{"title":"GeneXpert MTB/RIF和GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra在结核病诊断中的比较评价。","authors":"İhsan Topaloğlu, Yelda Varol, Can Biçmen, Onur Karaman, Serir Aktoğu Özkan","doi":"10.5578/tt.2025021052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies have shown that Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert-U) tests outperform traditional microbiological methods in detecting tuberculosis (TB) and identifying rifampicin resistance. This research aimed to examine their diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older with pulmonary or extrapulmonary samples analyzed by Xpert, Xpert-U, and conventional diagnostic methods between January 2016 and June 2020. The diagnostic performance of Xpert and Xpert-U was compared across four patient groups: A) Microscopy-culture-positive pulmonary TB, B) Microscopy-negative, culture-positive pulmonary TB, C) Pulmonary TB cases, and D) Extrapulmonary TB cases.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 1.366 samples (1.280 pulmonary, 86 extrapulmonary) were analyzed using Xpert and Xpert-U, including 1.042 males (76.3%) and 324 females (23.7%), with an average age of 54 years. For pulmonary TB, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 99.29% and specificity of 49.23%. Xpert-U demonstrated similar sensitivity at 98.56%, with an improved specificity of 89.66%. In extrapulmonary TB, Xpert-U achieved 100% sensitivity with a specificity of 70.59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xpert and Xpert-U tests offer high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, greatly improving the timely diagnosis and management of TB, especially in cases with low bacterial loads or drug resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"73 2","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GeneXpert MTB/RIF and GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra in tuberculosis diagnosis: A comparative evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"İhsan Topaloğlu, Yelda Varol, Can Biçmen, Onur Karaman, Serir Aktoğu Özkan\",\"doi\":\"10.5578/tt.2025021052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies have shown that Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert-U) tests outperform traditional microbiological methods in detecting tuberculosis (TB) and identifying rifampicin resistance. This research aimed to examine their diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older with pulmonary or extrapulmonary samples analyzed by Xpert, Xpert-U, and conventional diagnostic methods between January 2016 and June 2020. The diagnostic performance of Xpert and Xpert-U was compared across four patient groups: A) Microscopy-culture-positive pulmonary TB, B) Microscopy-negative, culture-positive pulmonary TB, C) Pulmonary TB cases, and D) Extrapulmonary TB cases.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 1.366 samples (1.280 pulmonary, 86 extrapulmonary) were analyzed using Xpert and Xpert-U, including 1.042 males (76.3%) and 324 females (23.7%), with an average age of 54 years. For pulmonary TB, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 99.29% and specificity of 49.23%. Xpert-U demonstrated similar sensitivity at 98.56%, with an improved specificity of 89.66%. In extrapulmonary TB, Xpert-U achieved 100% sensitivity with a specificity of 70.59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xpert and Xpert-U tests offer high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, greatly improving the timely diagnosis and management of TB, especially in cases with low bacterial loads or drug resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberkuloz ve toraks\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"144-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberkuloz ve toraks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.2025021052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.2025021052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
GeneXpert MTB/RIF and GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra in tuberculosis diagnosis: A comparative evaluation.
Introduction: Recent studies have shown that Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert-U) tests outperform traditional microbiological methods in detecting tuberculosis (TB) and identifying rifampicin resistance. This research aimed to examine their diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance.
Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older with pulmonary or extrapulmonary samples analyzed by Xpert, Xpert-U, and conventional diagnostic methods between January 2016 and June 2020. The diagnostic performance of Xpert and Xpert-U was compared across four patient groups: A) Microscopy-culture-positive pulmonary TB, B) Microscopy-negative, culture-positive pulmonary TB, C) Pulmonary TB cases, and D) Extrapulmonary TB cases.
Result: A total of 1.366 samples (1.280 pulmonary, 86 extrapulmonary) were analyzed using Xpert and Xpert-U, including 1.042 males (76.3%) and 324 females (23.7%), with an average age of 54 years. For pulmonary TB, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 99.29% and specificity of 49.23%. Xpert-U demonstrated similar sensitivity at 98.56%, with an improved specificity of 89.66%. In extrapulmonary TB, Xpert-U achieved 100% sensitivity with a specificity of 70.59%.
Conclusions: Xpert and Xpert-U tests offer high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, greatly improving the timely diagnosis and management of TB, especially in cases with low bacterial loads or drug resistance.