基于cbt的压力管理干预对因工作压力而请病假的丹麦患者的现实评估:一项研究方案

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Charlotte Brøgger Bond , Lars Peter Andreas Brandt , Daniel Navy Ditlevsen , Sonia Dalkin , Morten Vejs Willert , Lotte Nygaard Andersen
{"title":"基于cbt的压力管理干预对因工作压力而请病假的丹麦患者的现实评估:一项研究方案","authors":"Charlotte Brøgger Bond ,&nbsp;Lars Peter Andreas Brandt ,&nbsp;Daniel Navy Ditlevsen ,&nbsp;Sonia Dalkin ,&nbsp;Morten Vejs Willert ,&nbsp;Lotte Nygaard Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most widely used stress management intervention for work-related stress, however the effect on return to work is unclear. Further, there is a lack of knowledge about the mechanisms and contexts that make CBT interventions work (or not). This project aims to use a realist evaluation approach to explore the outcomes of a stress management intervention at a Danish Occupational Health Clinic and to understand if, how and why it works (mechanisms), for whom and in what circumstances (contexts). Firstly, the initial programme theory (IPT) will be elicited. Secondly, the IPT will be tested using a mix of methods. The primary outcome of the intervention; return to work, will be assessed in a quasi-experimental study using register data on sick-leave compensation. In a cohort study explanatory variables from patient surveys and national registries associated with outcomes will be explored. Finally, realist theory driven interviews with patients will explore what works, for whom in what context. The data will be analysed using a realist logic, and synthesized to refine, refute, or confirm the IPT. The refined programme theory will offer insights about what patient groups benefit from the intervention (if any), under what circumstances, and why.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realist evaluation of a CBT-based stress management intervention for Danish patients on sick leave due to work-related stress: A study protocol\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Brøgger Bond ,&nbsp;Lars Peter Andreas Brandt ,&nbsp;Daniel Navy Ditlevsen ,&nbsp;Sonia Dalkin ,&nbsp;Morten Vejs Willert ,&nbsp;Lotte Nygaard Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most widely used stress management intervention for work-related stress, however the effect on return to work is unclear. Further, there is a lack of knowledge about the mechanisms and contexts that make CBT interventions work (or not). This project aims to use a realist evaluation approach to explore the outcomes of a stress management intervention at a Danish Occupational Health Clinic and to understand if, how and why it works (mechanisms), for whom and in what circumstances (contexts). Firstly, the initial programme theory (IPT) will be elicited. Secondly, the IPT will be tested using a mix of methods. The primary outcome of the intervention; return to work, will be assessed in a quasi-experimental study using register data on sick-leave compensation. In a cohort study explanatory variables from patient surveys and national registries associated with outcomes will be explored. Finally, realist theory driven interviews with patients will explore what works, for whom in what context. The data will be analysed using a realist logic, and synthesized to refine, refute, or confirm the IPT. The refined programme theory will offer insights about what patient groups benefit from the intervention (if any), under what circumstances, and why.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)是最广泛应用于工作压力管理的干预手段,但其对恢复工作的影响尚不清楚。此外,人们对CBT干预有效(或无效)的机制和背景缺乏了解。本项目旨在采用现实评估方法,探索丹麦职业健康诊所压力管理干预的结果,并了解它是否有效、如何有效以及为什么有效(机制)、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效(背景)。首先,将引出初始程序理论(IPT)。其次,IPT将使用多种方法进行测试。干预的主要结果;返回工作岗位,将在一项准实验研究中使用病假补偿登记数据进行评估。在一项队列研究中,将探讨来自患者调查和国家登记的与结果相关的解释变量。最后,现实主义理论驱动的病人访谈将探索什么是有效的,在什么情况下对谁有效。数据将使用现实主义逻辑进行分析,并综合以完善、反驳或确认IPT。改进后的方案理论将提供关于哪些患者群体从干预中受益(如果有的话)、在什么情况下以及为什么受益的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realist evaluation of a CBT-based stress management intervention for Danish patients on sick leave due to work-related stress: A study protocol
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most widely used stress management intervention for work-related stress, however the effect on return to work is unclear. Further, there is a lack of knowledge about the mechanisms and contexts that make CBT interventions work (or not). This project aims to use a realist evaluation approach to explore the outcomes of a stress management intervention at a Danish Occupational Health Clinic and to understand if, how and why it works (mechanisms), for whom and in what circumstances (contexts). Firstly, the initial programme theory (IPT) will be elicited. Secondly, the IPT will be tested using a mix of methods. The primary outcome of the intervention; return to work, will be assessed in a quasi-experimental study using register data on sick-leave compensation. In a cohort study explanatory variables from patient surveys and national registries associated with outcomes will be explored. Finally, realist theory driven interviews with patients will explore what works, for whom in what context. The data will be analysed using a realist logic, and synthesized to refine, refute, or confirm the IPT. The refined programme theory will offer insights about what patient groups benefit from the intervention (if any), under what circumstances, and why.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信