优势和机会:临床医生对美国肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)姑息治疗的看法。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1002/mus.28458
Kara E Bischoff, Gayle Kojimoto, David L O'Riordan, Yaowaree L Leavell, Samuel Maiser, Astrid Grouls, Alexander K Smith, Steven Z Pantilat, Benzi M Kluger, Ambereen K Mehta
{"title":"优势和机会:临床医生对美国肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)姑息治疗的看法。","authors":"Kara E Bischoff, Gayle Kojimoto, David L O'Riordan, Yaowaree L Leavell, Samuel Maiser, Astrid Grouls, Alexander K Smith, Steven Z Pantilat, Benzi M Kluger, Ambereen K Mehta","doi":"10.1002/mus.28458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Little is known about the state of palliative care (PC) for people with ALS (pALS) in the U.S. We aimed to examine current practice regarding PC for pALS and how it can be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ALS and PC clinicians completed surveys about: (1) strengths and limitations of PC for pALS provided by ALS and PC teams, (2) reasons for and barriers to referring to specialty PC, and (3) how PC could be improved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-one ALS clinicians from 72 institutions and 242 PC clinicians from 96 institutions in 30 states completed surveys. Half of ALS clinicians reported they are able to manage patients' pain (55%) and mood symptoms (52%) \"very well.\" Fewer reported managing care partner needs (43%) and spiritual/existential distress (29%) \"very well.\" Fifty-eight percent of pALS are referred to outpatient PC and 69% to hospice at some point in the illness. Barriers to referring include that PC programs are not sufficiently available to pALS. ALS clinicians generally felt satisfied with PC teams' care, but PC clinicians were less confident managing motor symptoms (51% confident) and helping care partners understand how to provide care (51%) and use equipment (25%). Most clinicians felt the quality of PC provided by ALS (77%) and PC (90%) teams is good/excellent. However, qualitative comments highlighted that both ALS and PC clinicians have knowledge gaps, and collaboration between ALS and PC clinicians should increase.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinician education, expansion of PC services, strengthened collaboration, and further research about PC for pALS are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"455-463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengths and Opportunities: Clinicians' Perspectives on Palliative Care for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Kara E Bischoff, Gayle Kojimoto, David L O'Riordan, Yaowaree L Leavell, Samuel Maiser, Astrid Grouls, Alexander K Smith, Steven Z Pantilat, Benzi M Kluger, Ambereen K Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mus.28458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Little is known about the state of palliative care (PC) for people with ALS (pALS) in the U.S. We aimed to examine current practice regarding PC for pALS and how it can be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ALS and PC clinicians completed surveys about: (1) strengths and limitations of PC for pALS provided by ALS and PC teams, (2) reasons for and barriers to referring to specialty PC, and (3) how PC could be improved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-one ALS clinicians from 72 institutions and 242 PC clinicians from 96 institutions in 30 states completed surveys. Half of ALS clinicians reported they are able to manage patients' pain (55%) and mood symptoms (52%) \\\"very well.\\\" Fewer reported managing care partner needs (43%) and spiritual/existential distress (29%) \\\"very well.\\\" Fifty-eight percent of pALS are referred to outpatient PC and 69% to hospice at some point in the illness. Barriers to referring include that PC programs are not sufficiently available to pALS. ALS clinicians generally felt satisfied with PC teams' care, but PC clinicians were less confident managing motor symptoms (51% confident) and helping care partners understand how to provide care (51%) and use equipment (25%). Most clinicians felt the quality of PC provided by ALS (77%) and PC (90%) teams is good/excellent. However, qualitative comments highlighted that both ALS and PC clinicians have knowledge gaps, and collaboration between ALS and PC clinicians should increase.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinician education, expansion of PC services, strengthened collaboration, and further research about PC for pALS are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"455-463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:在美国,人们对ALS患者的姑息治疗(PC)的状况知之甚少。我们的目的是研究目前关于pal患者姑息治疗的实践以及如何改进姑息治疗。方法:ALS和PC临床医生完成以下调查:(1)ALS和PC团队为pal提供的PC的优势和局限性,(2)参考专业PC的原因和障碍,(3)如何改进PC。结果:来自美国30个州72家机构的141名ALS临床医生和来自96家机构的242名PC临床医生完成了调查。一半的ALS临床医生报告说,他们能够控制患者的疼痛(55%)和情绪症状(52%)。“很好。”较少报告管理护理伙伴需求(43%)和精神/存在性困扰(29%)“很好。”58%的pal在疾病的某个阶段被转介到门诊PC, 69%被转介到临终关怀。转诊的障碍包括PC程序对pal的可用性不够。ALS临床医生普遍对PC团队的护理感到满意,但PC临床医生对管理运动症状(51%的信心)和帮助护理伙伴了解如何提供护理(51%)和使用设备(25%)的信心较低。大多数临床医生认为ALS(77%)和PC团队(90%)提供的PC质量是好的/优秀的。然而,定性评论强调,ALS和PC临床医生都有知识差距,ALS和PC临床医生之间的合作应该加强。讨论:临床医师教育,扩大PC服务,加强合作,进一步研究PC治疗pALS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strengths and Opportunities: Clinicians' Perspectives on Palliative Care for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in the United States.

Introduction/aims: Little is known about the state of palliative care (PC) for people with ALS (pALS) in the U.S. We aimed to examine current practice regarding PC for pALS and how it can be improved.

Methods: ALS and PC clinicians completed surveys about: (1) strengths and limitations of PC for pALS provided by ALS and PC teams, (2) reasons for and barriers to referring to specialty PC, and (3) how PC could be improved.

Results: One hundred forty-one ALS clinicians from 72 institutions and 242 PC clinicians from 96 institutions in 30 states completed surveys. Half of ALS clinicians reported they are able to manage patients' pain (55%) and mood symptoms (52%) "very well." Fewer reported managing care partner needs (43%) and spiritual/existential distress (29%) "very well." Fifty-eight percent of pALS are referred to outpatient PC and 69% to hospice at some point in the illness. Barriers to referring include that PC programs are not sufficiently available to pALS. ALS clinicians generally felt satisfied with PC teams' care, but PC clinicians were less confident managing motor symptoms (51% confident) and helping care partners understand how to provide care (51%) and use equipment (25%). Most clinicians felt the quality of PC provided by ALS (77%) and PC (90%) teams is good/excellent. However, qualitative comments highlighted that both ALS and PC clinicians have knowledge gaps, and collaboration between ALS and PC clinicians should increase.

Discussion: Clinician education, expansion of PC services, strengthened collaboration, and further research about PC for pALS are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信