通过课程语义揭示教学质量:gpt辅助的成绩单分析。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Richard Göllner, Rebecca Lazarides, Philipp Stark
{"title":"通过课程语义揭示教学质量:gpt辅助的成绩单分析。","authors":"Richard Göllner, Rebecca Lazarides, Philipp Stark","doi":"10.1111/bjep.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing conceptions of teaching quality assume that classroom interactions serve as the foundation for effective teaching. The resulting data necessitates analytical approaches capable of extracting the semantics of these interactions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigates whether and to what extent lesson semantics provide insights into teaching quality (i.e., cognitive engagement, encouragement and warmth, multiple approaches, and the nature of discourse). To achieve this, GPT-4 was applied as a tool for analysing lesson transcripts.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>The study is based on data from the TALIS Video study, which included N = 50 teachers delivering two consecutive mathematics lessons in 9th grade. Teaching quality was annotated by trained observers across multiple dimensions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The analysis involved embedding segmented lesson transcripts to examine their semantic characteristics and associations with human annotations of teaching quality. Additionally, we applied content-informed prompting to evaluate the interpretability of semantic characteristics for the considered dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 identified five distinct semantic representations of transcripts, varying at both the teacher and lesson levels. These representations were related to teaching quality, accounting for up to 20% of variance in teaching quality annotations. Content-informed prompting aligned lesson segments more closely with semantic representations, supporting their interpretability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that lesson semantics serve as indicators of teaching quality, offering a promising approach to understanding effective classroom learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revealing teaching quality through lesson semantics: A GPT-assisted analysis of transcripts.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Göllner, Rebecca Lazarides, Philipp Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjep.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing conceptions of teaching quality assume that classroom interactions serve as the foundation for effective teaching. The resulting data necessitates analytical approaches capable of extracting the semantics of these interactions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigates whether and to what extent lesson semantics provide insights into teaching quality (i.e., cognitive engagement, encouragement and warmth, multiple approaches, and the nature of discourse). To achieve this, GPT-4 was applied as a tool for analysing lesson transcripts.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>The study is based on data from the TALIS Video study, which included N = 50 teachers delivering two consecutive mathematics lessons in 9th grade. Teaching quality was annotated by trained observers across multiple dimensions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The analysis involved embedding segmented lesson transcripts to examine their semantic characteristics and associations with human annotations of teaching quality. Additionally, we applied content-informed prompting to evaluate the interpretability of semantic characteristics for the considered dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4 identified five distinct semantic representations of transcripts, varying at both the teacher and lesson levels. These representations were related to teaching quality, accounting for up to 20% of variance in teaching quality annotations. Content-informed prompting aligned lesson segments more closely with semantic representations, supporting their interpretability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that lesson semantics serve as indicators of teaching quality, offering a promising approach to understanding effective classroom learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.70001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的教学质量观念认为课堂互动是有效教学的基础。结果数据需要能够提取这些交互语义的分析方法。目的:本研究探讨课程语义是否以及在多大程度上对教学质量(即认知参与、鼓励和温暖、多种方法和话语性质)提供见解。为了实现这一目标,GPT-4被用作分析课程成绩单的工具。样本:该研究基于TALIS视频研究的数据,其中包括N = 50名9年级连续两节数学课的教师。由训练有素的观察员从多个维度对教学质量进行注释。方法:采用嵌入分段式课文文本的分析方法,考察其语义特征及其与教学质量人工标注的关联。此外,我们应用内容通知提示来评估所考虑维度的语义特征的可解释性。结果:GPT-4确定了五种不同的文本语义表示,在教师和课程水平上都有所不同。这些表示与教学质量有关,占教学质量注释方差的20%。内容通知提示将课程片段与语义表示更紧密地对齐,支持其可解释性。结论:研究结果表明,课堂语义学可以作为教学质量的指标,为理解有效的课堂学习提供了一种有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revealing teaching quality through lesson semantics: A GPT-assisted analysis of transcripts.

Background: Existing conceptions of teaching quality assume that classroom interactions serve as the foundation for effective teaching. The resulting data necessitates analytical approaches capable of extracting the semantics of these interactions.

Aim: This study investigates whether and to what extent lesson semantics provide insights into teaching quality (i.e., cognitive engagement, encouragement and warmth, multiple approaches, and the nature of discourse). To achieve this, GPT-4 was applied as a tool for analysing lesson transcripts.

Sample: The study is based on data from the TALIS Video study, which included N = 50 teachers delivering two consecutive mathematics lessons in 9th grade. Teaching quality was annotated by trained observers across multiple dimensions.

Method: The analysis involved embedding segmented lesson transcripts to examine their semantic characteristics and associations with human annotations of teaching quality. Additionally, we applied content-informed prompting to evaluate the interpretability of semantic characteristics for the considered dimensions.

Results: GPT-4 identified five distinct semantic representations of transcripts, varying at both the teacher and lesson levels. These representations were related to teaching quality, accounting for up to 20% of variance in teaching quality annotations. Content-informed prompting aligned lesson segments more closely with semantic representations, supporting their interpretability.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that lesson semantics serve as indicators of teaching quality, offering a promising approach to understanding effective classroom learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信