改良剂22在综合医疗系统内桡骨远端骨折手术治疗中的应用

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexander Mayers, Mahmoud Mahmoud, Yagiz Ozdag, Jessica L Koshinski, Victoria C Garcia, Joel C Klena, Louis C Grandizio
{"title":"改良剂22在综合医疗系统内桡骨远端骨折手术治疗中的应用","authors":"Alexander Mayers, Mahmoud Mahmoud, Yagiz Ozdag, Jessica L Koshinski, Victoria C Garcia, Joel C Klena, Louis C Grandizio","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Modifier 22 is a billing modifier that may provide additional reimbursement and can be used for complex operative procedures requiring greater surgeon time or effort. However, Modifier 22 utilization has been infrequently analyzed in the upper extremity. Our purpose was to assess patient, injury, and surgeon characteristics associated with Modifier 22 utilization associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of operatively treated adult DRFs between 2016 and 2020 was conducted within a single, integrated health care system. We recorded patient, surgeon, and injury characteristics as well as the utilization of a Modifier 22 code. A binary multiple logistic regression model was constructed from patient, injury and surgeon demographic factors. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one surgeons performed 934 included DRF cases, of which 101 cases (11%) used a Modifier 22 code. Modifier 22 utilization ranged from 0% to 38% by surgeon. Hand fellowship training was significantly associated with increased Modifier 22 utilization (OR 3.53, 95% CI [1.95-6.38]). Significantly increased Modifier 22 utilization was also associated with government/military insurance compared to private insurance (OR 9.63, 95% CI [1.89-49.12]), open fractures (OR 4.94, 95% CI [1.42-17.24]), and increased operative time (OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.03-1.08]). \"Increased service intensity or procedural time\" and \"increased technical difficulty\" were the most commonly cited coding justifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For DRF, Modifier 22 utilization varies widely by the surgeon. Hand fellowship training, insurance status, and open fractures were significantly associated with increased utilization. Fracture classification (exclusive of open fractures) and body mass index were not associated with higher rates of Modifier 22 utilization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These data suggest that utilization of Modifier 22 codes associated with DRF is primarily driven by surgeon-specific billing practices, training and case length rather than complex fracture patterns and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modifier 22 Use in Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures Within an Integrated Health Care System.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Mayers, Mahmoud Mahmoud, Yagiz Ozdag, Jessica L Koshinski, Victoria C Garcia, Joel C Klena, Louis C Grandizio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Modifier 22 is a billing modifier that may provide additional reimbursement and can be used for complex operative procedures requiring greater surgeon time or effort. However, Modifier 22 utilization has been infrequently analyzed in the upper extremity. Our purpose was to assess patient, injury, and surgeon characteristics associated with Modifier 22 utilization associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of operatively treated adult DRFs between 2016 and 2020 was conducted within a single, integrated health care system. We recorded patient, surgeon, and injury characteristics as well as the utilization of a Modifier 22 code. A binary multiple logistic regression model was constructed from patient, injury and surgeon demographic factors. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one surgeons performed 934 included DRF cases, of which 101 cases (11%) used a Modifier 22 code. Modifier 22 utilization ranged from 0% to 38% by surgeon. Hand fellowship training was significantly associated with increased Modifier 22 utilization (OR 3.53, 95% CI [1.95-6.38]). Significantly increased Modifier 22 utilization was also associated with government/military insurance compared to private insurance (OR 9.63, 95% CI [1.89-49.12]), open fractures (OR 4.94, 95% CI [1.42-17.24]), and increased operative time (OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.03-1.08]). \\\"Increased service intensity or procedural time\\\" and \\\"increased technical difficulty\\\" were the most commonly cited coding justifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For DRF, Modifier 22 utilization varies widely by the surgeon. Hand fellowship training, insurance status, and open fractures were significantly associated with increased utilization. Fracture classification (exclusive of open fractures) and body mass index were not associated with higher rates of Modifier 22 utilization.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These data suggest that utilization of Modifier 22 codes associated with DRF is primarily driven by surgeon-specific billing practices, training and case length rather than complex fracture patterns and obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:修饰符22是一种计费修饰符,可提供额外的报销,可用于需要更多外科医生时间或精力的复杂手术。然而,修饰语22在上肢的使用很少被分析。我们的目的是评估与桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)手术治疗相关的Modifier 22应用相关的患者、损伤和外科医生特征。方法:在一个单一的综合医疗保健系统中,对2016年至2020年接受手术治疗的成人DRFs进行回顾性图表回顾。我们记录了患者、外科医生和损伤特征以及Modifier 22代码的使用情况。从患者、损伤和外科医生的人口学因素中构建二元多元logistic回归模型。报告了比值比(OR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:21位外科医生完成934例纳入DRF病例,其中101例(11%)使用Modifier 22编码。修正器22的使用范围从0%到38%的外科医生。手部培训与Modifier 22的使用显著相关(OR 3.53, 95% CI[1.95-6.38])。与私人保险相比,政府/军事保险(OR 9.63, 95% CI[1.89-49.12])、开放性骨折(OR 4.94, 95% CI[1.42-17.24])和手术时间(OR 1.05, 95% CI[1.03-1.08])也显著增加了Modifier 22的使用。“增加服务强度或程序时间”和“增加技术难度”是最常被引用的编码理由。结论:对于DRF,不同的外科医生对改良剂22的使用差异很大。手部培训、保险状况和开放性骨折与使用率增加显著相关。骨折分类(不包括开放性骨折)和体重指数与Modifier 22的高使用率无关。临床相关性:这些数据表明,与DRF相关的Modifier 22代码的使用主要是由外科医生特定的计费实践、培训和病例长度驱动的,而不是复杂的骨折模式和肥胖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modifier 22 Use in Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures Within an Integrated Health Care System.

Purpose: Modifier 22 is a billing modifier that may provide additional reimbursement and can be used for complex operative procedures requiring greater surgeon time or effort. However, Modifier 22 utilization has been infrequently analyzed in the upper extremity. Our purpose was to assess patient, injury, and surgeon characteristics associated with Modifier 22 utilization associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs).

Methods: A retrospective chart review of operatively treated adult DRFs between 2016 and 2020 was conducted within a single, integrated health care system. We recorded patient, surgeon, and injury characteristics as well as the utilization of a Modifier 22 code. A binary multiple logistic regression model was constructed from patient, injury and surgeon demographic factors. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

Results: Twenty-one surgeons performed 934 included DRF cases, of which 101 cases (11%) used a Modifier 22 code. Modifier 22 utilization ranged from 0% to 38% by surgeon. Hand fellowship training was significantly associated with increased Modifier 22 utilization (OR 3.53, 95% CI [1.95-6.38]). Significantly increased Modifier 22 utilization was also associated with government/military insurance compared to private insurance (OR 9.63, 95% CI [1.89-49.12]), open fractures (OR 4.94, 95% CI [1.42-17.24]), and increased operative time (OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.03-1.08]). "Increased service intensity or procedural time" and "increased technical difficulty" were the most commonly cited coding justifications.

Conclusions: For DRF, Modifier 22 utilization varies widely by the surgeon. Hand fellowship training, insurance status, and open fractures were significantly associated with increased utilization. Fracture classification (exclusive of open fractures) and body mass index were not associated with higher rates of Modifier 22 utilization.

Clinical relevance: These data suggest that utilization of Modifier 22 codes associated with DRF is primarily driven by surgeon-specific billing practices, training and case length rather than complex fracture patterns and obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信