Ömer Faruk Karakoyun, Fulden Cantaş Türkiş, Yalcin Golcuk, Mehmet Reha Yılmaz, Burcu Kaymak Golcuk
{"title":"Mugla评分的发展:一种基于关联的工具,用于急诊科横纹肌溶解患者的风险分层。","authors":"Ömer Faruk Karakoyun, Fulden Cantaş Türkiş, Yalcin Golcuk, Mehmet Reha Yılmaz, Burcu Kaymak Golcuk","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04009-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rhabdomyolysis is a potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by skeletal muscle breakdown and systemic release of intracellular components, often resulting in acute kidney injury or death. Early risk stratification remains challenging in the emergency department (ED) setting due to heterogeneous presentations and unpredictable outcomes. To develop and internally validate the Mugla Score-a pragmatic, association-based tool for predicting adverse outcomes in ED patients with rhabdomyolysis. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, adult ED patients with serum creatine kinase ≥ 1000 U/L between July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2024, were included. The primary outcome was a composite of renal replacement therapy or 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors, which were assigned weighted point values. Internal validity was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Among 1031 patients (mean age: 49.0 ± 21.8 years; 75.9% male), 109 (10.6%) experienced the composite outcome. Seven variables were independently associated with adverse events: age ≥ 50 years, platelet count ≤ 170 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL, MCHC ≤ 32.8 g/dL, calcium ≤ 8.5 mg/dL, ALP ≥ 115 U/L, BEecf ≤ - 6 mmol/L, and etiological classification. The Mugla Score (range: 0-12.5) showed strong discrimination (AUC: 0.861, 95% CI: 0.824-0.898). A threshold of ≥ 4 points yielded a 97% negative predictive value. The Mugla Score provides a clinically interpretable, ED-focused tool for early risk stratification in rhabdomyolysis. While internally validated, external prospective studies are needed to assess generalizability prior to routine clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Mugla Score: an association-based tool for risk stratification in emergency department patients with rhabdomyolysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Faruk Karakoyun, Fulden Cantaş Türkiş, Yalcin Golcuk, Mehmet Reha Yılmaz, Burcu Kaymak Golcuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04009-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rhabdomyolysis is a potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by skeletal muscle breakdown and systemic release of intracellular components, often resulting in acute kidney injury or death. Early risk stratification remains challenging in the emergency department (ED) setting due to heterogeneous presentations and unpredictable outcomes. To develop and internally validate the Mugla Score-a pragmatic, association-based tool for predicting adverse outcomes in ED patients with rhabdomyolysis. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, adult ED patients with serum creatine kinase ≥ 1000 U/L between July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2024, were included. The primary outcome was a composite of renal replacement therapy or 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors, which were assigned weighted point values. Internal validity was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Among 1031 patients (mean age: 49.0 ± 21.8 years; 75.9% male), 109 (10.6%) experienced the composite outcome. Seven variables were independently associated with adverse events: age ≥ 50 years, platelet count ≤ 170 × 10<sup>3</sup>/μL, MCHC ≤ 32.8 g/dL, calcium ≤ 8.5 mg/dL, ALP ≥ 115 U/L, BEecf ≤ - 6 mmol/L, and etiological classification. The Mugla Score (range: 0-12.5) showed strong discrimination (AUC: 0.861, 95% CI: 0.824-0.898). A threshold of ≥ 4 points yielded a 97% negative predictive value. The Mugla Score provides a clinically interpretable, ED-focused tool for early risk stratification in rhabdomyolysis. While internally validated, external prospective studies are needed to assess generalizability prior to routine clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04009-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04009-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of the Mugla Score: an association-based tool for risk stratification in emergency department patients with rhabdomyolysis.
Rhabdomyolysis is a potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by skeletal muscle breakdown and systemic release of intracellular components, often resulting in acute kidney injury or death. Early risk stratification remains challenging in the emergency department (ED) setting due to heterogeneous presentations and unpredictable outcomes. To develop and internally validate the Mugla Score-a pragmatic, association-based tool for predicting adverse outcomes in ED patients with rhabdomyolysis. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, adult ED patients with serum creatine kinase ≥ 1000 U/L between July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2024, were included. The primary outcome was a composite of renal replacement therapy or 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors, which were assigned weighted point values. Internal validity was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Among 1031 patients (mean age: 49.0 ± 21.8 years; 75.9% male), 109 (10.6%) experienced the composite outcome. Seven variables were independently associated with adverse events: age ≥ 50 years, platelet count ≤ 170 × 103/μL, MCHC ≤ 32.8 g/dL, calcium ≤ 8.5 mg/dL, ALP ≥ 115 U/L, BEecf ≤ - 6 mmol/L, and etiological classification. The Mugla Score (range: 0-12.5) showed strong discrimination (AUC: 0.861, 95% CI: 0.824-0.898). A threshold of ≥ 4 points yielded a 97% negative predictive value. The Mugla Score provides a clinically interpretable, ED-focused tool for early risk stratification in rhabdomyolysis. While internally validated, external prospective studies are needed to assess generalizability prior to routine clinical adoption.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.