泵与注射器:吸入性取栓直接压力的比较在一个全面的台式三维打印圈威利斯模型。

Holly Berns, Kimberly Han, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Kailey L Lewis, Sophia E Robertson, Wyatt E Clark, Jesse C Wells, Mohammed K Alnajrani, Christopher Rapoport, Steven Schwartz, Kana'i Hakes, Justin H Granstein, Christopher S Ogilvy, Timothy A Becker, Michael Young
{"title":"泵与注射器:吸入性取栓直接压力的比较在一个全面的台式三维打印圈威利斯模型。","authors":"Holly Berns, Kimberly Han, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Kailey L Lewis, Sophia E Robertson, Wyatt E Clark, Jesse C Wells, Mohammed K Alnajrani, Christopher Rapoport, Steven Schwartz, Kana'i Hakes, Justin H Granstein, Christopher S Ogilvy, Timothy A Becker, Michael Young","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Experiments have shown that 60-cc syringes generate stronger vacuum forces than mechanical pumps. However, few studies have measured catheter tip suction pressure during thrombus engagement. Therefore, this study aimed to compare aspiration forces and pressure drops, generated by mechanical pumps and 60-cc syringes connected to various catheters when aspirating synthetic clots in a 3-dimensional-printed model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The system includes a programmable pulsatile pump, a 3-dimensional-printed tissue-matched circle of Willis model, radiopaque synthetic blood clots positioned in the left internal carotid artery terminus, and pressure recording at 500 ± 10% mL/min and 120/80 ± 10 mm Hg. Each catheter underwent 3 soft and hard clot removal trials using a 60-cc syringe and an aspiration pump. Aspiration source pressure was recorded before, during, and after aspiration. The evaluated variables included engagement pressure change (∆Pengagement), aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration), and pressure efficiency (PE), defined as the percentage of peak pressure maintained during aspiration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspirating soft clots with syringes showed low engagement pressure drops (∆Pengagement) (0-14 mm Hg), high PE at 93%-99% of Pp, and minimal aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration) (6F catheters: 4-8 mm Hg, 8F catheters: 19 mm Hg). Conversely, using a pump generated moderate ∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51 mm Hg, 8F: 122 mm Hg), lower PE (69%-93% of Pp), and greater ∆Paspiration (6F: 143-151 mm Hg, 8F: 270 mm Hg). For hard clots, syringes exhibited minimal ∆Pengagement and ∆Paspiration (4-13 mm Hg and 3-12 mm Hg, respectively), whereas pumps showed moderate ∆Pengagement (2-34 mm Hg) and large ∆Paspiration (6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Syringe aspiration generates higher vacuum pressures and smaller pressure drops than aspiration pumps, likely because of vacuum tubing resistance in aspiration pumps. This effect is particularly evident with hard clots and larger inner diameter catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pump Versus Syringe: Aspiration Thrombectomy Direct Pressure Comparisons in a Comprehensive Benchtop 3-Dimensional-Printed Circle of Willis Model.\",\"authors\":\"Holly Berns, Kimberly Han, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Kailey L Lewis, Sophia E Robertson, Wyatt E Clark, Jesse C Wells, Mohammed K Alnajrani, Christopher Rapoport, Steven Schwartz, Kana'i Hakes, Justin H Granstein, Christopher S Ogilvy, Timothy A Becker, Michael Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Experiments have shown that 60-cc syringes generate stronger vacuum forces than mechanical pumps. However, few studies have measured catheter tip suction pressure during thrombus engagement. Therefore, this study aimed to compare aspiration forces and pressure drops, generated by mechanical pumps and 60-cc syringes connected to various catheters when aspirating synthetic clots in a 3-dimensional-printed model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The system includes a programmable pulsatile pump, a 3-dimensional-printed tissue-matched circle of Willis model, radiopaque synthetic blood clots positioned in the left internal carotid artery terminus, and pressure recording at 500 ± 10% mL/min and 120/80 ± 10 mm Hg. Each catheter underwent 3 soft and hard clot removal trials using a 60-cc syringe and an aspiration pump. Aspiration source pressure was recorded before, during, and after aspiration. The evaluated variables included engagement pressure change (∆Pengagement), aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration), and pressure efficiency (PE), defined as the percentage of peak pressure maintained during aspiration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspirating soft clots with syringes showed low engagement pressure drops (∆Pengagement) (0-14 mm Hg), high PE at 93%-99% of Pp, and minimal aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration) (6F catheters: 4-8 mm Hg, 8F catheters: 19 mm Hg). Conversely, using a pump generated moderate ∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51 mm Hg, 8F: 122 mm Hg), lower PE (69%-93% of Pp), and greater ∆Paspiration (6F: 143-151 mm Hg, 8F: 270 mm Hg). For hard clots, syringes exhibited minimal ∆Pengagement and ∆Paspiration (4-13 mm Hg and 3-12 mm Hg, respectively), whereas pumps showed moderate ∆Pengagement (2-34 mm Hg) and large ∆Paspiration (6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Syringe aspiration generates higher vacuum pressures and smaller pressure drops than aspiration pumps, likely because of vacuum tubing resistance in aspiration pumps. This effect is particularly evident with hard clots and larger inner diameter catheters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:实验表明,60cc注射器产生比机械泵更强的真空力。然而,很少有研究测量血栓接合时导管尖端的吸入压力。因此,本研究旨在比较在三维打印模型中吸入合成血块时,机械泵和连接不同导管的60cc注射器产生的吸入力和压降。方法:该系统包括一个可编程的脉冲泵,一个三维打印的组织匹配的威利斯圆模型,在左颈内动脉末端放置不透放线的合成血凝块,记录500±10% mL/min和120/80±10 mm Hg的压力。每根导管分别使用60cc注射器和抽吸泵进行3次软硬血凝块清除试验。在抽吸前、抽吸中、抽吸后分别记录抽吸源压力。评估的变量包括吸入压力变化(∆Pengagement)、吸入压力下降(∆p抱负)和压力效率(PE), PE定义为吸入过程中保持峰值压力的百分比。结果:用注射器吸入软凝块,接触压降(∆Pengagement)低(0 ~ 14 mm Hg), PE高(93% ~ 99% Pp),吸出压降(∆p吸)最小(6F导管:4 ~ 8 mm Hg, 8F导管:19 mm Hg)。相反,使用泵产生适度的∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51毫米汞柱,8F: 122毫米汞柱),较低的PE (Pp的69%-93%)和较大的∆Pengagement (6F: 143-151毫米汞柱,8F: 270毫米汞柱)。对于硬血块,注射器表现出最小的∆p接合和∆p接合(分别为4-13 mm Hg和3-12 mm Hg),而泵表现出中等的∆p接合(2-34 mm Hg)和大的∆p接合(6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg)。结论:与抽吸泵相比,注射器抽吸产生的真空压力更高,压降更小,可能是由于抽吸泵中的真空管阻力所致。这种效果在硬血块和内径较大的导管中尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pump Versus Syringe: Aspiration Thrombectomy Direct Pressure Comparisons in a Comprehensive Benchtop 3-Dimensional-Printed Circle of Willis Model.

Background and objectives: Experiments have shown that 60-cc syringes generate stronger vacuum forces than mechanical pumps. However, few studies have measured catheter tip suction pressure during thrombus engagement. Therefore, this study aimed to compare aspiration forces and pressure drops, generated by mechanical pumps and 60-cc syringes connected to various catheters when aspirating synthetic clots in a 3-dimensional-printed model.

Methods: The system includes a programmable pulsatile pump, a 3-dimensional-printed tissue-matched circle of Willis model, radiopaque synthetic blood clots positioned in the left internal carotid artery terminus, and pressure recording at 500 ± 10% mL/min and 120/80 ± 10 mm Hg. Each catheter underwent 3 soft and hard clot removal trials using a 60-cc syringe and an aspiration pump. Aspiration source pressure was recorded before, during, and after aspiration. The evaluated variables included engagement pressure change (∆Pengagement), aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration), and pressure efficiency (PE), defined as the percentage of peak pressure maintained during aspiration.

Results: Aspirating soft clots with syringes showed low engagement pressure drops (∆Pengagement) (0-14 mm Hg), high PE at 93%-99% of Pp, and minimal aspiration pressure drops (∆Paspiration) (6F catheters: 4-8 mm Hg, 8F catheters: 19 mm Hg). Conversely, using a pump generated moderate ∆Pengagement (6F: 16-51 mm Hg, 8F: 122 mm Hg), lower PE (69%-93% of Pp), and greater ∆Paspiration (6F: 143-151 mm Hg, 8F: 270 mm Hg). For hard clots, syringes exhibited minimal ∆Pengagement and ∆Paspiration (4-13 mm Hg and 3-12 mm Hg, respectively), whereas pumps showed moderate ∆Pengagement (2-34 mm Hg) and large ∆Paspiration (6F: 82-162 mm Hg, 8F: 280 mm Hg).

Conclusion: Syringe aspiration generates higher vacuum pressures and smaller pressure drops than aspiration pumps, likely because of vacuum tubing resistance in aspiration pumps. This effect is particularly evident with hard clots and larger inner diameter catheters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信