GeneXpert MTB/RIF和GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra在结核病诊断中的比较评价。

İhsan Topaloğlu, Yelda Varol, Can Biçmen, Onur Karaman, Serir Aktoğu Özkan
{"title":"GeneXpert MTB/RIF和GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra在结核病诊断中的比较评价。","authors":"İhsan Topaloğlu, Yelda Varol, Can Biçmen, Onur Karaman, Serir Aktoğu Özkan","doi":"10.5578/tt.2025021052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies have shown that Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert-U) tests outperform traditional microbiological methods in detecting tuberculosis (TB) and identifying rifampicin resistance. This research aimed to examine their diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older with pulmonary or extrapulmonary samples analyzed by Xpert, Xpert-U, and conventional diagnostic methods between January 2016 and June 2020. The diagnostic performance of Xpert and Xpert-U was compared across four patient groups: A) Microscopy-culture-positive pulmonary TB, B) Microscopy-negative, culture-positive pulmonary TB, C) Pulmonary TB cases, and D) Extrapulmonary TB cases.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 1.366 samples (1.280 pulmonary, 86 extrapulmonary) were analyzed using Xpert and Xpert-U, including 1.042 males (76.3%) and 324 females (23.7%), with an average age of 54 years. For pulmonary TB, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 99.29% and specificity of 49.23%. Xpert-U demonstrated similar sensitivity at 98.56%, with an improved specificity of 89.66%. In extrapulmonary TB, Xpert-U achieved 100% sensitivity with a specificity of 70.59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xpert and Xpert-U tests offer high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, greatly improving the timely diagnosis and management of TB, especially in cases with low bacterial loads or drug resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"73 2","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GeneXpert MTB/RIF and GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra in tuberculosis diagnosis: A comparative evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"İhsan Topaloğlu, Yelda Varol, Can Biçmen, Onur Karaman, Serir Aktoğu Özkan\",\"doi\":\"10.5578/tt.2025021052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent studies have shown that Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert-U) tests outperform traditional microbiological methods in detecting tuberculosis (TB) and identifying rifampicin resistance. This research aimed to examine their diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older with pulmonary or extrapulmonary samples analyzed by Xpert, Xpert-U, and conventional diagnostic methods between January 2016 and June 2020. The diagnostic performance of Xpert and Xpert-U was compared across four patient groups: A) Microscopy-culture-positive pulmonary TB, B) Microscopy-negative, culture-positive pulmonary TB, C) Pulmonary TB cases, and D) Extrapulmonary TB cases.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 1.366 samples (1.280 pulmonary, 86 extrapulmonary) were analyzed using Xpert and Xpert-U, including 1.042 males (76.3%) and 324 females (23.7%), with an average age of 54 years. For pulmonary TB, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 99.29% and specificity of 49.23%. Xpert-U demonstrated similar sensitivity at 98.56%, with an improved specificity of 89.66%. In extrapulmonary TB, Xpert-U achieved 100% sensitivity with a specificity of 70.59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Xpert and Xpert-U tests offer high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, greatly improving the timely diagnosis and management of TB, especially in cases with low bacterial loads or drug resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberkuloz ve toraks\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"144-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberkuloz ve toraks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.2025021052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.2025021052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究表明,基因Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert)和基因Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert- u)检测在检测结核病和鉴定利福平耐药性方面优于传统的微生物学方法。本研究旨在检验其诊断准确性和临床相关性。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年1月至2020年6月期间,年龄在18岁及以上,采用Xpert、expert - u和常规诊断方法分析肺或肺外样本的患者。比较了Xpert和专家- u在四组患者中的诊断性能:A)显微镜培养阳性肺结核,B)显微镜培养阴性肺结核,C)肺结核病例,D)肺外结核病例。结果:Xpert和Xpert- u共分析样本1.366例(肺样本1.280例,肺外样本86例),其中男性1.042例(76.3%),女性324例(23.7%),平均年龄54岁。对于肺结核,Xpert的总灵敏度为99.29%,特异性为49.23%。expert - u的灵敏度为98.56%,特异度提高到89.66%。在肺外结核中,expert - u的灵敏度为100%,特异性为70.59%。结论:Xpert和expert - u检测对结核分枝杆菌的检测灵敏度高,大大提高了结核病的及时诊断和管理,特别是在细菌负荷低或耐药病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GeneXpert MTB/RIF and GeneXpert MTB/RIF ultra in tuberculosis diagnosis: A comparative evaluation.

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that Gene Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF ultra (Xpert-U) tests outperform traditional microbiological methods in detecting tuberculosis (TB) and identifying rifampicin resistance. This research aimed to examine their diagnostic accuracy and clinical relevance.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years and older with pulmonary or extrapulmonary samples analyzed by Xpert, Xpert-U, and conventional diagnostic methods between January 2016 and June 2020. The diagnostic performance of Xpert and Xpert-U was compared across four patient groups: A) Microscopy-culture-positive pulmonary TB, B) Microscopy-negative, culture-positive pulmonary TB, C) Pulmonary TB cases, and D) Extrapulmonary TB cases.

Result: A total of 1.366 samples (1.280 pulmonary, 86 extrapulmonary) were analyzed using Xpert and Xpert-U, including 1.042 males (76.3%) and 324 females (23.7%), with an average age of 54 years. For pulmonary TB, Xpert showed an overall sensitivity of 99.29% and specificity of 49.23%. Xpert-U demonstrated similar sensitivity at 98.56%, with an improved specificity of 89.66%. In extrapulmonary TB, Xpert-U achieved 100% sensitivity with a specificity of 70.59%.

Conclusions: Xpert and Xpert-U tests offer high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, greatly improving the timely diagnosis and management of TB, especially in cases with low bacterial loads or drug resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信