乌尔都语翻译和验证成本-事实工具评估在巴基斯坦诊断为癌症的患者的财务毒性。

Journal of cancer & allied specialties Pub Date : 2025-05-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2478/jcas-2025-0004
Muhammad Tayyab Ul Hasan Siddiqui, Sehar Salim Virani, Fatima Shaukat, Asfia Arham Khursheed, Lubna Saleem, Abid Jamal, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Syed Nabeel Zafar
{"title":"乌尔都语翻译和验证成本-事实工具评估在巴基斯坦诊断为癌症的患者的财务毒性。","authors":"Muhammad Tayyab Ul Hasan Siddiqui, Sehar Salim Virani, Fatima Shaukat, Asfia Arham Khursheed, Lubna Saleem, Abid Jamal, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Syed Nabeel Zafar","doi":"10.2478/jcas-2025-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer treatment can impose a significant financial burden on patients, impacting their quality of life. The COST-FACIT tool is commonly used to assess financial toxicity (FT) in cancer patients. This study aimed to translate and validate an Urdu version of the COST-FACIT tool in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at four tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan, from October to December 2023. We translated and back-translated the 12-item COST-FACIT tool and validated it in accordance with FACIT guidelines. The study included 10 native Urdu-speaking cancer patients as recommended in the guidelines. The analysis included descriptive statistics, content validity indices, and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, analyzed with Stata MP v.14 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 6 females (60%) and 4 males (40%), with most participants aged between 40 and 60 years (4 patients, 40%). The mean FACIT COST score was 16.3 (SD = 11.255, range 4-40), with 6 (60%) patients experiencing moderate (Grade 2) financial toxicity. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90, and content validity indices indicated items were relevant and clear (average expert CVI = 0.82 for relevance, 0.90 for clarity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have translated and validated an Urdu version of the COST-FACIT tool. It is a valid and reliable instrument to assess financial toxicity experienced by cancer patients in Pakistan.</p>","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"11 1","pages":"17-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urdu Translation and Validation of the COST-FACIT Tool for Assessing Financial Toxicity Among Patients Diagnosed with Cancer in Pakistan.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Tayyab Ul Hasan Siddiqui, Sehar Salim Virani, Fatima Shaukat, Asfia Arham Khursheed, Lubna Saleem, Abid Jamal, Muhammad Rizwan Khan, Syed Nabeel Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jcas-2025-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer treatment can impose a significant financial burden on patients, impacting their quality of life. The COST-FACIT tool is commonly used to assess financial toxicity (FT) in cancer patients. This study aimed to translate and validate an Urdu version of the COST-FACIT tool in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at four tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan, from October to December 2023. We translated and back-translated the 12-item COST-FACIT tool and validated it in accordance with FACIT guidelines. The study included 10 native Urdu-speaking cancer patients as recommended in the guidelines. The analysis included descriptive statistics, content validity indices, and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, analyzed with Stata MP v.14 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 6 females (60%) and 4 males (40%), with most participants aged between 40 and 60 years (4 patients, 40%). The mean FACIT COST score was 16.3 (SD = 11.255, range 4-40), with 6 (60%) patients experiencing moderate (Grade 2) financial toxicity. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90, and content validity indices indicated items were relevant and clear (average expert CVI = 0.82 for relevance, 0.90 for clarity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have translated and validated an Urdu version of the COST-FACIT tool. It is a valid and reliable instrument to assess financial toxicity experienced by cancer patients in Pakistan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer & allied specialties\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"17-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147700/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer & allied specialties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jcas-2025-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jcas-2025-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:癌症治疗会给患者带来巨大的经济负担,影响他们的生活质量。成本- facit工具通常用于评估癌症患者的财务毒性(FT)。本研究的目的是在巴基斯坦翻译和验证成本- facit工具的乌尔都语版本。材料和方法:于2023年10月至12月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的四家三级保健医院进行了一项横断面验证研究。我们翻译和反翻译了12项成本-FACIT工具,并根据FACIT指南对其进行了验证。该研究纳入了指南中推荐的10名母语为乌尔都语的癌症患者。分析包括描述性统计、内容效度指标和内部一致性评估,使用Stata MP v.14软件进行分析。结果:研究人群中女性6例(60%),男性4例(40%),年龄以40 ~ 60岁为主(4例,40%)。平均FACIT COST评分为16.3 (SD = 11.255,范围4-40),6例(60%)患者出现中度(2级)财务毒性。内部一致性良好,Cronbach's alpha为0.90,内容效度指标表明项目相关且清晰(专家平均CVI = 0.82相关性,0.90清晰度)。结论:我们已经翻译并验证了一个乌尔都语版本的COST-FACIT工具。这是一个有效和可靠的工具来评估巴基斯坦癌症患者所经历的财务毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urdu Translation and Validation of the COST-FACIT Tool for Assessing Financial Toxicity Among Patients Diagnosed with Cancer in Pakistan.

Introduction: Cancer treatment can impose a significant financial burden on patients, impacting their quality of life. The COST-FACIT tool is commonly used to assess financial toxicity (FT) in cancer patients. This study aimed to translate and validate an Urdu version of the COST-FACIT tool in Pakistan.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted at four tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan, from October to December 2023. We translated and back-translated the 12-item COST-FACIT tool and validated it in accordance with FACIT guidelines. The study included 10 native Urdu-speaking cancer patients as recommended in the guidelines. The analysis included descriptive statistics, content validity indices, and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, analyzed with Stata MP v.14 software.

Results: The study population included 6 females (60%) and 4 males (40%), with most participants aged between 40 and 60 years (4 patients, 40%). The mean FACIT COST score was 16.3 (SD = 11.255, range 4-40), with 6 (60%) patients experiencing moderate (Grade 2) financial toxicity. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90, and content validity indices indicated items were relevant and clear (average expert CVI = 0.82 for relevance, 0.90 for clarity).

Conclusion: We have translated and validated an Urdu version of the COST-FACIT tool. It is a valid and reliable instrument to assess financial toxicity experienced by cancer patients in Pakistan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信