混合模式学习:在临床轮转中采用认知、社会和教学存在元素。

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Munashe Chigerwe, Karen A Boudreaux, Jacqueline M Cardwell
{"title":"混合模式学习:在临床轮转中采用认知、社会和教学存在元素。","authors":"Munashe Chigerwe, Karen A Boudreaux, Jacqueline M Cardwell","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2025-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mixed-mode (hybrid and blended) learning on the inquiry process for veterinary students on clinical rotations. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (questionnaire) data gathering was used. Deductive qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate ideas confirming the community-of-inquiry process as indicated by teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Inductive analysis was performed to evaluate ideas that did not fall under the community-of-inquiry presence. Likert scores and the proportions of different responses from the questionnaire were summarized. Seven students participated in the focus groups, whereas 60 completed the questionnaire. Thirty-one and 49 faculty members participated in the focus groups and completed the questionnaire, respectively. The components of community inquiry were present in the mixed-mode learning approach for students on clinical rotations. Emergent ideas that did not fit under cognitive, teaching, and social presences but directly or indirectly affected the inquiry process in mixed-mode learning included co-participation by students, flexibility for faculty, faculty well-being, and technical, administrative, and peer faculty support. Barriers to effective mixed-mode design of learning activities include a lack of training of clinical faculty, design misalignment between learning activities and rotation learning outcomes, and assessment of students. Implementing a well-designed institutional continuous education training program for clinical faculty on approaches to mixed-mode learning activities in clinical rotations, followed by an assessment of the training program's access, adoption, and quality, is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20250018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-Mode Learning: Adoption of Cognitive, Social, and Teaching Presence Elements on Clinical Rotations.\",\"authors\":\"Munashe Chigerwe, Karen A Boudreaux, Jacqueline M Cardwell\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2025-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mixed-mode (hybrid and blended) learning on the inquiry process for veterinary students on clinical rotations. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (questionnaire) data gathering was used. Deductive qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate ideas confirming the community-of-inquiry process as indicated by teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Inductive analysis was performed to evaluate ideas that did not fall under the community-of-inquiry presence. Likert scores and the proportions of different responses from the questionnaire were summarized. Seven students participated in the focus groups, whereas 60 completed the questionnaire. Thirty-one and 49 faculty members participated in the focus groups and completed the questionnaire, respectively. The components of community inquiry were present in the mixed-mode learning approach for students on clinical rotations. Emergent ideas that did not fit under cognitive, teaching, and social presences but directly or indirectly affected the inquiry process in mixed-mode learning included co-participation by students, flexibility for faculty, faculty well-being, and technical, administrative, and peer faculty support. Barriers to effective mixed-mode design of learning activities include a lack of training of clinical faculty, design misalignment between learning activities and rotation learning outcomes, and assessment of students. Implementing a well-designed institutional continuous education training program for clinical faculty on approaches to mixed-mode learning activities in clinical rotations, followed by an assessment of the training program's access, adoption, and quality, is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20250018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2025-0018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2025-0018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估混合模式(混合和混合)学习对兽医学生临床轮转探究过程的影响。采用定性(焦点小组)和定量(问卷)相结合的探索性顺序混合方法设计。进行演绎定性分析以评估确认探究社区过程的想法,如教学、社会和认知存在所表明的那样。进行归纳分析以评估不属于调查社区存在的想法。总结李克特得分和问卷中不同回答的比例。7名学生参加了焦点小组,而60名学生完成了问卷调查。31名教师和49名教师分别参加了焦点小组并完成了问卷调查。社区调查的组成部分存在于临床轮转学生的混合模式学习方法中。不适合认知、教学和社会存在但直接或间接影响混合模式学习探究过程的新兴想法包括学生的共同参与、教师的灵活性、教师的福利以及技术、行政和同伴教师的支持。有效的混合模式学习活动设计的障碍包括缺乏对临床教师的培训,学习活动和轮换学习结果之间的设计偏差,以及对学生的评估。实施一个精心设计的机构继续教育培训计划,为临床教师提供临床轮转中混合模式学习活动的方法,随后对培训计划的获取、采用和质量进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed-Mode Learning: Adoption of Cognitive, Social, and Teaching Presence Elements on Clinical Rotations.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mixed-mode (hybrid and blended) learning on the inquiry process for veterinary students on clinical rotations. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design combining qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (questionnaire) data gathering was used. Deductive qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate ideas confirming the community-of-inquiry process as indicated by teaching, social, and cognitive presence. Inductive analysis was performed to evaluate ideas that did not fall under the community-of-inquiry presence. Likert scores and the proportions of different responses from the questionnaire were summarized. Seven students participated in the focus groups, whereas 60 completed the questionnaire. Thirty-one and 49 faculty members participated in the focus groups and completed the questionnaire, respectively. The components of community inquiry were present in the mixed-mode learning approach for students on clinical rotations. Emergent ideas that did not fit under cognitive, teaching, and social presences but directly or indirectly affected the inquiry process in mixed-mode learning included co-participation by students, flexibility for faculty, faculty well-being, and technical, administrative, and peer faculty support. Barriers to effective mixed-mode design of learning activities include a lack of training of clinical faculty, design misalignment between learning activities and rotation learning outcomes, and assessment of students. Implementing a well-designed institutional continuous education training program for clinical faculty on approaches to mixed-mode learning activities in clinical rotations, followed by an assessment of the training program's access, adoption, and quality, is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信