Nattanit Songthangtham, Ratchada Jantraporn, Elizabeth Weinfurter, Gyorgy Simon, Wei Pan, Sripriya Rajamani, Steven G Johnson
{"title":"评估提取的电子健康记录队列的标准化指南：范围审查。","authors":"Nattanit Songthangtham, Ratchada Jantraporn, Elizabeth Weinfurter, Gyorgy Simon, Wei Pan, Sripriya Rajamani, Steven G Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing how accurately a cohort extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) represents the intended target population, or cohort fitness, is critical but often overlooked in secondary EHR data use. This scoping review aimed to (1) identify guidelines for assessing cohort fitness and (2) determine their thoroughness by examining whether they offer sufficient detail and computable methods for researchers. This scoping review follows the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and is refined based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklists. Searches were performed in Medline, Embase, and Scopus. From 1,904 results, 30 articles and 2 additional references were reviewed. Nine articles (28.13%) include a framework for evaluating cohort fitness but only 5 (15.63%) contain sufficient details and quantitative methodologies. Overall, a more comprehensive guideline that provides best practices for measuring the cohort fitness is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":"2025 ","pages":"527-536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nattanit Songthangtham, Ratchada Jantraporn, Elizabeth Weinfurter, Gyorgy Simon, Wei Pan, Sripriya Rajamani, Steven G Johnson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing how accurately a cohort extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) represents the intended target population, or cohort fitness, is critical but often overlooked in secondary EHR data use. This scoping review aimed to (1) identify guidelines for assessing cohort fitness and (2) determine their thoroughness by examining whether they offer sufficient detail and computable methods for researchers. This scoping review follows the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and is refined based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklists. Searches were performed in Medline, Embase, and Scopus. From 1,904 results, 30 articles and 2 additional references were reviewed. Nine articles (28.13%) include a framework for evaluating cohort fitness but only 5 (15.63%) contain sufficient details and quantitative methodologies. Overall, a more comprehensive guideline that provides best practices for measuring the cohort fitness is still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"527-536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.
Assessing how accurately a cohort extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) represents the intended target population, or cohort fitness, is critical but often overlooked in secondary EHR data use. This scoping review aimed to (1) identify guidelines for assessing cohort fitness and (2) determine their thoroughness by examining whether they offer sufficient detail and computable methods for researchers. This scoping review follows the JBI guidance for scoping reviews and is refined based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklists. Searches were performed in Medline, Embase, and Scopus. From 1,904 results, 30 articles and 2 additional references were reviewed. Nine articles (28.13%) include a framework for evaluating cohort fitness but only 5 (15.63%) contain sufficient details and quantitative methodologies. Overall, a more comprehensive guideline that provides best practices for measuring the cohort fitness is still needed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
