网站导航:访问在线资源,以确定是否有资格获得加拿大的增强和替代通信(AAC)技术。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jillian T Henderson, Tracy Shepherd, Shane Pinder, Beata Batorowicz, T Claire Davies
{"title":"网站导航:访问在线资源,以确定是否有资格获得加拿大的增强和替代通信(AAC)技术。","authors":"Jillian T Henderson, Tracy Shepherd, Shane Pinder, Beata Batorowicz, T Claire Davies","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2025.2499621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) systems enable interaction by persons with speech impairments, yet access to these devices is limited. In 2019, the Government of Canada introduced \"The Accessible Canada Act\" to reduce barriers. Availability of information online about AAC systems can reduce barriers to many Canadians who have difficulty attending in-person appointments. While Ontario's Assistive Device Program has been reviewed, other government-funded and charitable organizations across Canada have not been assessed for readability and accessibility. This research aims to evaluate the websites of organizations across Canada that provide AAC technology access, either through equipment loans or financial assistance programs. Forty-three eligible organizations were identified. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines scores (A, AA, and AAA) and four readability scores (Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, and age range) for each website were determined. Thirteen of 43 sites scored below the recommended standard of 75 for WCAG score, and Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease score indicated 86% were more difficult to read than standard recommendations for web content. To enhance equity in AAC device access, online availability of information and forms of government programs and charitable organizations must be easily understood and barrier-free.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Website navigation: Access to online resources to determine eligibility for augmentative & alternative communication (AAC) technology in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Jillian T Henderson, Tracy Shepherd, Shane Pinder, Beata Batorowicz, T Claire Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400435.2025.2499621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) systems enable interaction by persons with speech impairments, yet access to these devices is limited. In 2019, the Government of Canada introduced \\\"The Accessible Canada Act\\\" to reduce barriers. Availability of information online about AAC systems can reduce barriers to many Canadians who have difficulty attending in-person appointments. While Ontario's Assistive Device Program has been reviewed, other government-funded and charitable organizations across Canada have not been assessed for readability and accessibility. This research aims to evaluate the websites of organizations across Canada that provide AAC technology access, either through equipment loans or financial assistance programs. Forty-three eligible organizations were identified. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines scores (A, AA, and AAA) and four readability scores (Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, and age range) for each website were determined. Thirteen of 43 sites scored below the recommended standard of 75 for WCAG score, and Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease score indicated 86% were more difficult to read than standard recommendations for web content. To enhance equity in AAC device access, online availability of information and forms of government programs and charitable organizations must be easily understood and barrier-free.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2499621\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2499621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

替代和增强通信(AAC)系统使有语言障碍的人能够进行互动,但使用这些设备的机会有限。2019年,加拿大政府推出了《无障碍加拿大法》,以减少障碍。关于AAC系统的在线信息的可用性可以减少许多难以亲自参加预约的加拿大人的障碍。虽然安大略省的辅助设备计划已被审查,但加拿大其他政府资助和慈善组织的可读性和可访问性尚未得到评估。本研究旨在评估加拿大各地通过设备贷款或财政援助计划提供AAC技术访问的组织网站。确定了43个符合条件的组织。确定了每个网站的Web Content Accessibility Guidelines评分(A, AA和AAA)和四个可读性评分(Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog和age range)。43个网站中有13个网站的得分低于WCAG推荐的75分标准,Flesch Kincaid阅读难度评分显示,86%的网站比标准推荐的网站内容更难阅读。为了提高AAC设备使用的公平性,网上信息的可用性以及政府项目和慈善组织的形式必须易于理解和无障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Website navigation: Access to online resources to determine eligibility for augmentative & alternative communication (AAC) technology in Canada.

Alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) systems enable interaction by persons with speech impairments, yet access to these devices is limited. In 2019, the Government of Canada introduced "The Accessible Canada Act" to reduce barriers. Availability of information online about AAC systems can reduce barriers to many Canadians who have difficulty attending in-person appointments. While Ontario's Assistive Device Program has been reviewed, other government-funded and charitable organizations across Canada have not been assessed for readability and accessibility. This research aims to evaluate the websites of organizations across Canada that provide AAC technology access, either through equipment loans or financial assistance programs. Forty-three eligible organizations were identified. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines scores (A, AA, and AAA) and four readability scores (Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog, and age range) for each website were determined. Thirteen of 43 sites scored below the recommended standard of 75 for WCAG score, and Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease score indicated 86% were more difficult to read than standard recommendations for web content. To enhance equity in AAC device access, online availability of information and forms of government programs and charitable organizations must be easily understood and barrier-free.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信