妇产科实习医生对多布斯最高法院判决影响的见解。

Kate V Meriwether, A Jenna Beckham, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Tova Ablove, Arthur Ollendorff, Lindsay E Dale, Jamie W Krashin, Francisco Orejuela, Donna Mazloomdoost, Cara L Grimes, William D Winkelman, Katie Propst, Maria E Florian-Rodriguez, Jema K Turk, Olivia H Chang, Sarah Horvath, Stephanie T Ros, Catrina C Crisp, Timothy R Petersen, Cheryl B Iglesia
{"title":"妇产科实习医生对多布斯最高法院判决影响的见解。","authors":"Kate V Meriwether, A Jenna Beckham, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Tova Ablove, Arthur Ollendorff, Lindsay E Dale, Jamie W Krashin, Francisco Orejuela, Donna Mazloomdoost, Cara L Grimes, William D Winkelman, Katie Propst, Maria E Florian-Rodriguez, Jema K Turk, Olivia H Chang, Sarah Horvath, Stephanie T Ros, Catrina C Crisp, Timothy R Petersen, Cheryl B Iglesia","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The impact of the <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> (Dobbs) Supreme Court decision on training of United States Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residents and fellows needs qualitative exploration. We aimed to describe how OBGYN residents and fellows feel their training may be affected. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We disseminated a REDCap survey from September 19, 2022, to December 1, 2022, among OBGYN residents and fellows with open-ended questions querying trainees' opinions around how the Dobbs decision may affect their training and the field of OBGYN. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The survey received 469 responses, of which 70% contributed data for qualitative analyses. The qualitative data indicated four themes: uncertainty about the future, concerns about patient care, concerns and discrepancies in OBGYN training, and suggestions and hopes for the future. Trainees, even if currently well trained in their view, are concerned about other trainees, patient safety in OBGYN clinical situations, and uncertainty about their own careers and the future of OBGYN. They are concerned that restrictions on family planning and pregnancy management in certain states will restrict care access, limit patient safety, and affect the OBGYN workforce in those locations. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This survey of OBGYN trainees indicates significant uncertainty about equity for training and patient care in clinical situations potentially affected by the Dobbs decision and a wider concern about how this will affect the field of OBGYN and the safety of women in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":"34 6","pages":"823-834"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainee Insights Regarding the Effect of the <i>Dobbs</i> Supreme Court Decision.\",\"authors\":\"Kate V Meriwether, A Jenna Beckham, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Tova Ablove, Arthur Ollendorff, Lindsay E Dale, Jamie W Krashin, Francisco Orejuela, Donna Mazloomdoost, Cara L Grimes, William D Winkelman, Katie Propst, Maria E Florian-Rodriguez, Jema K Turk, Olivia H Chang, Sarah Horvath, Stephanie T Ros, Catrina C Crisp, Timothy R Petersen, Cheryl B Iglesia\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The impact of the <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> (Dobbs) Supreme Court decision on training of United States Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residents and fellows needs qualitative exploration. We aimed to describe how OBGYN residents and fellows feel their training may be affected. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We disseminated a REDCap survey from September 19, 2022, to December 1, 2022, among OBGYN residents and fellows with open-ended questions querying trainees' opinions around how the Dobbs decision may affect their training and the field of OBGYN. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The survey received 469 responses, of which 70% contributed data for qualitative analyses. The qualitative data indicated four themes: uncertainty about the future, concerns about patient care, concerns and discrepancies in OBGYN training, and suggestions and hopes for the future. Trainees, even if currently well trained in their view, are concerned about other trainees, patient safety in OBGYN clinical situations, and uncertainty about their own careers and the future of OBGYN. They are concerned that restrictions on family planning and pregnancy management in certain states will restrict care access, limit patient safety, and affect the OBGYN workforce in those locations. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This survey of OBGYN trainees indicates significant uncertainty about equity for training and patient care in clinical situations potentially affected by the Dobbs decision and a wider concern about how this will affect the field of OBGYN and the safety of women in the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"823-834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织(Dobbs)最高法院判决对美国妇产科(OBGYN)住院医师和研究员培训的影响需要进行定性探讨。我们的目的是描述妇产科住院医生和同事如何认为他们的培训可能会受到影响。方法:我们于2022年9月19日至2022年12月1日在OBGYN住院医师和研究员中进行了一项REDCap调查,以开放式问题询问受训者对Dobbs决定如何影响他们的培训和OBGYN领域的看法。结果:本次调查共收到469份回复,其中70%的回复提供了用于定性分析的数据。定性数据显示了四个主题:对未来的不确定性,对患者护理的担忧,对妇产科培训的担忧和差异,以及对未来的建议和希望。受训者,即使目前在他们看来受过良好的训练,也会担心其他受训者,在妇产科临床情况下的患者安全,以及他们自己的职业和妇产科未来的不确定性。他们担心,某些州对计划生育和怀孕管理的限制将限制医疗服务的获取,限制患者的安全,并影响这些地区的妇产科员工。结论:这项对妇产科学员的调查表明,在临床情况下,培训和患者护理的公平性存在重大不确定性,这可能受到Dobbs决定的影响,并且人们更广泛地关注这将如何影响美国妇产科领域和妇女的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainee Insights Regarding the Effect of the Dobbs Supreme Court Decision.

Objectives: The impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) Supreme Court decision on training of United States Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residents and fellows needs qualitative exploration. We aimed to describe how OBGYN residents and fellows feel their training may be affected. Methods: We disseminated a REDCap survey from September 19, 2022, to December 1, 2022, among OBGYN residents and fellows with open-ended questions querying trainees' opinions around how the Dobbs decision may affect their training and the field of OBGYN. Results: The survey received 469 responses, of which 70% contributed data for qualitative analyses. The qualitative data indicated four themes: uncertainty about the future, concerns about patient care, concerns and discrepancies in OBGYN training, and suggestions and hopes for the future. Trainees, even if currently well trained in their view, are concerned about other trainees, patient safety in OBGYN clinical situations, and uncertainty about their own careers and the future of OBGYN. They are concerned that restrictions on family planning and pregnancy management in certain states will restrict care access, limit patient safety, and affect the OBGYN workforce in those locations. Conclusions: This survey of OBGYN trainees indicates significant uncertainty about equity for training and patient care in clinical situations potentially affected by the Dobbs decision and a wider concern about how this will affect the field of OBGYN and the safety of women in the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信