{"title":"在COVID-19大流行的两个阶段,埃塞俄比亚环境中妊娠中期安全堕胎服务的使用趋势:一项横断面研究","authors":"Abraham Fessehaye Sium, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno","doi":"10.1002/puh2.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing abortion services during pandemics without interruption is essential. The objective of the study was to compare the utilization of second-trimester safe abortion care services between early pandemic and peak pandemic months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective comparative study of second-trimester safe abortion service provision during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia (April 2021) versus during that of early pandemic (April 2020). Data were collected using data extraction form from MICHU clinic HMIS registry. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Chi-squared test and simple descriptive statistics were applied as appropriate. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 was used to describe the significance of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significantly more second-trimester abortions performed during the peak pandemic month as compared to early pandemic month (32.6% vs. 67.4%, respectively). Nearly half of the abortions were done for maternal health problems (47.8%, 44/92), and of which over 80% of them used medical methods for abortion (83.7%, 77/92). There was only one case of dilation and evacuation (D&E) during the early pandemic, compared to 14 D&E procedures during the pandemic peak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant increment in the second-trimester abortion service coverage during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. The measures we took during the early pandemic: increasing public awareness about continuation of abortion care services during the pandemic, change in the attitude of care-providers, and early sticking to national guidelines on essential care during COVID-19 should be passed on as important lessons for future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":"3 3","pages":"e210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Second-Trimester Safe Abortion Service Utilization During the Two Phases of COVID-19 Pandemic in an Ethiopian Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Fessehaye Sium, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/puh2.210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing abortion services during pandemics without interruption is essential. The objective of the study was to compare the utilization of second-trimester safe abortion care services between early pandemic and peak pandemic months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective comparative study of second-trimester safe abortion service provision during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia (April 2021) versus during that of early pandemic (April 2020). Data were collected using data extraction form from MICHU clinic HMIS registry. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Chi-squared test and simple descriptive statistics were applied as appropriate. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 was used to describe the significance of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significantly more second-trimester abortions performed during the peak pandemic month as compared to early pandemic month (32.6% vs. 67.4%, respectively). Nearly half of the abortions were done for maternal health problems (47.8%, 44/92), and of which over 80% of them used medical methods for abortion (83.7%, 77/92). There was only one case of dilation and evacuation (D&E) during the early pandemic, compared to 14 D&E procedures during the pandemic peak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant increment in the second-trimester abortion service coverage during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. The measures we took during the early pandemic: increasing public awareness about continuation of abortion care services during the pandemic, change in the attitude of care-providers, and early sticking to national guidelines on essential care during COVID-19 should be passed on as important lessons for future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public health challenges\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"e210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public health challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在大流行期间不间断地提供堕胎服务至关重要。该研究的目的是比较大流行早期和大流行高峰期中期安全流产护理服务的使用情况。方法:我们对埃塞俄比亚2019冠状病毒病大流行高峰期(2021年4月)和大流行早期(2020年4月)的中期安全堕胎服务提供情况进行了回顾性比较研究。使用数据提取表从MICHU诊所HMIS注册表中收集数据。数据分析采用SPSS version 23。适当采用卡方检验和简单描述性统计。采用小于0.05的p值来描述结果的显著性。结果:与大流行早期相比,在大流行高峰期进行的妊娠中期流产明显更多(分别为32.6%对67.4%)。近一半的堕胎是由于孕产妇健康问题(47.8%,44/92),其中80%以上的人使用医疗方法堕胎(83.7%,77/92)。在大流行早期,只有一例扩张和疏散(D&E),而在大流行高峰期,有14例扩张和疏散程序。结论:在2019冠状病毒病疫情高峰期,妊娠中期堕胎服务覆盖率显著增加。我们在大流行早期采取的措施:提高公众对大流行期间继续提供堕胎护理服务的认识,改变护理提供者的态度,以及在COVID-19期间尽早坚持国家基本护理指南,这些措施应该作为未来大流行的重要经验教训加以传承。
Trends in Second-Trimester Safe Abortion Service Utilization During the Two Phases of COVID-19 Pandemic in an Ethiopian Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Background: Providing abortion services during pandemics without interruption is essential. The objective of the study was to compare the utilization of second-trimester safe abortion care services between early pandemic and peak pandemic months.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study of second-trimester safe abortion service provision during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia (April 2021) versus during that of early pandemic (April 2020). Data were collected using data extraction form from MICHU clinic HMIS registry. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Chi-squared test and simple descriptive statistics were applied as appropriate. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to describe the significance of the results.
Results: There were significantly more second-trimester abortions performed during the peak pandemic month as compared to early pandemic month (32.6% vs. 67.4%, respectively). Nearly half of the abortions were done for maternal health problems (47.8%, 44/92), and of which over 80% of them used medical methods for abortion (83.7%, 77/92). There was only one case of dilation and evacuation (D&E) during the early pandemic, compared to 14 D&E procedures during the pandemic peak.
Conclusion: We found a significant increment in the second-trimester abortion service coverage during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. The measures we took during the early pandemic: increasing public awareness about continuation of abortion care services during the pandemic, change in the attitude of care-providers, and early sticking to national guidelines on essential care during COVID-19 should be passed on as important lessons for future pandemics.