非营利性酒精和其他药物服务机构方案评估的范围审查:对服务和研究伙伴关系的考虑

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Emily Deans , George Economidis , Peter Gates , Andrea Zocco , Robert Stirling , Sally Nathan , Suzie Hudson , Sara Farnbach
{"title":"非营利性酒精和其他药物服务机构方案评估的范围审查:对服务和研究伙伴关系的考虑","authors":"Emily Deans ,&nbsp;George Economidis ,&nbsp;Peter Gates ,&nbsp;Andrea Zocco ,&nbsp;Robert Stirling ,&nbsp;Sally Nathan ,&nbsp;Suzie Hudson ,&nbsp;Sara Farnbach","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The non-profit sector contributes significantly to preventing and reducing harm from alcohol and other drugs (AOD). However, it can experience challenges when demonstrating impact via feasible and rigorous evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review to identify characteristics of, and barriers/enablers to, evaluations completed in non-profit AOD services, and to ascertain the degree of collaboration between researchers and service providers during three evaluation phases (preparatory, conduct; and dissemination and implementation). We searched EMBASE and Medline from inception to February 2023 for evaluations completed in small to medium non-profit AOD services. Screening and extraction were completed by three reviewers independently, and 80 % were checked by an additional reviewer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ultimately, 56 records were included in this study. Included evaluations were largely initiated by researchers, with limited input from service providers in setting the agenda for the evaluations (preparatory phase) or translating findings into practice (dissemination and implementation phase). Where collaborations between researchers and service providers were in place, they generated funding and strong engagement with participants, leading to better recruitment, more complete data collection, and enhanced evaluation outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The review raises important implications for researchers and service providers to prioritise meaningful collaboration and innovation to inform appropriate selection of evaluation topics and designs. Specifically, such evaluations should generate knowledge which can be translated into practice, demonstrating the impact of services and programs and an evidence base built in the non-profit sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of program evaluations in non-profit alcohol and other drugs service settings: Considerations for service and research partnerships\",\"authors\":\"Emily Deans ,&nbsp;George Economidis ,&nbsp;Peter Gates ,&nbsp;Andrea Zocco ,&nbsp;Robert Stirling ,&nbsp;Sally Nathan ,&nbsp;Suzie Hudson ,&nbsp;Sara Farnbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The non-profit sector contributes significantly to preventing and reducing harm from alcohol and other drugs (AOD). However, it can experience challenges when demonstrating impact via feasible and rigorous evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review to identify characteristics of, and barriers/enablers to, evaluations completed in non-profit AOD services, and to ascertain the degree of collaboration between researchers and service providers during three evaluation phases (preparatory, conduct; and dissemination and implementation). We searched EMBASE and Medline from inception to February 2023 for evaluations completed in small to medium non-profit AOD services. Screening and extraction were completed by three reviewers independently, and 80 % were checked by an additional reviewer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ultimately, 56 records were included in this study. Included evaluations were largely initiated by researchers, with limited input from service providers in setting the agenda for the evaluations (preparatory phase) or translating findings into practice (dissemination and implementation phase). Where collaborations between researchers and service providers were in place, they generated funding and strong engagement with participants, leading to better recruitment, more complete data collection, and enhanced evaluation outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The review raises important implications for researchers and service providers to prioritise meaningful collaboration and innovation to inform appropriate selection of evaluation topics and designs. Specifically, such evaluations should generate knowledge which can be translated into practice, demonstrating the impact of services and programs and an evidence base built in the non-profit sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000813\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言非营利部门在预防和减少酒精和其他药物的危害方面作出了重大贡献。然而,在通过可行和严格的评估来展示影响时,它可能会遇到挑战。方法:我们进行了范围审查,以确定非营利性AOD服务完成评估的特征和障碍/推动因素,并确定研究人员和服务提供商在三个评估阶段(准备阶段、实施阶段和实施阶段)的合作程度。以及传播和实施)。我们检索了EMBASE和Medline从成立到2023年2月完成的中小型非营利AOD服务的评估。筛选和提取由三名审稿人独立完成,80% %由另一名审稿人检查。结果最终纳入56例病例。纳入的评价主要是由研究人员发起的,服务提供者在制定评价议程(筹备阶段)或将结果转化为实践(传播和实施阶段)方面的投入有限。在研究人员和服务提供者之间的合作到位的地方,它们产生了资金和与参与者的密切接触,从而导致更好的招聘、更完整的数据收集和更好的评估结果。结论该综述为研究人员和服务提供者优先考虑有意义的合作和创新提供了重要启示,从而为适当选择评估主题和设计提供了信息。具体来说,这种评估应该产生可以转化为实践的知识,展示服务和项目的影响,以及在非营利部门建立的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review of program evaluations in non-profit alcohol and other drugs service settings: Considerations for service and research partnerships

Introduction

The non-profit sector contributes significantly to preventing and reducing harm from alcohol and other drugs (AOD). However, it can experience challenges when demonstrating impact via feasible and rigorous evaluation.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review to identify characteristics of, and barriers/enablers to, evaluations completed in non-profit AOD services, and to ascertain the degree of collaboration between researchers and service providers during three evaluation phases (preparatory, conduct; and dissemination and implementation). We searched EMBASE and Medline from inception to February 2023 for evaluations completed in small to medium non-profit AOD services. Screening and extraction were completed by three reviewers independently, and 80 % were checked by an additional reviewer.

Results

Ultimately, 56 records were included in this study. Included evaluations were largely initiated by researchers, with limited input from service providers in setting the agenda for the evaluations (preparatory phase) or translating findings into practice (dissemination and implementation phase). Where collaborations between researchers and service providers were in place, they generated funding and strong engagement with participants, leading to better recruitment, more complete data collection, and enhanced evaluation outcomes.

Conclusion

The review raises important implications for researchers and service providers to prioritise meaningful collaboration and innovation to inform appropriate selection of evaluation topics and designs. Specifically, such evaluations should generate knowledge which can be translated into practice, demonstrating the impact of services and programs and an evidence base built in the non-profit sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信