有意义地实现互操作性任务:对技术政策助理部长真实世界测试实践的审查。

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf044
Jessica L Handley, Alicia Farlese, Sophia Lager, Ajit A Dhavle, Shahzad Ahmad, Anna Mathias, Raj M Ratwani
{"title":"有意义地实现互操作性任务:对技术政策助理部长真实世界测试实践的审查。","authors":"Jessica L Handley, Alicia Farlese, Sophia Lager, Ajit A Dhavle, Shahzad Ahmad, Anna Mathias, Raj M Ratwani","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analyzed interoperability-related Real World Testing results to identify whether developers are providing meaningful results with the appropriate context to enable stakeholders to understand the Certified Health IT conformance and interoperability when deployed in production environments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study analyzed components of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy's transitions of care criterion Real World Testing results of 5 inpatient and 5 ambulatory health IT developers with the largest market share.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Developers provided interoperability measures; however, none of the developers' presented results in a meaningful way with the appropriate context to understand product interoperability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that developers with ASTP/Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) Certified Health IT modules are not providing interoperability transparency through Real World Testing as required by the ONC Health IT Certification Program and intended by the 21st Century Cures Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clearer developer guidance and actual metric requirements on Real World Testing may be required and the authorized certification bodies, who review developer results, may need to more closely inspect reports to look at the quality of reported results.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"ooaf044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meaningfully meeting the interoperability mandate: a review of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy Real World Testing practices.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L Handley, Alicia Farlese, Sophia Lager, Ajit A Dhavle, Shahzad Ahmad, Anna Mathias, Raj M Ratwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analyzed interoperability-related Real World Testing results to identify whether developers are providing meaningful results with the appropriate context to enable stakeholders to understand the Certified Health IT conformance and interoperability when deployed in production environments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study analyzed components of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy's transitions of care criterion Real World Testing results of 5 inpatient and 5 ambulatory health IT developers with the largest market share.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Developers provided interoperability measures; however, none of the developers' presented results in a meaningful way with the appropriate context to understand product interoperability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that developers with ASTP/Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) Certified Health IT modules are not providing interoperability transparency through Real World Testing as required by the ONC Health IT Certification Program and intended by the 21st Century Cures Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clearer developer guidance and actual metric requirements on Real World Testing may be required and the authorized certification bodies, who review developer results, may need to more closely inspect reports to look at the quality of reported results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"ooaf044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:我们分析了与互操作性相关的真实世界测试结果,以确定开发人员是否在适当的上下文中提供了有意义的结果,从而使利益相关者能够在部署到生产环境中时理解认证健康IT的一致性和互操作性。材料和方法:本定性研究分析了技术政策助理部长护理标准转变的组成部分,对5个市场份额最大的住院和门诊医疗IT开发人员进行了真实世界测试。结果:开发人员提供了互操作性措施;然而,没有一个开发人员以一种有意义的方式呈现结果,并提供适当的上下文来理解产品互操作性。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,ASTP/国家协调办公室(ONC)认证的健康IT模块的开发者没有按照ONC健康IT认证计划和21世纪治愈法案的要求,通过真实世界测试提供互操作性透明度。结论:可能需要更清晰的开发人员指导和真实世界测试的实际度量需求,并且审查开发人员结果的授权认证机构可能需要更仔细地检查报告,以查看报告结果的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meaningfully meeting the interoperability mandate: a review of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy Real World Testing practices.

Objectives: We analyzed interoperability-related Real World Testing results to identify whether developers are providing meaningful results with the appropriate context to enable stakeholders to understand the Certified Health IT conformance and interoperability when deployed in production environments.

Materials and methods: This qualitative study analyzed components of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy's transitions of care criterion Real World Testing results of 5 inpatient and 5 ambulatory health IT developers with the largest market share.

Results: Developers provided interoperability measures; however, none of the developers' presented results in a meaningful way with the appropriate context to understand product interoperability.

Discussion: Our results suggest that developers with ASTP/Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) Certified Health IT modules are not providing interoperability transparency through Real World Testing as required by the ONC Health IT Certification Program and intended by the 21st Century Cures Act.

Conclusion: Clearer developer guidance and actual metric requirements on Real World Testing may be required and the authorized certification bodies, who review developer results, may need to more closely inspect reports to look at the quality of reported results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信