使用原子能机构TRS-398议定书及其修订版进行参考剂量测量的量化和比较。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mohammad Abdul Fatha, Sathiya Raj, Y S Pawar, Sathiyan Saminathan
{"title":"使用原子能机构TRS-398议定书及其修订版进行参考剂量测量的量化和比较。","authors":"Mohammad Abdul Fatha, Sathiya Raj, Y S Pawar, Sathiyan Saminathan","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00925-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a protocol named Technical Report Series (TRS-398) to measure the absorbed dose in water for external radiotherapy beams. It provides a unified approach for using calibrated ionization chambers that are traceable to standard laboratories in determining the absorbed dose to water. The objective of the study was to compare the reference dosimetry [dose at 10 cm depth ( <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> )] between TRS-398 and its revised version. Reference dosimetry was performed for flattened photon beam with nominal energies of 6, 10, and 15 MV as well as flattening filter free (FFF) beam of energies 6 FFF and 10 FFF based on the guidelines of both TRS-398 and its revised version using two different ionization chambers of varying sensitive volumes such as 0.65 cm<sup>3</sup> (FC65-G) & 0.13 cm<sup>3</sup> (CC13) IBA ionization chambers with calibration coefficient traceable to absorbed dose to water (D<sub>w</sub>) standards. The comparison of absorbed dose at 10 cm ( <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> ) depth using both protocols with FC65-G chamber shows a difference ranging from 0.40 to 0.63% in FF beams and 0.03 to 0.05% in FFF beams. For CC13 chamber, the difference ranged from -0.60 to -0.77% in FF beams and -0.40 to -0.50% in FFF beams. The differences in absorbed dose between TRS-398 old and revised protocols were evaluated and a variation of up to 0.63% in <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> was observed for FC65-G and -0.77% in <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> was observed for CC13 chamber. The use of old <math><msub><mi>k</mi> <mrow><mi>Q</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msub><mi>Q</mi> <mi>O</mi></msub> </mrow> </msub> </math> value affects the reference dose measurements, which overestimates the results by an average of 0.5%. The use of cross-calibrated chamber following the old protocol in determining the <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> underestimates the results by maximum of -0.77% in FF beams and -0.5% in FFF beams.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification and comparison of the reference dose measurements using IAEA TRS-398 protocols and its revised version.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abdul Fatha, Sathiya Raj, Y S Pawar, Sathiyan Saminathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-025-00925-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a protocol named Technical Report Series (TRS-398) to measure the absorbed dose in water for external radiotherapy beams. It provides a unified approach for using calibrated ionization chambers that are traceable to standard laboratories in determining the absorbed dose to water. The objective of the study was to compare the reference dosimetry [dose at 10 cm depth ( <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> )] between TRS-398 and its revised version. Reference dosimetry was performed for flattened photon beam with nominal energies of 6, 10, and 15 MV as well as flattening filter free (FFF) beam of energies 6 FFF and 10 FFF based on the guidelines of both TRS-398 and its revised version using two different ionization chambers of varying sensitive volumes such as 0.65 cm<sup>3</sup> (FC65-G) & 0.13 cm<sup>3</sup> (CC13) IBA ionization chambers with calibration coefficient traceable to absorbed dose to water (D<sub>w</sub>) standards. The comparison of absorbed dose at 10 cm ( <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> ) depth using both protocols with FC65-G chamber shows a difference ranging from 0.40 to 0.63% in FF beams and 0.03 to 0.05% in FFF beams. For CC13 chamber, the difference ranged from -0.60 to -0.77% in FF beams and -0.40 to -0.50% in FFF beams. The differences in absorbed dose between TRS-398 old and revised protocols were evaluated and a variation of up to 0.63% in <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> was observed for FC65-G and -0.77% in <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> was observed for CC13 chamber. The use of old <math><msub><mi>k</mi> <mrow><mi>Q</mi> <mo>,</mo> <msub><mi>Q</mi> <mi>O</mi></msub> </mrow> </msub> </math> value affects the reference dose measurements, which overestimates the results by an average of 0.5%. The use of cross-calibrated chamber following the old protocol in determining the <math><msub><mi>D</mi> <mn>10</mn></msub> </math> underestimates the results by maximum of -0.77% in FF beams and -0.5% in FFF beams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00925-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00925-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际原子能机构(原子能机构)发布了一项名为技术报告系列(TRS-398)的方案,以测量外部放射治疗光束在水中的吸收剂量。它提供了一种统一的方法,使用可追溯到标准实验室的校准电离室来确定对水的吸收剂量。本研究的目的是比较TRS-398及其修订版本的参考剂量学[10 cm深度剂量(d10)]。根据TRS-398及其修订版的指导方针,对标称能量为6、10和15 MV的平坦光子束以及能量为6 FFF和10 FFF的平坦无滤波器(FFF)光束进行参考剂量测定,使用两种不同敏感体积的电离室,如0.65 cm3 (FC65-G)和0.13 cm3 (CC13) IBA电离室,校准系数可溯源到吸收剂量到水(Dw)标准。两种方案与FC65-G腔室在10 cm (d10)深度处的吸收剂量比较表明,FF束的差异为0.40 ~ 0.63%,FFF束的差异为0.03 ~ 0.05%。对于CC13室,FF光束的差异范围为-0.60 ~ -0.77%,FFF光束的差异范围为-0.40 ~ -0.50%。评估了TRS-398旧方案和修订方案之间的吸收剂量差异,FC65-G的d10变化高达0.63%,CC13的d10变化为-0.77%。使用旧的k Q、Q O值会影响参考剂量测量,使测量结果平均高估0.5%。在确定d10时,按照旧的方案使用交叉校准室,在FF光束中最大低估了-0.77%,在FFF光束中最大低估了-0.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification and comparison of the reference dose measurements using IAEA TRS-398 protocols and its revised version.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a protocol named Technical Report Series (TRS-398) to measure the absorbed dose in water for external radiotherapy beams. It provides a unified approach for using calibrated ionization chambers that are traceable to standard laboratories in determining the absorbed dose to water. The objective of the study was to compare the reference dosimetry [dose at 10 cm depth ( D 10 )] between TRS-398 and its revised version. Reference dosimetry was performed for flattened photon beam with nominal energies of 6, 10, and 15 MV as well as flattening filter free (FFF) beam of energies 6 FFF and 10 FFF based on the guidelines of both TRS-398 and its revised version using two different ionization chambers of varying sensitive volumes such as 0.65 cm3 (FC65-G) & 0.13 cm3 (CC13) IBA ionization chambers with calibration coefficient traceable to absorbed dose to water (Dw) standards. The comparison of absorbed dose at 10 cm ( D 10 ) depth using both protocols with FC65-G chamber shows a difference ranging from 0.40 to 0.63% in FF beams and 0.03 to 0.05% in FFF beams. For CC13 chamber, the difference ranged from -0.60 to -0.77% in FF beams and -0.40 to -0.50% in FFF beams. The differences in absorbed dose between TRS-398 old and revised protocols were evaluated and a variation of up to 0.63% in D 10 was observed for FC65-G and -0.77% in D 10 was observed for CC13 chamber. The use of old k Q , Q O value affects the reference dose measurements, which overestimates the results by an average of 0.5%. The use of cross-calibrated chamber following the old protocol in determining the D 10 underestimates the results by maximum of -0.77% in FF beams and -0.5% in FFF beams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信