混合物理治疗教育中学习策略与学生成功的预测关系探讨。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Jessica Feda, Kyle Adams, Laura Wenger, Jodi L Young, Tricia Catalino, Rodney Sturdivant, Kendra Gagnon
{"title":"混合物理治疗教育中学习策略与学生成功的预测关系探讨。","authors":"Jessica Feda, Kyle Adams, Laura Wenger, Jodi L Young, Tricia Catalino, Rodney Sturdivant, Kendra Gagnon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs delivered in a hybrid format, with a significant amount of learning occurring online. There is a need to understand student characteristics that predict success in this format. The purpose of this study was to identify learning and study strategies that predict DPT program cumulative grade point average (cGPA) and performance on the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) in a hybrid DPT program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 107 students enrolled in a hybrid DPT program. Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) scores, demographic data, NPTE results, and cGPA were collected. Variables were analyzed using regression analyses to predict NPTE scores and cGPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three LASSI scales including test strategies, selecting main ideas, and anxiety explained 9.8% of the variance in cGPA. Five LASSI scales including self-testing, selecting main ideas, anxiety, concentration, and test strategies explained 18.3% of the variance in NPTE scores. These analyses yielded two primary scale predictors of academic success for hybrid DPT students: self-testing and test strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to explore the predictive value of self-regulated learning on NPTE results and cGPA within hybrid DPT education. Self-regulated learning strategies are modifiable and may be used prospectively as targets for intervention to improve NPTE performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"54 2","pages":"e175-e181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of Predictive Relationships Between Learning and Study Strategies and Student Success in Hybrid Physical Therapy Education.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Feda, Kyle Adams, Laura Wenger, Jodi L Young, Tricia Catalino, Rodney Sturdivant, Kendra Gagnon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs delivered in a hybrid format, with a significant amount of learning occurring online. There is a need to understand student characteristics that predict success in this format. The purpose of this study was to identify learning and study strategies that predict DPT program cumulative grade point average (cGPA) and performance on the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) in a hybrid DPT program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 107 students enrolled in a hybrid DPT program. Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) scores, demographic data, NPTE results, and cGPA were collected. Variables were analyzed using regression analyses to predict NPTE scores and cGPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three LASSI scales including test strategies, selecting main ideas, and anxiety explained 9.8% of the variance in cGPA. Five LASSI scales including self-testing, selecting main ideas, anxiety, concentration, and test strategies explained 18.3% of the variance in NPTE scores. These analyses yielded two primary scale predictors of academic success for hybrid DPT students: self-testing and test strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to explore the predictive value of self-regulated learning on NPTE results and cGPA within hybrid DPT education. Self-regulated learning strategies are modifiable and may be used prospectively as targets for intervention to improve NPTE performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"54 2\",\"pages\":\"e175-e181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,以混合形式提供的物理治疗博士(DPT)课程数量有所增加,其中大量学习发生在网上。有必要了解学生的特点,预测这种形式的成功。本研究的目的是确定学习和学习策略,以预测混合DPT项目中DPT项目累积平均成绩(cGPA)和国家物理治疗考试(NPTE)的表现。方法:参与者包括107名参加混合DPT计划的学生。收集学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)得分、人口统计数据、NPTE结果和cGPA。变量分析采用回归分析预测NPTE分数和cGPA。结果:考试策略、主旨选择和焦虑三个LASSI量表解释了9.8%的cGPA方差。五个LASSI量表,包括自我测试、选择主要思想、焦虑、注意力集中和测试策略,解释了NPTE分数18.3%的方差。这些分析得出了混合DPT学生学业成功的两个主要量表预测因子:自我测试和测试策略。结论:本研究首次探讨了自主学习对混合DPT教育中NPTE成绩和cGPA的预测价值。自我调节学习策略是可修改的,可以作为干预目标,以提高NPTE绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of Predictive Relationships Between Learning and Study Strategies and Student Success in Hybrid Physical Therapy Education.

Purpose: In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs delivered in a hybrid format, with a significant amount of learning occurring online. There is a need to understand student characteristics that predict success in this format. The purpose of this study was to identify learning and study strategies that predict DPT program cumulative grade point average (cGPA) and performance on the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) in a hybrid DPT program.

Methods: Participants included 107 students enrolled in a hybrid DPT program. Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) scores, demographic data, NPTE results, and cGPA were collected. Variables were analyzed using regression analyses to predict NPTE scores and cGPA.

Results: Three LASSI scales including test strategies, selecting main ideas, and anxiety explained 9.8% of the variance in cGPA. Five LASSI scales including self-testing, selecting main ideas, anxiety, concentration, and test strategies explained 18.3% of the variance in NPTE scores. These analyses yielded two primary scale predictors of academic success for hybrid DPT students: self-testing and test strategies.

Conclusions: This is the first study to explore the predictive value of self-regulated learning on NPTE results and cGPA within hybrid DPT education. Self-regulated learning strategies are modifiable and may be used prospectively as targets for intervention to improve NPTE performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信