使用机器学习和生存分析确定神经退行性疾病和患者损伤风险的临床模式的重要性。

Kazi Noshin, Mary Regina Boland, Bojian Hou, Weiqing He, Victoria Lu, Carol Manning, Li Shen, Aidong Zhang
{"title":"使用机器学习和生存分析确定神经退行性疾病和患者损伤风险的临床模式的重要性。","authors":"Kazi Noshin, Mary Regina Boland, Bojian Hou, Weiqing He, Victoria Lu, Carol Manning, Li Shen, Aidong Zhang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Falls among the elderly and especially those with NeuroDegenerative Disorders (NDD) reduces life expectancy. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data for time-to-event survival analysis prediction of injuries, and role of sensitive attributes, e.g., Race, Ethnicity, Sex, in these models. We used multiple survival analysis methods on a cohort of 29,045 patients 65 years and older treated at PennMedicine for either NDD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), or another disease. We compare the algorithms and explore the role of multiple modalities on improving prediction of injuries among NDD patients, specifically medications and laboratory tests. Overall, we found that medication features resulted in either increased Hazard Ratios (HR) or reduced HR depending on the NDD type. We found that being of Black race significantly increased the risk offall/injury in the models that included only medication and sensitive attribute features. The combined model that used both modalities (medications and laboratory information) removed this relationship between being of Black race and increases in fall/injury. Therefore, we found that combining modalities in these survival models in the prediction offall/injury risk among NDD and MCI individuals results in findings that are robust to different Racial and Ethnic groups with no biases apparent in our final combined modality results. Furthermore, combining modalities (both medications and laboratory values) improved the survival analysis performance across multiple survival analysis methods, when compared using the C-index.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":"2025 ","pages":"385-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the Importance of Clinical Modalities for NeuroDegenerative Disorders and Risk of Patient Injury Using Machine Learning and Survival Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kazi Noshin, Mary Regina Boland, Bojian Hou, Weiqing He, Victoria Lu, Carol Manning, Li Shen, Aidong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Falls among the elderly and especially those with NeuroDegenerative Disorders (NDD) reduces life expectancy. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data for time-to-event survival analysis prediction of injuries, and role of sensitive attributes, e.g., Race, Ethnicity, Sex, in these models. We used multiple survival analysis methods on a cohort of 29,045 patients 65 years and older treated at PennMedicine for either NDD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), or another disease. We compare the algorithms and explore the role of multiple modalities on improving prediction of injuries among NDD patients, specifically medications and laboratory tests. Overall, we found that medication features resulted in either increased Hazard Ratios (HR) or reduced HR depending on the NDD type. We found that being of Black race significantly increased the risk offall/injury in the models that included only medication and sensitive attribute features. The combined model that used both modalities (medications and laboratory information) removed this relationship between being of Black race and increases in fall/injury. Therefore, we found that combining modalities in these survival models in the prediction offall/injury risk among NDD and MCI individuals results in findings that are robust to different Racial and Ethnic groups with no biases apparent in our final combined modality results. Furthermore, combining modalities (both medications and laboratory values) improved the survival analysis performance across multiple survival analysis methods, when compared using the C-index.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"385-394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150751/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人尤其是神经退行性疾病(NDD)患者的跌倒会降低预期寿命。本研究的目的是探索机器学习在电子健康记录(EHR)数据中的作用,以进行损伤的时间到事件生存分析预测,以及敏感属性(如种族、民族、性别)在这些模型中的作用。我们对29,045名65岁及以上在宾夕法尼亚大学医学中心接受NDD、轻度认知障碍(MCI)或其他疾病治疗的患者进行了多种生存分析方法。我们比较了算法,并探讨了多种模式在改善NDD患者损伤预测方面的作用,特别是药物和实验室检查。总体而言,我们发现药物特征导致NDD类型的风险比(HR)增加或降低。我们发现,在只包含药物和敏感属性特征的模型中,黑人显著增加了跌倒/受伤的风险。使用两种模式(药物和实验室信息)的组合模型消除了黑人种族与跌倒/受伤增加之间的关系。因此,我们发现,在预测NDD和MCI个体的跌倒/受伤风险时,这些生存模型中的组合模式导致的结果对不同种族和民族群体都是稳健的,在我们的最终组合模式结果中没有明显的偏差。此外,当使用c指数进行比较时,组合模式(药物和实验室值)提高了多种生存分析方法的生存分析性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining the Importance of Clinical Modalities for NeuroDegenerative Disorders and Risk of Patient Injury Using Machine Learning and Survival Analysis.

Falls among the elderly and especially those with NeuroDegenerative Disorders (NDD) reduces life expectancy. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data for time-to-event survival analysis prediction of injuries, and role of sensitive attributes, e.g., Race, Ethnicity, Sex, in these models. We used multiple survival analysis methods on a cohort of 29,045 patients 65 years and older treated at PennMedicine for either NDD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), or another disease. We compare the algorithms and explore the role of multiple modalities on improving prediction of injuries among NDD patients, specifically medications and laboratory tests. Overall, we found that medication features resulted in either increased Hazard Ratios (HR) or reduced HR depending on the NDD type. We found that being of Black race significantly increased the risk offall/injury in the models that included only medication and sensitive attribute features. The combined model that used both modalities (medications and laboratory information) removed this relationship between being of Black race and increases in fall/injury. Therefore, we found that combining modalities in these survival models in the prediction offall/injury risk among NDD and MCI individuals results in findings that are robust to different Racial and Ethnic groups with no biases apparent in our final combined modality results. Furthermore, combining modalities (both medications and laboratory values) improved the survival analysis performance across multiple survival analysis methods, when compared using the C-index.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信