探索ChatGPT 3.5从肿瘤笔记中提取结构化数据。

Ty J Skyles, Isaac J Freeman, Georgewilliam Kalibbala, David Davila-Garcia, Kendall Kiser, Silpa Raju, Adam Wilcox
{"title":"探索ChatGPT 3.5从肿瘤笔记中提取结构化数据。","authors":"Ty J Skyles, Isaac J Freeman, Georgewilliam Kalibbala, David Davila-Garcia, Kendall Kiser, Silpa Raju, Adam Wilcox","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In large-scale clinical informatics, there is a need to maximize the amount of usable data from electronic health records. With the adoption of large language models in medical research, there is potential to use them to extract structured data from unstructured clinical notes. We explored how ChatGPT could be used to improve data availability in cancer research. We assessed how GPT used clinical notes to answer six relevant clinical questions. Four prompt engineering strategies were used: zero-shot, zero-shot with context, few-shot, and few-shot with context. Few-shot prompting often decreased the accuracy of GPT outputs and context did not consistently improve accuracy. GPT extracted patients' Gleason scores and ages with an F1 score of 0.99 and it identified if patients received palliative care with and if patients were in pain with an F1 score of 0.86. Effective use of LLMs has potential to increase interoperability between healthcare and clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":"2025 ","pages":"518-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring ChatGPT 3.5 for structured data extraction from oncological notes.\",\"authors\":\"Ty J Skyles, Isaac J Freeman, Georgewilliam Kalibbala, David Davila-Garcia, Kendall Kiser, Silpa Raju, Adam Wilcox\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In large-scale clinical informatics, there is a need to maximize the amount of usable data from electronic health records. With the adoption of large language models in medical research, there is potential to use them to extract structured data from unstructured clinical notes. We explored how ChatGPT could be used to improve data availability in cancer research. We assessed how GPT used clinical notes to answer six relevant clinical questions. Four prompt engineering strategies were used: zero-shot, zero-shot with context, few-shot, and few-shot with context. Few-shot prompting often decreased the accuracy of GPT outputs and context did not consistently improve accuracy. GPT extracted patients' Gleason scores and ages with an F1 score of 0.99 and it identified if patients received palliative care with and if patients were in pain with an F1 score of 0.86. Effective use of LLMs has potential to increase interoperability between healthcare and clinical research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"518-526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大规模临床信息学中,需要最大限度地利用电子健康记录中的可用数据。随着在医学研究中采用大型语言模型,有可能使用它们从非结构化临床记录中提取结构化数据。我们探索了如何使用ChatGPT来提高癌症研究中的数据可用性。我们评估了GPT如何使用临床记录来回答六个相关的临床问题。使用了四种提示工程策略:零射击、零射击结合情境、少射击和少射击结合情境。少数镜头提示通常会降低GPT输出的准确性,并且上下文并没有始终提高准确性。GPT提取患者Gleason评分和年龄,F1评分为0.99,识别患者是否接受姑息治疗和患者是否有疼痛,F1评分为0.86。llm的有效使用有可能增加医疗保健和临床研究之间的互操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring ChatGPT 3.5 for structured data extraction from oncological notes.

In large-scale clinical informatics, there is a need to maximize the amount of usable data from electronic health records. With the adoption of large language models in medical research, there is potential to use them to extract structured data from unstructured clinical notes. We explored how ChatGPT could be used to improve data availability in cancer research. We assessed how GPT used clinical notes to answer six relevant clinical questions. Four prompt engineering strategies were used: zero-shot, zero-shot with context, few-shot, and few-shot with context. Few-shot prompting often decreased the accuracy of GPT outputs and context did not consistently improve accuracy. GPT extracted patients' Gleason scores and ages with an F1 score of 0.99 and it identified if patients received palliative care with and if patients were in pain with an F1 score of 0.86. Effective use of LLMs has potential to increase interoperability between healthcare and clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信