护士对人性化护理的感知:ECCOE-Es问卷的验证。

Laia Wennberg-Capellades, Montserrat Rus-García, Laia Cruells-Francisco, Rosa María Collado-Cabezas, Xavier Teixidó-Huertas, Maria Luisa Martin-Ferreres
{"title":"护士对人性化护理的感知:ECCOE-Es问卷的验证。","authors":"Laia Wennberg-Capellades, Montserrat Rus-García, Laia Cruells-Francisco, Rosa María Collado-Cabezas, Xavier Teixidó-Huertas, Maria Luisa Martin-Ferreres","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To adapt and validate for use in Spain the ECCOE questionnaire for assessing nurse caring behaviours from the perspective of nurses; to apply the adapted questionnaire to a sample of hospital registered nurses in Spain and to examine the perceptions of humanised care behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre cross-sectional study. Validity evidence based on the ECCOE_Es internal structure through confirmatory factor analysis and convergent and divergent validity in the relationships with moral sensitivity and burnout, respectively. Reliability was also examined through Cronbach's alpha and temporal stability with Pearson's correlation of test scores. Descriptive and comparative analysis of nurses' responses to the ECCOE_Es was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 462 nurses' questionnaires were analysed. Temporal stability (r = 0,908) and internal consistency were adequate (α > 0,76 for the subscales and α = 0,96 for the total scale). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structure of the original instrument with 7 subscales. ECCOE-Es were positively correlated with moral sensitivity (r = 0,454) and negatively correlated with burnout (r = -0,265). Humanism subscale was perceived as the most important, whereas items related to individualised care were less frequently endorsed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECCOE's Spanish adaptation has adequate psychometric properties, and its original properties and structure are confirmed as a suitable tool for assessing nurses' perceptions of humanised care. Overall, they perceived themselves as delivering humanised care, there was a scope for improvement in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":"502250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' perception of humanised care: Validation of the ECCOE-Es questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Laia Wennberg-Capellades, Montserrat Rus-García, Laia Cruells-Francisco, Rosa María Collado-Cabezas, Xavier Teixidó-Huertas, Maria Luisa Martin-Ferreres\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To adapt and validate for use in Spain the ECCOE questionnaire for assessing nurse caring behaviours from the perspective of nurses; to apply the adapted questionnaire to a sample of hospital registered nurses in Spain and to examine the perceptions of humanised care behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre cross-sectional study. Validity evidence based on the ECCOE_Es internal structure through confirmatory factor analysis and convergent and divergent validity in the relationships with moral sensitivity and burnout, respectively. Reliability was also examined through Cronbach's alpha and temporal stability with Pearson's correlation of test scores. Descriptive and comparative analysis of nurses' responses to the ECCOE_Es was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 462 nurses' questionnaires were analysed. Temporal stability (r = 0,908) and internal consistency were adequate (α > 0,76 for the subscales and α = 0,96 for the total scale). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structure of the original instrument with 7 subscales. ECCOE-Es were positively correlated with moral sensitivity (r = 0,454) and negatively correlated with burnout (r = -0,265). Humanism subscale was perceived as the most important, whereas items related to individualised care were less frequently endorsed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECCOE's Spanish adaptation has adequate psychometric properties, and its original properties and structure are confirmed as a suitable tool for assessing nurses' perceptions of humanised care. Overall, they perceived themselves as delivering humanised care, there was a scope for improvement in this respect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:适应和验证在西班牙使用ECCOE问卷从护士的角度评估护士护理行为;将调整后的调查问卷应用于西班牙医院注册护士的样本,并检查对人性化护理行为的看法。方法:多中心横断面研究。通过验证性因子分析获得基于ECCOE_Es内部结构的效度证据,以及分别与道德敏感性和职业倦怠关系的收敛效度和发散效度。信度也通过Cronbach's alpha和时间稳定性与Pearson测验分数的相关性进行检验。对护士对ECCOE_Es的反应进行描述性和对比性分析。结果:共对462份护士问卷进行分析。时间稳定性(r = 0,908)和内部一致性较好(子量表α > = 0,76,总量表α = 0,96)。验证性因子分析支持原始仪器的7个分量表结构。ECCOE-Es与道德敏感性正相关(r= 0.454),与职业倦怠负相关(r= - 0.265)。人文主义子量表被认为是最重要的,而与个性化护理相关的项目则较少得到认可。结论:ECCOE的西班牙语适应性具有足够的心理测量特性,其原始特性和结构被确认为评估护士对人性化护理的看法的合适工具。总的来说,他们认为自己提供了人性化的护理,在这方面还有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' perception of humanised care: Validation of the ECCOE-Es questionnaire.

Aims: To adapt and validate for use in Spain the ECCOE questionnaire for assessing nurse caring behaviours from the perspective of nurses; to apply the adapted questionnaire to a sample of hospital registered nurses in Spain and to examine the perceptions of humanised care behaviours.

Methods: Multi-centre cross-sectional study. Validity evidence based on the ECCOE_Es internal structure through confirmatory factor analysis and convergent and divergent validity in the relationships with moral sensitivity and burnout, respectively. Reliability was also examined through Cronbach's alpha and temporal stability with Pearson's correlation of test scores. Descriptive and comparative analysis of nurses' responses to the ECCOE_Es was performed.

Results: A total of 462 nurses' questionnaires were analysed. Temporal stability (r = 0,908) and internal consistency were adequate (α > 0,76 for the subscales and α = 0,96 for the total scale). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the structure of the original instrument with 7 subscales. ECCOE-Es were positively correlated with moral sensitivity (r = 0,454) and negatively correlated with burnout (r = -0,265). Humanism subscale was perceived as the most important, whereas items related to individualised care were less frequently endorsed.

Conclusions: ECCOE's Spanish adaptation has adequate psychometric properties, and its original properties and structure are confirmed as a suitable tool for assessing nurses' perceptions of humanised care. Overall, they perceived themselves as delivering humanised care, there was a scope for improvement in this respect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信