喉切除术教育和培训资源:资源的环境扫描。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Laura-Jayne Watson, Emer Fahy, David W Hamilton, Linda Sharp, Vicky Thornton, Joanne M Patterson
{"title":"喉切除术教育和培训资源:资源的环境扫描。","authors":"Laura-Jayne Watson, Emer Fahy, David W Hamilton, Linda Sharp, Vicky Thornton, Joanne M Patterson","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02606-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many settings, head and neck cancer (HNC) services are centralized in large hospitals, meaning that community input from HNC specialists can be lacking. Community healthcare professionals often require laryngectomy-specific education and training to provide optimal care to people at home. However, laryngectomy-specific education/training is often sporadic and varies between centres, making it difficult to achieve standardisation in healthcare professionals' laryngectomy knowledge and skills. This study aimed to identify and critically review existing laryngectomy education/training resources for healthcare professionals, which include elements applicable to community care. We used environmental scanning to systematically and comprehensively identify and examine all available education/training resources which had an element of education and/or training applicable to community laryngectomy care. Eligible resources were reviewed for training-specific details, laryngectomy-specific details, evaluation method, accessibility, and patient and public involvement (PPI). A total of 6655 resources were screened; 49 were eligible for data extraction. There was wide variability in the level of laryngectomy-specific content in the resources. PPI in development was lacking, and data detailing the impact of resources on healthcare professionals' knowledge/skills and patient outcomes was sparse. This is the first study to systematically identify and appraise laryngectomy education/training resources which have applicability to community care. There is not one consistent approach to education/training development method, content, delivery, or evaluation, likely rendering these ineffective and lacking impact. Community-specific laryngectomy education and training, with clear implementation and evaluation, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngectomy Education and Training Resources: An Environmental Scan of Resources.\",\"authors\":\"Laura-Jayne Watson, Emer Fahy, David W Hamilton, Linda Sharp, Vicky Thornton, Joanne M Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02606-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In many settings, head and neck cancer (HNC) services are centralized in large hospitals, meaning that community input from HNC specialists can be lacking. Community healthcare professionals often require laryngectomy-specific education and training to provide optimal care to people at home. However, laryngectomy-specific education/training is often sporadic and varies between centres, making it difficult to achieve standardisation in healthcare professionals' laryngectomy knowledge and skills. This study aimed to identify and critically review existing laryngectomy education/training resources for healthcare professionals, which include elements applicable to community care. We used environmental scanning to systematically and comprehensively identify and examine all available education/training resources which had an element of education and/or training applicable to community laryngectomy care. Eligible resources were reviewed for training-specific details, laryngectomy-specific details, evaluation method, accessibility, and patient and public involvement (PPI). A total of 6655 resources were screened; 49 were eligible for data extraction. There was wide variability in the level of laryngectomy-specific content in the resources. PPI in development was lacking, and data detailing the impact of resources on healthcare professionals' knowledge/skills and patient outcomes was sparse. This is the first study to systematically identify and appraise laryngectomy education/training resources which have applicability to community care. There is not one consistent approach to education/training development method, content, delivery, or evaluation, likely rendering these ineffective and lacking impact. Community-specific laryngectomy education and training, with clear implementation and evaluation, is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02606-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02606-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多情况下,头颈癌(HNC)服务集中在大型医院,这意味着可能缺乏来自头颈癌专家的社区投入。社区卫生保健专业人员通常需要喉部切除术的专门教育和培训,以便在家中为患者提供最佳护理。然而,针对喉切除术的教育/培训往往是零星的,各中心之间也各不相同,因此很难实现保健专业人员喉切除术知识和技能的标准化。本研究旨在确定并批判性地回顾现有的喉切除术教育/培训资源,其中包括适用于社区护理的要素。我们使用环境扫描系统和全面地识别和检查所有可用的教育/培训资源,这些资源具有适用于社区喉切除术护理的教育和/或培训元素。对培训特异性细节、喉切除术特异性细节、评估方法、可及性以及患者和公众参与(PPI)进行了合格的资源审查。共筛选资源6655项;49项符合数据提取条件。资源中喉切除术特异性内容的水平有很大的差异。开发中的PPI缺乏,详细说明资源对医疗保健专业人员的知识/技能和患者预后影响的数据很少。这是第一个系统地识别和评估适用于社区护理的喉切除术教育/培训资源的研究。没有一种一致的教育/培训开发方法、内容、交付或评估方法,可能导致这些方法无效且缺乏影响。需要社区特有的喉切除术教育和培训,并有明确的实施和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laryngectomy Education and Training Resources: An Environmental Scan of Resources.

In many settings, head and neck cancer (HNC) services are centralized in large hospitals, meaning that community input from HNC specialists can be lacking. Community healthcare professionals often require laryngectomy-specific education and training to provide optimal care to people at home. However, laryngectomy-specific education/training is often sporadic and varies between centres, making it difficult to achieve standardisation in healthcare professionals' laryngectomy knowledge and skills. This study aimed to identify and critically review existing laryngectomy education/training resources for healthcare professionals, which include elements applicable to community care. We used environmental scanning to systematically and comprehensively identify and examine all available education/training resources which had an element of education and/or training applicable to community laryngectomy care. Eligible resources were reviewed for training-specific details, laryngectomy-specific details, evaluation method, accessibility, and patient and public involvement (PPI). A total of 6655 resources were screened; 49 were eligible for data extraction. There was wide variability in the level of laryngectomy-specific content in the resources. PPI in development was lacking, and data detailing the impact of resources on healthcare professionals' knowledge/skills and patient outcomes was sparse. This is the first study to systematically identify and appraise laryngectomy education/training resources which have applicability to community care. There is not one consistent approach to education/training development method, content, delivery, or evaluation, likely rendering these ineffective and lacking impact. Community-specific laryngectomy education and training, with clear implementation and evaluation, is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信