比较三种水生海龟的功能性免疫反应。

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Isabella V Davis, Jennifer Terry, Lorin A Neuman-Lee
{"title":"比较三种水生海龟的功能性免疫反应。","authors":"Isabella V Davis, Jennifer Terry, Lorin A Neuman-Lee","doi":"10.1093/icb/icaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reptiles are increasingly faced with conservation challenges and ecoimmunological techniques would be a beneficial tool in monitoring and evaluating populations that are at-risk. However, the reptilian immune system is poorly understood, and few studies have made intraspecies comparisons, making generalizations difficult. To help address this gap, innate immune function across three conspecific freshwater turtle species was evaluated. Red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans), Mississippi mud (Kinosternon subrubrum hippocrepis), and musk turtles (Sternotherus odoratus), are found throughout the Southeastern United States and represent different ecological microhabitats and life histories. In spring 2024, male aquatic turtles were caught using hoop nets, and blood samples were taken to assess immune characteristics. Microbial killing assays were conducted using multiple blood serum and buffy layer (hereafter referred as \"serum + BL\") manipulations (fresh, frozen, and frozen + heat manipulated serum + BL) as well as three microbes that activate specific immunological responses: Gram-positive bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative bacterium (Escherichia coli) and a fungus (Candida albicans). By using this suite of microbial assays, differences in immune prioritization can be observed across species. This study revealed that there are differences in immunocompetence in each species of freshwater turtle that varied by microbe and serum + BL manipulation. We determined that because of the contribution of complement proteins when challenged against Gram-negative bacteria, frozen manipulated serum + BL appears to be a reliable way to assess immunocompetence in individuals across turtle species. Conducting intraspecies comparisons in immune function using integrative approaches can provide valuable insight into the underlying patterns of physiological variability within wild organisms, especially those that are of conservation concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":54971,"journal":{"name":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing functional immune responses in three aquatic turtle species.\",\"authors\":\"Isabella V Davis, Jennifer Terry, Lorin A Neuman-Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icb/icaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reptiles are increasingly faced with conservation challenges and ecoimmunological techniques would be a beneficial tool in monitoring and evaluating populations that are at-risk. However, the reptilian immune system is poorly understood, and few studies have made intraspecies comparisons, making generalizations difficult. To help address this gap, innate immune function across three conspecific freshwater turtle species was evaluated. Red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans), Mississippi mud (Kinosternon subrubrum hippocrepis), and musk turtles (Sternotherus odoratus), are found throughout the Southeastern United States and represent different ecological microhabitats and life histories. In spring 2024, male aquatic turtles were caught using hoop nets, and blood samples were taken to assess immune characteristics. Microbial killing assays were conducted using multiple blood serum and buffy layer (hereafter referred as \\\"serum + BL\\\") manipulations (fresh, frozen, and frozen + heat manipulated serum + BL) as well as three microbes that activate specific immunological responses: Gram-positive bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative bacterium (Escherichia coli) and a fungus (Candida albicans). By using this suite of microbial assays, differences in immune prioritization can be observed across species. This study revealed that there are differences in immunocompetence in each species of freshwater turtle that varied by microbe and serum + BL manipulation. We determined that because of the contribution of complement proteins when challenged against Gram-negative bacteria, frozen manipulated serum + BL appears to be a reliable way to assess immunocompetence in individuals across turtle species. Conducting intraspecies comparisons in immune function using integrative approaches can provide valuable insight into the underlying patterns of physiological variability within wild organisms, especially those that are of conservation concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative and Comparative Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative and Comparative Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative and Comparative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爬行动物面临着越来越多的保护挑战,生态免疫学技术将是监测和评估处于危险中的种群的有益工具。然而,爬行动物的免疫系统知之甚少,并且很少有研究进行种内比较,这使得概括起来很困难。为了帮助解决这一差距,对三种同种淡水龟的先天免疫功能进行了评估。红耳滑鼠(Trachemys scripta elegans)、密西西比泥龟(Kinosternon subrubrum hippocrepis)和麝香龟(Sternotherus odoratus)遍布美国东南部,代表着不同的生态微栖息地和生活史。在2024年春季,用环形网捕获雄性水生海龟,并采集血液样本以评估免疫特征。微生物杀灭试验采用多种血清和血清+ BL(以下简称“血清+ BL”)处理方法(新鲜、冷冻和冷冻+热处理血清+ BL)以及激活特异性免疫反应的三种微生物:革兰氏阳性菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)、革兰氏阴性菌(大肠杆菌)和真菌(白色念珠菌)。通过使用这套微生物测定,可以观察到不同物种之间免疫优先级的差异。本研究发现,不同种类淡水龟的免疫能力因微生物和血清+ BL处理的不同而存在差异。我们确定,由于补体蛋白在革兰氏阴性菌攻击时的作用,冷冻处理血清+ BL似乎是评估海龟个体免疫能力的可靠方法。利用综合方法进行种内免疫功能比较,可以为了解野生生物,特别是那些具有保护意义的生物体内生理变异的潜在模式提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing functional immune responses in three aquatic turtle species.

Reptiles are increasingly faced with conservation challenges and ecoimmunological techniques would be a beneficial tool in monitoring and evaluating populations that are at-risk. However, the reptilian immune system is poorly understood, and few studies have made intraspecies comparisons, making generalizations difficult. To help address this gap, innate immune function across three conspecific freshwater turtle species was evaluated. Red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans), Mississippi mud (Kinosternon subrubrum hippocrepis), and musk turtles (Sternotherus odoratus), are found throughout the Southeastern United States and represent different ecological microhabitats and life histories. In spring 2024, male aquatic turtles were caught using hoop nets, and blood samples were taken to assess immune characteristics. Microbial killing assays were conducted using multiple blood serum and buffy layer (hereafter referred as "serum + BL") manipulations (fresh, frozen, and frozen + heat manipulated serum + BL) as well as three microbes that activate specific immunological responses: Gram-positive bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative bacterium (Escherichia coli) and a fungus (Candida albicans). By using this suite of microbial assays, differences in immune prioritization can be observed across species. This study revealed that there are differences in immunocompetence in each species of freshwater turtle that varied by microbe and serum + BL manipulation. We determined that because of the contribution of complement proteins when challenged against Gram-negative bacteria, frozen manipulated serum + BL appears to be a reliable way to assess immunocompetence in individuals across turtle species. Conducting intraspecies comparisons in immune function using integrative approaches can provide valuable insight into the underlying patterns of physiological variability within wild organisms, especially those that are of conservation concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative and Comparative Biology ( ICB ), formerly American Zoologist , is one of the most highly respected and cited journals in the field of biology. The journal''s primary focus is to integrate the varying disciplines in this broad field, while maintaining the highest scientific quality. ICB''s peer-reviewed symposia provide first class syntheses of the top research in a field. ICB also publishes book reviews, reports, and special bulletins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信