Hristian Hinkov, Luise Roehrich, Chong Bin Lee, Christoph Klein, Marian Kukucka, Nicolas Merke, Volkmar Falk, Henryk Dreger, Christoph Knosalla, Felix Schoenrath, Axel Unbehaun
{"title":"心脏移植后左心瓣膜病的经导管治疗。","authors":"Hristian Hinkov, Luise Roehrich, Chong Bin Lee, Christoph Klein, Marian Kukucka, Nicolas Merke, Volkmar Falk, Henryk Dreger, Christoph Knosalla, Felix Schoenrath, Axel Unbehaun","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are rare in heart transplant (HTx) recipients, but their incidence increases with extended post-transplant survival. This study assesses the safety, efficacy and outcomes of transcatheter interventions in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional series of HTx patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) or mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) from March 2015 through April 2024 was analysed retrospectively. Both elective cases and patients in cardiac decompensation/cardiogenic shock were included. There were no exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were echocardiographic allograft function and Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3)/Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) success and safety composite end points. Secondary outcomes included symptom change, complications and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Nine patients underwent TAVI and 6 had M-TEER. The median age was 56 years, with a median of 17 years from HTx to valve intervention. A total of 46.7% (7/15) of the procedures were considered urgent/emergency. Improvements were noted in the left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure and tissue Doppler peak contraction velocity. The VARC-3/MVARC technical success was 100%; device success for TAVI was 93.3% and 83.3% for M-TEER. VARC-3 early safety was 66.7% for TAVI, and MVARC procedural success was 83.3% for M-TEER; 86.7% showed improved functional status. Median survival was 800 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVI and M-TEER were feasible and efficient in improving echocardiographic allograft function. Elective procedures were associated with a median survival of over 2 years. Survival outcomes varied based on procedure urgency. Close monitoring of AS/MR seems crucial in HTx patients, with timely intervention prior to decompensation/shock. Further multicentre studies are needed to establish management guidelines for AS/MR in HTx recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520617,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter management of left-sided valvular heart disease following heart transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Hristian Hinkov, Luise Roehrich, Chong Bin Lee, Christoph Klein, Marian Kukucka, Nicolas Merke, Volkmar Falk, Henryk Dreger, Christoph Knosalla, Felix Schoenrath, Axel Unbehaun\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are rare in heart transplant (HTx) recipients, but their incidence increases with extended post-transplant survival. This study assesses the safety, efficacy and outcomes of transcatheter interventions in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional series of HTx patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) or mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) from March 2015 through April 2024 was analysed retrospectively. Both elective cases and patients in cardiac decompensation/cardiogenic shock were included. There were no exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were echocardiographic allograft function and Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3)/Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) success and safety composite end points. Secondary outcomes included symptom change, complications and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Nine patients underwent TAVI and 6 had M-TEER. The median age was 56 years, with a median of 17 years from HTx to valve intervention. A total of 46.7% (7/15) of the procedures were considered urgent/emergency. Improvements were noted in the left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure and tissue Doppler peak contraction velocity. The VARC-3/MVARC technical success was 100%; device success for TAVI was 93.3% and 83.3% for M-TEER. VARC-3 early safety was 66.7% for TAVI, and MVARC procedural success was 83.3% for M-TEER; 86.7% showed improved functional status. Median survival was 800 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVI and M-TEER were feasible and efficient in improving echocardiographic allograft function. Elective procedures were associated with a median survival of over 2 years. Survival outcomes varied based on procedure urgency. Close monitoring of AS/MR seems crucial in HTx patients, with timely intervention prior to decompensation/shock. Further multicentre studies are needed to establish management guidelines for AS/MR in HTx recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transcatheter management of left-sided valvular heart disease following heart transplantation.
Objectives: Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are rare in heart transplant (HTx) recipients, but their incidence increases with extended post-transplant survival. This study assesses the safety, efficacy and outcomes of transcatheter interventions in this high-risk population.
Methods: An institutional series of HTx patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) or mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) from March 2015 through April 2024 was analysed retrospectively. Both elective cases and patients in cardiac decompensation/cardiogenic shock were included. There were no exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were echocardiographic allograft function and Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3)/Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) success and safety composite end points. Secondary outcomes included symptom change, complications and survival.
Results: A total of 15 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Nine patients underwent TAVI and 6 had M-TEER. The median age was 56 years, with a median of 17 years from HTx to valve intervention. A total of 46.7% (7/15) of the procedures were considered urgent/emergency. Improvements were noted in the left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure and tissue Doppler peak contraction velocity. The VARC-3/MVARC technical success was 100%; device success for TAVI was 93.3% and 83.3% for M-TEER. VARC-3 early safety was 66.7% for TAVI, and MVARC procedural success was 83.3% for M-TEER; 86.7% showed improved functional status. Median survival was 800 days.
Conclusions: TAVI and M-TEER were feasible and efficient in improving echocardiographic allograft function. Elective procedures were associated with a median survival of over 2 years. Survival outcomes varied based on procedure urgency. Close monitoring of AS/MR seems crucial in HTx patients, with timely intervention prior to decompensation/shock. Further multicentre studies are needed to establish management guidelines for AS/MR in HTx recipients.