Munashe Chigerwe, Karen A Boudreaux, Jacqueline M Cardwell
{"title":"混合模式学习:在临床轮转中采用认知、社会和教学存在元素。","authors":"Munashe Chigerwe, Karen A Boudreaux, Jacqueline M Cardwell","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2025-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mixed-mode (hybrid and blended) learning on the inquiry process for veterinary students on clinical rotations. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (questionnaire) data gathering was used. Deductive qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate ideas confirming the community-of-inquiry process as indicated by teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Inductive analysis was performed to evaluate ideas that did not fall under the community-of-inquiry presence. Likert scores and the proportions of different responses from the questionnaire were summarized. Seven students participated in the focus groups, whereas 60 completed the questionnaire. Thirty-one and 49 faculty members participated in the focus groups and completed the questionnaire, respectively. The components of community inquiry were present in the mixed-mode learning approach for students on clinical rotations. Emergent ideas that did not fit under cognitive, teaching, and social presences but directly or indirectly affected the inquiry process in mixed-mode learning included co-participation by students, flexibility for faculty, faculty well-being, and technical, administrative, and peer faculty support. Barriers to effective mixed-mode design of learning activities include a lack of training of clinical faculty, design misalignment between learning activities and rotation learning outcomes, and assessment of students. Implementing a well-designed institutional continuous education training program for clinical faculty on approaches to mixed-mode learning activities in clinical rotations, followed by an assessment of the training program's access, adoption, and quality, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20250018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-Mode Learning: Adoption of Cognitive, Social, and Teaching Presence Elements on Clinical Rotations.\",\"authors\":\"Munashe Chigerwe, Karen A Boudreaux, Jacqueline M Cardwell\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2025-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mixed-mode (hybrid and blended) learning on the inquiry process for veterinary students on clinical rotations. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (questionnaire) data gathering was used. Deductive qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate ideas confirming the community-of-inquiry process as indicated by teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Inductive analysis was performed to evaluate ideas that did not fall under the community-of-inquiry presence. Likert scores and the proportions of different responses from the questionnaire were summarized. Seven students participated in the focus groups, whereas 60 completed the questionnaire. Thirty-one and 49 faculty members participated in the focus groups and completed the questionnaire, respectively. The components of community inquiry were present in the mixed-mode learning approach for students on clinical rotations. Emergent ideas that did not fit under cognitive, teaching, and social presences but directly or indirectly affected the inquiry process in mixed-mode learning included co-participation by students, flexibility for faculty, faculty well-being, and technical, administrative, and peer faculty support. Barriers to effective mixed-mode design of learning activities include a lack of training of clinical faculty, design misalignment between learning activities and rotation learning outcomes, and assessment of students. Implementing a well-designed institutional continuous education training program for clinical faculty on approaches to mixed-mode learning activities in clinical rotations, followed by an assessment of the training program's access, adoption, and quality, is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20250018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2025-0018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2025-0018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mixed-Mode Learning: Adoption of Cognitive, Social, and Teaching Presence Elements on Clinical Rotations.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mixed-mode (hybrid and blended) learning on the inquiry process for veterinary students on clinical rotations. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (questionnaire) data gathering was used. Deductive qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate ideas confirming the community-of-inquiry process as indicated by teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Inductive analysis was performed to evaluate ideas that did not fall under the community-of-inquiry presence. Likert scores and the proportions of different responses from the questionnaire were summarized. Seven students participated in the focus groups, whereas 60 completed the questionnaire. Thirty-one and 49 faculty members participated in the focus groups and completed the questionnaire, respectively. The components of community inquiry were present in the mixed-mode learning approach for students on clinical rotations. Emergent ideas that did not fit under cognitive, teaching, and social presences but directly or indirectly affected the inquiry process in mixed-mode learning included co-participation by students, flexibility for faculty, faculty well-being, and technical, administrative, and peer faculty support. Barriers to effective mixed-mode design of learning activities include a lack of training of clinical faculty, design misalignment between learning activities and rotation learning outcomes, and assessment of students. Implementing a well-designed institutional continuous education training program for clinical faculty on approaches to mixed-mode learning activities in clinical rotations, followed by an assessment of the training program's access, adoption, and quality, is required.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society.
The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.