{"title":"二元模式对合作写作中认知冲突事件分布和解决的影响","authors":"Ningning Li, Ying Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how dyadic patterns influence the distribution (frequency and type) and resolution of cognitive conflict episodes (CCEs) in collaborative writing among Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners. Sixty-two (31 pairs) EFL learners were invited to co-construct an argumentative essay within 45 min and complete a reflective journal individually after class. In addition, semi-structured interviews with nine pairs were conducted to elicit their perceptions of cognitive conflicts. All pair talks during writing were audio-recorded and analyzed for dyadic patterns and CCEs. As a result, three dyadic patterns were identified, including high mutuality, moderate mutuality, and low mutuality. Regardless of the dyadic patterns, all pairs devoted the greatest attention to language-related CCEs, followed by content-related and organization-related CCEs. Additionally, the findings indicate that pairs with a high-mutuality pattern significantly produced and correctly resolved more CCEs than those with a low-mutuality pattern. Findings of this study reveal the importance of dyadic patterns in enhancing students’ ability to deal with the cognitive conflicts in peer interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103747"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dyadic patterns on the distribution and resolution of cognitive conflict episodes in collaborative writing\",\"authors\":\"Ningning Li, Ying Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2025.103747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates how dyadic patterns influence the distribution (frequency and type) and resolution of cognitive conflict episodes (CCEs) in collaborative writing among Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners. Sixty-two (31 pairs) EFL learners were invited to co-construct an argumentative essay within 45 min and complete a reflective journal individually after class. In addition, semi-structured interviews with nine pairs were conducted to elicit their perceptions of cognitive conflicts. All pair talks during writing were audio-recorded and analyzed for dyadic patterns and CCEs. As a result, three dyadic patterns were identified, including high mutuality, moderate mutuality, and low mutuality. Regardless of the dyadic patterns, all pairs devoted the greatest attention to language-related CCEs, followed by content-related and organization-related CCEs. Additionally, the findings indicate that pairs with a high-mutuality pattern significantly produced and correctly resolved more CCEs than those with a low-mutuality pattern. Findings of this study reveal the importance of dyadic patterns in enhancing students’ ability to deal with the cognitive conflicts in peer interaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001575\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001575","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of dyadic patterns on the distribution and resolution of cognitive conflict episodes in collaborative writing
This study investigates how dyadic patterns influence the distribution (frequency and type) and resolution of cognitive conflict episodes (CCEs) in collaborative writing among Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners. Sixty-two (31 pairs) EFL learners were invited to co-construct an argumentative essay within 45 min and complete a reflective journal individually after class. In addition, semi-structured interviews with nine pairs were conducted to elicit their perceptions of cognitive conflicts. All pair talks during writing were audio-recorded and analyzed for dyadic patterns and CCEs. As a result, three dyadic patterns were identified, including high mutuality, moderate mutuality, and low mutuality. Regardless of the dyadic patterns, all pairs devoted the greatest attention to language-related CCEs, followed by content-related and organization-related CCEs. Additionally, the findings indicate that pairs with a high-mutuality pattern significantly produced and correctly resolved more CCEs than those with a low-mutuality pattern. Findings of this study reveal the importance of dyadic patterns in enhancing students’ ability to deal with the cognitive conflicts in peer interaction.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.