美国早期乳腺癌患者使用辅助骨调节剂的模式

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Nicole Odzer, Rachel Jaber Chehayeb, Sarah E Schellhorn, Maryam Lustberg, Cary P Gross, Do Lee, Julia Foldi
{"title":"美国早期乳腺癌患者使用辅助骨调节剂的模式","authors":"Nicole Odzer, Rachel Jaber Chehayeb, Sarah E Schellhorn, Maryam Lustberg, Cary P Gross, Do Lee, Julia Foldi","doi":"10.1186/s13058-025-02062-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Based on improved survival, the 2017 ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario clinical guidelines (ACGD) recommended consideration of adjuvant bisphosphonates for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, small survey-based studies suggest inconsistent prescribing. This study evaluated receipt of adjuvant bone modifying agents (BMAs) in the United States before and after publication of the 2017 ACGD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide retrospective cohort study used a deidentified electronic health record-derived database to identify patients diagnosed with stage I-III EBC treated at health care practices from 2012 to 2019. We defined adjuvant BMA (bisphosphonates or denosumab) use as first dose received within 24 months of EBC diagnosis. We used Chi-squared and multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant BMAs pre- and post-ACGD and identify factors associated with receipt of any BMA as well as bisphosphonates alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 11,470 patients. Most patients were 50 years of age or older (82%), and had stage I (57%), node-negative (70%) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (76%) breast cancer. Patients diagnosed post-ACGD (2017-19) were more likely to receive adjuvant BMAs (9%) than patients diagnosed in earlier years (7.4%; odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.42; p = 0.002). Post-menopausal status, age ≥ 50, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and coexisting bone loss diagnoses were significantly associated with increased receipt of adjuvant BMAs. Among BMA recipients, 65.8% received denosumab only, 32.6% received bisphosphonates only, and 1.4% received both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even after release of the ACGD guidelines, adjuvant BMA prescribing was low, and the majority of patients who received BMA did not receive bisphosphonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of adjuvant bone modifying agent use in patients with early-stage breast cancer in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Odzer, Rachel Jaber Chehayeb, Sarah E Schellhorn, Maryam Lustberg, Cary P Gross, Do Lee, Julia Foldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13058-025-02062-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Based on improved survival, the 2017 ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario clinical guidelines (ACGD) recommended consideration of adjuvant bisphosphonates for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, small survey-based studies suggest inconsistent prescribing. This study evaluated receipt of adjuvant bone modifying agents (BMAs) in the United States before and after publication of the 2017 ACGD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide retrospective cohort study used a deidentified electronic health record-derived database to identify patients diagnosed with stage I-III EBC treated at health care practices from 2012 to 2019. We defined adjuvant BMA (bisphosphonates or denosumab) use as first dose received within 24 months of EBC diagnosis. We used Chi-squared and multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant BMAs pre- and post-ACGD and identify factors associated with receipt of any BMA as well as bisphosphonates alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 11,470 patients. Most patients were 50 years of age or older (82%), and had stage I (57%), node-negative (70%) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (76%) breast cancer. Patients diagnosed post-ACGD (2017-19) were more likely to receive adjuvant BMAs (9%) than patients diagnosed in earlier years (7.4%; odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.42; p = 0.002). Post-menopausal status, age ≥ 50, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and coexisting bone loss diagnoses were significantly associated with increased receipt of adjuvant BMAs. Among BMA recipients, 65.8% received denosumab only, 32.6% received bisphosphonates only, and 1.4% received both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even after release of the ACGD guidelines, adjuvant BMA prescribing was low, and the majority of patients who received BMA did not receive bisphosphonates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02062-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02062-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于提高生存率,2017年ASCO和安大略癌症护理临床指南(ACGD)推荐绝经后早期乳腺癌(EBC)妇女考虑使用辅助双膦酸盐。然而,基于小型调查的研究表明处方不一致。本研究评估了2017年ACGD发布前后美国辅助骨修饰剂(BMAs)的接受情况。方法:这项全国性的回顾性队列研究使用了一个未识别的电子健康记录衍生数据库,以识别2012年至2019年在医疗保健实践中被诊断为I-III期EBC的患者。我们将辅助BMA(双膦酸盐或地诺单抗)的使用定义为EBC诊断24个月内接受的首次剂量。我们使用卡方和多变量logistic回归分析来比较acgd前后接受辅助性BMA的患者比例,并确定与接受任何BMA和单独使用双膦酸盐相关的因素。结果:我们的队列包括11,470例患者。大多数患者年龄在50岁或以上(82%),患有I期(57%),淋巴结阴性(70%)和雌激素受体(ER)阳性(76%)乳腺癌。诊断为acgd后(2017- 2019)的患者接受辅助bma的可能性(9%)高于早期诊断的患者(7.4%;优势比[OR] 1.23;95%置信区间(CI) 1.08-1.42;p = 0.002)。绝经后状态、年龄≥50岁、接受辅助化疗和内分泌治疗以及同时存在骨质流失诊断与辅助性bma接受增加显著相关。在BMA接受者中,65.8%的人只接受denosumab治疗,32.6%的人只接受双膦酸盐治疗,1.4%的人两者都接受。结论:即使在ACGD指南发布后,辅助性BMA处方也很低,并且大多数接受BMA的患者没有接受双磷酸盐治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of adjuvant bone modifying agent use in patients with early-stage breast cancer in the United States.

Purpose: Based on improved survival, the 2017 ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario clinical guidelines (ACGD) recommended consideration of adjuvant bisphosphonates for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, small survey-based studies suggest inconsistent prescribing. This study evaluated receipt of adjuvant bone modifying agents (BMAs) in the United States before and after publication of the 2017 ACGD.

Methods: This nationwide retrospective cohort study used a deidentified electronic health record-derived database to identify patients diagnosed with stage I-III EBC treated at health care practices from 2012 to 2019. We defined adjuvant BMA (bisphosphonates or denosumab) use as first dose received within 24 months of EBC diagnosis. We used Chi-squared and multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant BMAs pre- and post-ACGD and identify factors associated with receipt of any BMA as well as bisphosphonates alone.

Results: Our cohort included 11,470 patients. Most patients were 50 years of age or older (82%), and had stage I (57%), node-negative (70%) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (76%) breast cancer. Patients diagnosed post-ACGD (2017-19) were more likely to receive adjuvant BMAs (9%) than patients diagnosed in earlier years (7.4%; odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.42; p = 0.002). Post-menopausal status, age ≥ 50, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and coexisting bone loss diagnoses were significantly associated with increased receipt of adjuvant BMAs. Among BMA recipients, 65.8% received denosumab only, 32.6% received bisphosphonates only, and 1.4% received both.

Conclusions: Even after release of the ACGD guidelines, adjuvant BMA prescribing was low, and the majority of patients who received BMA did not receive bisphosphonates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信