制定和执行部门间卫生政策的推动因素和障碍:来自墨西哥的经验教训。

Public health challenges Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1002/puh2.190
Adolfo Martinez-Valle, Alejandro Figueroa-Lara
{"title":"制定和执行部门间卫生政策的推动因素和障碍:来自墨西哥的经验教训。","authors":"Adolfo Martinez-Valle, Alejandro Figueroa-Lara","doi":"10.1002/puh2.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study analyzes how national intersectoral public policy experiences have been adopted and implemented using a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach in the past two decades. It seeks to provide evidence on enabling factors that triggered three effective intersectoral public policies to improve population health in Mexico by improving nutritional, educational, and healthcare access conditions, reducing road traffic injuries, and addressing obesogenic feeding practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed a qualitative approach to analyze the three intersectoral public policies selected as case studies. First, we designed an analytical framework to assess how intersectoral public policies are adopted, implemented, and sustained. The proposed framework is based on peer-reviewed articles and gray public policy literature. Second, we used information from eleven semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders conducted in previous research to identify more specific enablers and barriers of the three intersectoral policies selected according to predefined analytical categories used in the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed three overall key findings. First, sound empirical evidence is essential for adopting a HiAP approach. Second, effective intersectoral mechanisms enhance implementation feasibility. Third, results-based monitoring and evaluation contribute to the continuity of the analyzed intersectoral public policies. Finally, political support is needed throughout the policy process to maintain governance capacity and deliver results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We drew five global policy lessons that may be applicable in similar public policy settings in other countries. First, both technical and political enablers help set the intersectoral agenda. Second, effective communication is instrumental in convincing all stakeholders to address public health-related policy issues. Third, political support at the highest level possible and the federal government's capacity are essential to implement sound policies. Fourth, several enablers exist for enhancing collaboration between ministries during implementation. Finally, monitoring and evaluation results are necessary for sustaining intersectoral policies beyond administrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":"3 2","pages":"e190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enablers and obstacles for designing and implementing intersectoral health policies: Lessons from Mexico.\",\"authors\":\"Adolfo Martinez-Valle, Alejandro Figueroa-Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/puh2.190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study analyzes how national intersectoral public policy experiences have been adopted and implemented using a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach in the past two decades. It seeks to provide evidence on enabling factors that triggered three effective intersectoral public policies to improve population health in Mexico by improving nutritional, educational, and healthcare access conditions, reducing road traffic injuries, and addressing obesogenic feeding practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed a qualitative approach to analyze the three intersectoral public policies selected as case studies. First, we designed an analytical framework to assess how intersectoral public policies are adopted, implemented, and sustained. The proposed framework is based on peer-reviewed articles and gray public policy literature. Second, we used information from eleven semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders conducted in previous research to identify more specific enablers and barriers of the three intersectoral policies selected according to predefined analytical categories used in the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis showed three overall key findings. First, sound empirical evidence is essential for adopting a HiAP approach. Second, effective intersectoral mechanisms enhance implementation feasibility. Third, results-based monitoring and evaluation contribute to the continuity of the analyzed intersectoral public policies. Finally, political support is needed throughout the policy process to maintain governance capacity and deliver results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We drew five global policy lessons that may be applicable in similar public policy settings in other countries. First, both technical and political enablers help set the intersectoral agenda. Second, effective communication is instrumental in convincing all stakeholders to address public health-related policy issues. Third, political support at the highest level possible and the federal government's capacity are essential to implement sound policies. Fourth, several enablers exist for enhancing collaboration between ministries during implementation. Finally, monitoring and evaluation results are necessary for sustaining intersectoral policies beyond administrations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public health challenges\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"e190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public health challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究分析了在过去二十年中,国家部门间公共政策经验是如何采用和实施“全民健康政策”(HiAP)方法的。它力求提供证据,说明促成三项有效的跨部门公共政策的有利因素,这些政策旨在通过改善营养、教育和医疗保健获取条件、减少道路交通伤害和解决致肥喂养做法来改善墨西哥的人口健康。方法:采用定性分析的方法,选取三个跨部门公共政策作为个案研究。首先,我们设计了一个分析框架来评估跨部门公共政策是如何被采纳、实施和维持的。拟议的框架是基于同行评议的文章和灰色的公共政策文献。其次,我们使用了先前研究中与关键利益相关者进行的11次半结构化访谈的信息,以确定根据问卷中使用的预定义分析类别选择的三个部门间政策的更具体的推动因素和障碍。结果:分析显示了三个总体关键发现。首先,可靠的经验证据对于采用HiAP方法至关重要。第二,有效的部门间机制提高了实施的可行性。第三,基于结果的监测和评价有助于所分析的部门间公共政策的连续性。最后,在整个政策过程中都需要政治支持,以保持治理能力并取得成果。结论:我们总结了可能适用于其他国家类似公共政策制定的5条全球政策经验。首先,技术和政治因素都有助于制定部门间议程。第二,有效的沟通有助于说服所有利益攸关方处理与公共卫生有关的政策问题。第三,最高级别的政治支持和联邦政府的能力对于实施健全的政策至关重要。第四,在实施过程中,存在一些促进部委之间合作的因素。最后,监测和评价结果对于在行政部门之外维持部门间政策是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enablers and obstacles for designing and implementing intersectoral health policies: Lessons from Mexico.

Background: This study analyzes how national intersectoral public policy experiences have been adopted and implemented using a Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach in the past two decades. It seeks to provide evidence on enabling factors that triggered three effective intersectoral public policies to improve population health in Mexico by improving nutritional, educational, and healthcare access conditions, reducing road traffic injuries, and addressing obesogenic feeding practices.

Methods: We followed a qualitative approach to analyze the three intersectoral public policies selected as case studies. First, we designed an analytical framework to assess how intersectoral public policies are adopted, implemented, and sustained. The proposed framework is based on peer-reviewed articles and gray public policy literature. Second, we used information from eleven semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders conducted in previous research to identify more specific enablers and barriers of the three intersectoral policies selected according to predefined analytical categories used in the questionnaire.

Results: The analysis showed three overall key findings. First, sound empirical evidence is essential for adopting a HiAP approach. Second, effective intersectoral mechanisms enhance implementation feasibility. Third, results-based monitoring and evaluation contribute to the continuity of the analyzed intersectoral public policies. Finally, political support is needed throughout the policy process to maintain governance capacity and deliver results.

Conclusion: We drew five global policy lessons that may be applicable in similar public policy settings in other countries. First, both technical and political enablers help set the intersectoral agenda. Second, effective communication is instrumental in convincing all stakeholders to address public health-related policy issues. Third, political support at the highest level possible and the federal government's capacity are essential to implement sound policies. Fourth, several enablers exist for enhancing collaboration between ministries during implementation. Finally, monitoring and evaluation results are necessary for sustaining intersectoral policies beyond administrations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信