVID-19大流行的教训。","authors":"June Kim, Ester Villalonga-Olives, George Doumat, Roumen M Vesselinov, Julio A Huapaya, Hatoon M N Abbas, Vaidehi Kaza, Srinivas Bollineni, Nicholas Ladikos, Adrian Lawrence, Manish R Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Fernando Torres, Vipul Patel, Anu Varghese, Aldo T Iacono, Bartley P Griffith, Michael L Terrin, Irina Timofte","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine has become essential for maintaining post-transplant care while reducing exposure risks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Lung transplant recipients require frequent monitoring due to chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. This study evaluates patient satisfaction and the feasibility of a lung transplant telemedicine program using a multidimensional, patient-centered survey. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted an observational study at the University of Maryland Lung Transplant Center between March and November 2020. A customized telemedicine satisfaction survey, developed with expert and patient input, was distributed via e-mail to lung transplant recipients, with a follow-up 6 months later. Key domains included quality of care, technology usability, cost burden, and overall experience. <b>Results:</b> Of 148 patients surveyed, 106 responded, with 53 completing the follow-up survey. In the initial and follow-up surveys, 94% and 89% rated telemedicine care as \"very good\" or \"excellent.\" Technology usability was high, with 96% and 94% reporting good understanding. Most patients (90% initially, 84% at follow-up) noted decreased travel costs. However, while patients appreciated these benefits, preference for in-person visits increased from 45% initially to 65% at follow-up. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lung transplant patients reported high satisfaction with telemedicine, benefiting from reduced costs and COVID-19 exposure risk. The survey captured the complexities of post-transplant care while addressing technological barriers. Future research should validate telemedicine satisfaction tools across multiple centers and assess its impact on clinical outcomes in transplant populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction with Lung Transplant Telemedicine: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"June Kim, Ester Villalonga-Olives, George Doumat, Roumen M Vesselinov, Julio A Huapaya, Hatoon M N Abbas, Vaidehi Kaza, Srinivas Bollineni, Nicholas Ladikos, Adrian Lawrence, Manish R Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Fernando Torres, Vipul Patel, Anu Varghese, Aldo T Iacono, Bartley P Griffith, Michael L Terrin, Irina Timofte\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2025.0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine has become essential for maintaining post-transplant care while reducing exposure risks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Lung transplant recipients require frequent monitoring due to chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. This study evaluates patient satisfaction and the feasibility of a lung transplant telemedicine program using a multidimensional, patient-centered survey. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted an observational study at the University of Maryland Lung Transplant Center between March and November 2020. A customized telemedicine satisfaction survey, developed with expert and patient input, was distributed via e-mail to lung transplant recipients, with a follow-up 6 months later. Key domains included quality of care, technology usability, cost burden, and overall experience. <b>Results:</b> Of 148 patients surveyed, 106 responded, with 53 completing the follow-up survey. In the initial and follow-up surveys, 94% and 89% rated telemedicine care as \\\"very good\\\" or \\\"excellent.\\\" Technology usability was high, with 96% and 94% reporting good understanding. Most patients (90% initially, 84% at follow-up) noted decreased travel costs. However, while patients appreciated these benefits, preference for in-person visits increased from 45% initially to 65% at follow-up. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lung transplant patients reported high satisfaction with telemedicine, benefiting from reduced costs and COVID-19 exposure risk. The survey captured the complexities of post-transplant care while addressing technological barriers. Future research should validate telemedicine satisfaction tools across multiple centers and assess its impact on clinical outcomes in transplant populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Satisfaction with Lung Transplant Telemedicine: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Background: Telemedicine has become essential for maintaining post-transplant care while reducing exposure risks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Lung transplant recipients require frequent monitoring due to chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. This study evaluates patient satisfaction and the feasibility of a lung transplant telemedicine program using a multidimensional, patient-centered survey. Methods: We conducted an observational study at the University of Maryland Lung Transplant Center between March and November 2020. A customized telemedicine satisfaction survey, developed with expert and patient input, was distributed via e-mail to lung transplant recipients, with a follow-up 6 months later. Key domains included quality of care, technology usability, cost burden, and overall experience. Results: Of 148 patients surveyed, 106 responded, with 53 completing the follow-up survey. In the initial and follow-up surveys, 94% and 89% rated telemedicine care as "very good" or "excellent." Technology usability was high, with 96% and 94% reporting good understanding. Most patients (90% initially, 84% at follow-up) noted decreased travel costs. However, while patients appreciated these benefits, preference for in-person visits increased from 45% initially to 65% at follow-up. Conclusion: Lung transplant patients reported high satisfaction with telemedicine, benefiting from reduced costs and COVID-19 exposure risk. The survey captured the complexities of post-transplant care while addressing technological barriers. Future research should validate telemedicine satisfaction tools across multiple centers and assess its impact on clinical outcomes in transplant populations.