评估寿命终止处理对可重复使用医疗器械的影响。

Q4 Medicine
Alpa N Patel, Daniel Olsen
{"title":"评估寿命终止处理对可重复使用医疗器械的影响。","authors":"Alpa N Patel, Daniel Olsen","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-59.1.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>End-of-life (EOL) testing requirements for reusable medical devices continue to cause confusion in the medical device industry. Regulatory expectations from U.S. and European Union authorities differ, particularly regarding whether manufacturers must conduct EOL testing or if a cautionary statement in the instructions for use is sufficient. ISO 10993-1:2021 mandates biological safety evaluations for the maximum validated number of processing cycles. Similarly, ISO 17664-1:2021, regulation (EU) 2017/745, and Food and Drug Administration guidance require manufacturers to determine whether repeated processing causes degradation that could limit a device's usable life. However, these documents provide limited direction on how to perform such assessments, leaving a gap in standardized methodology. This study aimed to develop a practical and reproducible protocol for EOL evaluation, reflecting real-world clinical use and manufacturer-recommended processing instructions. The primary objective was to assess whether biological or chemical residues remained on devices after repeated use and processing. A theoretical estimate of 100 use and processing cycles was used, representing a reasonable service life based on routine clinical conditions. A simulated 100-cycle protocol, including soiling, cleaning, and sterilization testing, revealed negligible to nondetectable residual contaminants on both surrogate coupons and actual devices. These results suggest that even under worst-case conditions, devices can be processed effectively without substantial accumulation of contaminants, supporting the selected EOL threshold. This approach offers a reproducible framework for manufacturers to evaluate and validate EOL claims, addressing a critical regulatory and practical challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":"59 1","pages":"128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12154862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Impact of End-of-Life Processing on Reusable Medical Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Alpa N Patel, Daniel Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.2345/0899-8205-59.1.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>End-of-life (EOL) testing requirements for reusable medical devices continue to cause confusion in the medical device industry. Regulatory expectations from U.S. and European Union authorities differ, particularly regarding whether manufacturers must conduct EOL testing or if a cautionary statement in the instructions for use is sufficient. ISO 10993-1:2021 mandates biological safety evaluations for the maximum validated number of processing cycles. Similarly, ISO 17664-1:2021, regulation (EU) 2017/745, and Food and Drug Administration guidance require manufacturers to determine whether repeated processing causes degradation that could limit a device's usable life. However, these documents provide limited direction on how to perform such assessments, leaving a gap in standardized methodology. This study aimed to develop a practical and reproducible protocol for EOL evaluation, reflecting real-world clinical use and manufacturer-recommended processing instructions. The primary objective was to assess whether biological or chemical residues remained on devices after repeated use and processing. A theoretical estimate of 100 use and processing cycles was used, representing a reasonable service life based on routine clinical conditions. A simulated 100-cycle protocol, including soiling, cleaning, and sterilization testing, revealed negligible to nondetectable residual contaminants on both surrogate coupons and actual devices. These results suggest that even under worst-case conditions, devices can be processed effectively without substantial accumulation of contaminants, supporting the selected EOL threshold. This approach offers a reproducible framework for manufacturers to evaluate and validate EOL claims, addressing a critical regulatory and practical challenge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"128-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12154862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-59.1.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-59.1.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可重复使用医疗设备的寿命终止(EOL)测试要求继续在医疗设备行业造成混乱。美国和欧盟当局的监管期望不同,特别是关于制造商是否必须进行EOL测试,或者在使用说明中是否有警告声明是足够的。ISO 10993-1:2021要求对最大验证的处理周期进行生物安全评估。类似地,ISO 17664-1:2021、法规(EU) 2017/745和食品药品监督管理局指南要求制造商确定重复加工是否会导致退化,从而限制器械的使用寿命。然而,这些文件对如何进行这种评估提供了有限的指导,在标准化方法上留下了空白。本研究旨在开发一种实用且可重复的EOL评估方案,以反映实际临床使用和制造商推荐的处理说明。主要目的是评估重复使用和加工后装置上是否残留生物或化学残留物。使用了100个使用和处理周期的理论估计,代表了基于常规临床条件的合理使用寿命。一个模拟的100循环方案,包括污染,清洁和灭菌测试,显示在替代优惠券和实际设备上可以忽略不计到不可检测的残留污染物。这些结果表明,即使在最坏的情况下,设备也可以在没有大量污染物积累的情况下进行有效处理,从而支持所选的EOL阈值。该方法为制造商评估和验证EOL声明提供了一个可复制的框架,解决了关键的监管和实践挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Impact of End-of-Life Processing on Reusable Medical Devices.

End-of-life (EOL) testing requirements for reusable medical devices continue to cause confusion in the medical device industry. Regulatory expectations from U.S. and European Union authorities differ, particularly regarding whether manufacturers must conduct EOL testing or if a cautionary statement in the instructions for use is sufficient. ISO 10993-1:2021 mandates biological safety evaluations for the maximum validated number of processing cycles. Similarly, ISO 17664-1:2021, regulation (EU) 2017/745, and Food and Drug Administration guidance require manufacturers to determine whether repeated processing causes degradation that could limit a device's usable life. However, these documents provide limited direction on how to perform such assessments, leaving a gap in standardized methodology. This study aimed to develop a practical and reproducible protocol for EOL evaluation, reflecting real-world clinical use and manufacturer-recommended processing instructions. The primary objective was to assess whether biological or chemical residues remained on devices after repeated use and processing. A theoretical estimate of 100 use and processing cycles was used, representing a reasonable service life based on routine clinical conditions. A simulated 100-cycle protocol, including soiling, cleaning, and sterilization testing, revealed negligible to nondetectable residual contaminants on both surrogate coupons and actual devices. These results suggest that even under worst-case conditions, devices can be processed effectively without substantial accumulation of contaminants, supporting the selected EOL threshold. This approach offers a reproducible framework for manufacturers to evaluate and validate EOL claims, addressing a critical regulatory and practical challenge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信