维生素C脂质体制剂提高了生物利用度吗?确定未来研究方向的范围综述

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anitra C. Carr
{"title":"维生素C脂质体制剂提高了生物利用度吗?确定未来研究方向的范围综述","authors":"Anitra C. Carr","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C (ascorbate) by humans, formulation of the vitamin to increase its bioavailability is of relevance, particularly for those with higher requirements for the vitamin. In this scoping review, studies assessing the bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate were identified through database and manual searching and relevant pharmacokinetic data were extracted. Of the 321 studies identified, 10 were included in the final review. Seven of the trials used randomised crossover designs, one used parallel groups and two were non-randomised. Vastly different liposomal formulations, ascorbate doses (0.15–10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h) were used, thereby making it difficult to directly compare the studies. Nevertheless, nine of the studies showed higher bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate: 1.2–5.4-fold higher Cmax and 1.3–7.2-fold higher AUC. However, none of the studies assessed ascorbate elimination; therefore, it is uncertain whether the ratios of liposomal to non-liposomal ascorbate in urine are equivalent to those observed in plasma. Furthermore, only two of the studies assessed in vivo cellular uptake and only two assessed potential biological effects. Thus, future studies should include urinary elimination and cellular uptake kinetics, assess participants with low baseline status and investigate potential biological effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C by humans, formulations to increase its uptake into the body are of relevance, particularly in those with higher requirements for the vitamin.</li>\n \n \n <li>In this review, studies assessing the uptake of liposomal versus non-liposomal vitamin C were investigated; liposomal vitamin C comprising the vitamin encapsulated within lipids.</li>\n \n \n <li>Ten studies were identified, which administered different liposomal formulations, vitamin C doses (0.15-10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h).</li>\n \n \n <li>Nine of the studies showed higher uptake of liposomal vitamin C. Future studies should assess urinary excretion, cellular uptake and biological effects of liposomal vitamin C.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Liposomal Vitamin C Formulations Have Improved Bioavailability? A Scoping Review Identifying Future Research Directions\",\"authors\":\"Anitra C. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcpt.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C (ascorbate) by humans, formulation of the vitamin to increase its bioavailability is of relevance, particularly for those with higher requirements for the vitamin. In this scoping review, studies assessing the bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate were identified through database and manual searching and relevant pharmacokinetic data were extracted. Of the 321 studies identified, 10 were included in the final review. Seven of the trials used randomised crossover designs, one used parallel groups and two were non-randomised. Vastly different liposomal formulations, ascorbate doses (0.15–10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h) were used, thereby making it difficult to directly compare the studies. Nevertheless, nine of the studies showed higher bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate: 1.2–5.4-fold higher Cmax and 1.3–7.2-fold higher AUC. However, none of the studies assessed ascorbate elimination; therefore, it is uncertain whether the ratios of liposomal to non-liposomal ascorbate in urine are equivalent to those observed in plasma. Furthermore, only two of the studies assessed in vivo cellular uptake and only two assessed potential biological effects. Thus, future studies should include urinary elimination and cellular uptake kinetics, assess participants with low baseline status and investigate potential biological effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Summary</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n \\n <li>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C by humans, formulations to increase its uptake into the body are of relevance, particularly in those with higher requirements for the vitamin.</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>In this review, studies assessing the uptake of liposomal versus non-liposomal vitamin C were investigated; liposomal vitamin C comprising the vitamin encapsulated within lipids.</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>Ten studies were identified, which administered different liposomal formulations, vitamin C doses (0.15-10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h).</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>Nine of the studies showed higher uptake of liposomal vitamin C. Future studies should assess urinary excretion, cellular uptake and biological effects of liposomal vitamin C.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70067\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于人类对维生素C(抗坏血酸)的基本需求,维生素的配方以提高其生物利用度是相关的,特别是对维生素需求较高的人。在这篇范围综述中,通过数据库和人工检索确定了评估脂质体与非脂质体抗坏血酸生物利用度的研究,并提取了相关的药代动力学数据。在确定的321项研究中,有10项纳入了最终综述。其中7项试验采用随机交叉设计,1项采用平行组,2项采用非随机组。使用了截然不同的脂质体配方、抗坏血酸剂量(0.15-10 g)和样品采集时间(4-24小时),因此难以直接比较研究。然而,有9项研究显示,脂质体抗坏血酸的生物利用度比非脂质体高:Cmax高1.2 - 5.4倍,AUC高1.3 - 7.2倍。然而,没有一项研究评估抗坏血酸的消除;因此,尿中脂质体与非脂质体抗坏血酸的比值是否与血浆中观察到的相等是不确定的。此外,只有两项研究评估了体内细胞摄取,只有两项研究评估了潜在的生物效应。因此,未来的研究应包括尿液消除和细胞摄取动力学,评估低基线状态的参与者并调查潜在的生物学效应。由于人体对维生素C的基本需求,增加其被人体吸收的配方是相关的,特别是那些对维生素需求较高的人。在这篇综述中,研究评估脂质体与非脂质体维生素C的摄取;脂质体维生素C,包括被包裹在脂质的维生素。确定了10项研究,其中使用了不同的脂质体配方,维生素C剂量(0.15-10 g)和样品采集时间(4-24小时)。其中9项研究显示维生素C脂质体的摄取较高。未来的研究应评估维生素C脂质体的尿排泄、细胞摄取和生物学效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Liposomal Vitamin C Formulations Have Improved Bioavailability? A Scoping Review Identifying Future Research Directions

Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C (ascorbate) by humans, formulation of the vitamin to increase its bioavailability is of relevance, particularly for those with higher requirements for the vitamin. In this scoping review, studies assessing the bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate were identified through database and manual searching and relevant pharmacokinetic data were extracted. Of the 321 studies identified, 10 were included in the final review. Seven of the trials used randomised crossover designs, one used parallel groups and two were non-randomised. Vastly different liposomal formulations, ascorbate doses (0.15–10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h) were used, thereby making it difficult to directly compare the studies. Nevertheless, nine of the studies showed higher bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate: 1.2–5.4-fold higher Cmax and 1.3–7.2-fold higher AUC. However, none of the studies assessed ascorbate elimination; therefore, it is uncertain whether the ratios of liposomal to non-liposomal ascorbate in urine are equivalent to those observed in plasma. Furthermore, only two of the studies assessed in vivo cellular uptake and only two assessed potential biological effects. Thus, future studies should include urinary elimination and cellular uptake kinetics, assess participants with low baseline status and investigate potential biological effects.

Summary

  • Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C by humans, formulations to increase its uptake into the body are of relevance, particularly in those with higher requirements for the vitamin.
  • In this review, studies assessing the uptake of liposomal versus non-liposomal vitamin C were investigated; liposomal vitamin C comprising the vitamin encapsulated within lipids.
  • Ten studies were identified, which administered different liposomal formulations, vitamin C doses (0.15-10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h).
  • Nine of the studies showed higher uptake of liposomal vitamin C. Future studies should assess urinary excretion, cellular uptake and biological effects of liposomal vitamin C.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信