坦桑尼亚卡拉图地区鼠疫流行地区啮齿动物跳蚤负担及其相关决定因素:一项横断面研究。

Public health challenges Pub Date : 2024-06-22 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1002/puh2.201
Joshua Reuben Jakoniko, Apia Massawe, Elisa Daniel Mwega, Stella Thadeus Kessy
{"title":"坦桑尼亚卡拉图地区鼠疫流行地区啮齿动物跳蚤负担及其相关决定因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Joshua Reuben Jakoniko, Apia Massawe, Elisa Daniel Mwega, Stella Thadeus Kessy","doi":"10.1002/puh2.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fleas infest rodents and other small mammals, serving as vectors for zoonotic diseases such as plague. This study investigates the flea burden on rodents and its associated determinants within the plague-endemic localities of Karatu district, Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional design was employed to capture rodents with Sherman traps in farmland, peridomestic area, bush land, and forest buffer zones across the wet and dry seasons of 2022 in plague and nonplague foci villages. Captured rodents were anaesthetized and thoroughly brushed to collect fleas, which were then identified using a dichotomous key.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 291 rodents (9 species) were captured, from which 190 fleas (4 species) were collected. The collected fleas were <i>Dinopsyllus lypusus</i> (46.32%), <i>Ctenophthalmus</i> sp (26.84%), <i>Xenopsylla brasiliensis</i> (16.32%), and <i>Xenopsylla cheopis</i> (10.53%). Approximately 38.42% of fleas were found on <i>Mastomys natalensis</i>, 22.63% on <i>Lemniscomys striatus</i>, and 18.42% on <i>Rattus rattus</i>. High flea abundance was recorded in farmland and peridomestic areas. The specific flea index (SFI) of <i>X. cheopis</i> on <i>R. rattus</i> was 1.0 in plague foci and <0.5 in nonplague foci. A generalized linear model revealed significant influences of rodent species, season, habitats, rodent weight, sex, and plague locations on flea abundance. Significant variation was observed between rodent sexes (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and a weak positive correlation existed between rodent weight and flea abundance (<i>R</i> = 0.17, <i>p </i>< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Villages in plague foci exhibited higher abundances of fleas in comparison to nonplague foci villages. The SFI results for <i>X. cheopis</i> on rats in both types of villages did not surpass critical thresholds. Factors such as dry season, farmlands, and rodent characteristics influenced flea abundance on rodents in the study area.</p>","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":"3 2","pages":"e201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flea Burden on Rodents and Its Associated Determinants in Plague-Endemic Localities of Karatu District, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Reuben Jakoniko, Apia Massawe, Elisa Daniel Mwega, Stella Thadeus Kessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/puh2.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fleas infest rodents and other small mammals, serving as vectors for zoonotic diseases such as plague. This study investigates the flea burden on rodents and its associated determinants within the plague-endemic localities of Karatu district, Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional design was employed to capture rodents with Sherman traps in farmland, peridomestic area, bush land, and forest buffer zones across the wet and dry seasons of 2022 in plague and nonplague foci villages. Captured rodents were anaesthetized and thoroughly brushed to collect fleas, which were then identified using a dichotomous key.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 291 rodents (9 species) were captured, from which 190 fleas (4 species) were collected. The collected fleas were <i>Dinopsyllus lypusus</i> (46.32%), <i>Ctenophthalmus</i> sp (26.84%), <i>Xenopsylla brasiliensis</i> (16.32%), and <i>Xenopsylla cheopis</i> (10.53%). Approximately 38.42% of fleas were found on <i>Mastomys natalensis</i>, 22.63% on <i>Lemniscomys striatus</i>, and 18.42% on <i>Rattus rattus</i>. High flea abundance was recorded in farmland and peridomestic areas. The specific flea index (SFI) of <i>X. cheopis</i> on <i>R. rattus</i> was 1.0 in plague foci and <0.5 in nonplague foci. A generalized linear model revealed significant influences of rodent species, season, habitats, rodent weight, sex, and plague locations on flea abundance. Significant variation was observed between rodent sexes (<i>p</i> = 0.009), and a weak positive correlation existed between rodent weight and flea abundance (<i>R</i> = 0.17, <i>p </i>< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Villages in plague foci exhibited higher abundances of fleas in comparison to nonplague foci villages. The SFI results for <i>X. cheopis</i> on rats in both types of villages did not surpass critical thresholds. Factors such as dry season, farmlands, and rodent characteristics influenced flea abundance on rodents in the study area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public health challenges\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"e201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public health challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跳蚤感染啮齿动物和其他小型哺乳动物,是鼠疫等人畜共患疾病的媒介。本研究调查了坦桑尼亚卡拉图地区鼠疫流行地区啮齿动物的跳蚤负担及其相关决定因素。方法:采用重复横断面设计,于2022年湿季和旱季在鼠疫和非鼠疫疫区村庄的农田、居民区、灌木地和森林缓冲区采用Sherman夹鼠法捕鼠。对捕获的啮齿动物进行麻醉并彻底刷洗以收集跳蚤,然后使用二分法识别跳蚤。结果:共捕获鼠类9种291只,捕获蚤类4种190只。采集到的蚤类分别为:鸭爪蚤(46.32%)、栉眼蚤(26.84%)、巴西爪蚤(16.32%)和非洲爪蚤(10.53%)。蚤类以白胸胸鼠为38.42%,纹状胸胸鼠为22.63%,家鼠为18.42%。农田和居民区蚤数较高。鼠体重与鼠蚤丰度呈弱正相关(R = 0.17, p)。结论:鼠疫疫源地村蚤丰度高于非鼠疫疫源地村。两种村寨鼠类对印度蠓的SFI检测结果均未超过临界阈值。旱季、农田、鼠类特征等因素影响研究区鼠类蚤类数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flea Burden on Rodents and Its Associated Determinants in Plague-Endemic Localities of Karatu District, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Fleas infest rodents and other small mammals, serving as vectors for zoonotic diseases such as plague. This study investigates the flea burden on rodents and its associated determinants within the plague-endemic localities of Karatu district, Tanzania.

Methods: A repeated cross-sectional design was employed to capture rodents with Sherman traps in farmland, peridomestic area, bush land, and forest buffer zones across the wet and dry seasons of 2022 in plague and nonplague foci villages. Captured rodents were anaesthetized and thoroughly brushed to collect fleas, which were then identified using a dichotomous key.

Results: A total of 291 rodents (9 species) were captured, from which 190 fleas (4 species) were collected. The collected fleas were Dinopsyllus lypusus (46.32%), Ctenophthalmus sp (26.84%), Xenopsylla brasiliensis (16.32%), and Xenopsylla cheopis (10.53%). Approximately 38.42% of fleas were found on Mastomys natalensis, 22.63% on Lemniscomys striatus, and 18.42% on Rattus rattus. High flea abundance was recorded in farmland and peridomestic areas. The specific flea index (SFI) of X. cheopis on R. rattus was 1.0 in plague foci and <0.5 in nonplague foci. A generalized linear model revealed significant influences of rodent species, season, habitats, rodent weight, sex, and plague locations on flea abundance. Significant variation was observed between rodent sexes (p = 0.009), and a weak positive correlation existed between rodent weight and flea abundance (R = 0.17, < 0.05).

Conclusion: Villages in plague foci exhibited higher abundances of fleas in comparison to nonplague foci villages. The SFI results for X. cheopis on rats in both types of villages did not surpass critical thresholds. Factors such as dry season, farmlands, and rodent characteristics influenced flea abundance on rodents in the study area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信