{"title":"维生素C脂质体制剂提高了生物利用度吗?确定未来研究方向的范围综述","authors":"Anitra C. Carr","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C (ascorbate) by humans, formulation of the vitamin to increase its bioavailability is of relevance, particularly for those with higher requirements for the vitamin. In this scoping review, studies assessing the bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate were identified through database and manual searching and relevant pharmacokinetic data were extracted. Of the 321 studies identified, 10 were included in the final review. Seven of the trials used randomised crossover designs, one used parallel groups and two were non-randomised. Vastly different liposomal formulations, ascorbate doses (0.15–10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h) were used, thereby making it difficult to directly compare the studies. Nevertheless, nine of the studies showed higher bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate: 1.2–5.4-fold higher Cmax and 1.3–7.2-fold higher AUC. However, none of the studies assessed ascorbate elimination; therefore, it is uncertain whether the ratios of liposomal to non-liposomal ascorbate in urine are equivalent to those observed in plasma. Furthermore, only two of the studies assessed in vivo cellular uptake and only two assessed potential biological effects. Thus, future studies should include urinary elimination and cellular uptake kinetics, assess participants with low baseline status and investigate potential biological effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C by humans, formulations to increase its uptake into the body are of relevance, particularly in those with higher requirements for the vitamin.</li>\n \n \n <li>In this review, studies assessing the uptake of liposomal versus non-liposomal vitamin C were investigated; liposomal vitamin C comprising the vitamin encapsulated within lipids.</li>\n \n \n <li>Ten studies were identified, which administered different liposomal formulations, vitamin C doses (0.15-10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h).</li>\n \n \n <li>Nine of the studies showed higher uptake of liposomal vitamin C. Future studies should assess urinary excretion, cellular uptake and biological effects of liposomal vitamin C.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Liposomal Vitamin C Formulations Have Improved Bioavailability? A Scoping Review Identifying Future Research Directions\",\"authors\":\"Anitra C. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcpt.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C (ascorbate) by humans, formulation of the vitamin to increase its bioavailability is of relevance, particularly for those with higher requirements for the vitamin. In this scoping review, studies assessing the bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate were identified through database and manual searching and relevant pharmacokinetic data were extracted. Of the 321 studies identified, 10 were included in the final review. Seven of the trials used randomised crossover designs, one used parallel groups and two were non-randomised. Vastly different liposomal formulations, ascorbate doses (0.15–10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h) were used, thereby making it difficult to directly compare the studies. Nevertheless, nine of the studies showed higher bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate: 1.2–5.4-fold higher Cmax and 1.3–7.2-fold higher AUC. However, none of the studies assessed ascorbate elimination; therefore, it is uncertain whether the ratios of liposomal to non-liposomal ascorbate in urine are equivalent to those observed in plasma. Furthermore, only two of the studies assessed in vivo cellular uptake and only two assessed potential biological effects. Thus, future studies should include urinary elimination and cellular uptake kinetics, assess participants with low baseline status and investigate potential biological effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Summary</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <ul>\\n \\n \\n <li>Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C by humans, formulations to increase its uptake into the body are of relevance, particularly in those with higher requirements for the vitamin.</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>In this review, studies assessing the uptake of liposomal versus non-liposomal vitamin C were investigated; liposomal vitamin C comprising the vitamin encapsulated within lipids.</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>Ten studies were identified, which administered different liposomal formulations, vitamin C doses (0.15-10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h).</li>\\n \\n \\n <li>Nine of the studies showed higher uptake of liposomal vitamin C. Future studies should assess urinary excretion, cellular uptake and biological effects of liposomal vitamin C.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70067\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do Liposomal Vitamin C Formulations Have Improved Bioavailability? A Scoping Review Identifying Future Research Directions
Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C (ascorbate) by humans, formulation of the vitamin to increase its bioavailability is of relevance, particularly for those with higher requirements for the vitamin. In this scoping review, studies assessing the bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate were identified through database and manual searching and relevant pharmacokinetic data were extracted. Of the 321 studies identified, 10 were included in the final review. Seven of the trials used randomised crossover designs, one used parallel groups and two were non-randomised. Vastly different liposomal formulations, ascorbate doses (0.15–10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h) were used, thereby making it difficult to directly compare the studies. Nevertheless, nine of the studies showed higher bioavailability of liposomal versus non-liposomal ascorbate: 1.2–5.4-fold higher Cmax and 1.3–7.2-fold higher AUC. However, none of the studies assessed ascorbate elimination; therefore, it is uncertain whether the ratios of liposomal to non-liposomal ascorbate in urine are equivalent to those observed in plasma. Furthermore, only two of the studies assessed in vivo cellular uptake and only two assessed potential biological effects. Thus, future studies should include urinary elimination and cellular uptake kinetics, assess participants with low baseline status and investigate potential biological effects.
Summary
Due to the essential requirement of vitamin C by humans, formulations to increase its uptake into the body are of relevance, particularly in those with higher requirements for the vitamin.
In this review, studies assessing the uptake of liposomal versus non-liposomal vitamin C were investigated; liposomal vitamin C comprising the vitamin encapsulated within lipids.
Ten studies were identified, which administered different liposomal formulations, vitamin C doses (0.15-10 g) and sample collection durations (4–24 h).
Nine of the studies showed higher uptake of liposomal vitamin C. Future studies should assess urinary excretion, cellular uptake and biological effects of liposomal vitamin C.
期刊介绍:
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.