评估美国外科医师学会认证项目的初始现场访问通过率。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Brett A Johnson, Geoffrey G Hobika, Erica McNamara, Clifford Y Ko
{"title":"评估美国外科医师学会认证项目的初始现场访问通过率。","authors":"Brett A Johnson, Geoffrey G Hobika, Erica McNamara, Clifford Y Ko","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) accreditation programs establish evidence-based, consensus-driven standards to improve surgical quality. While the criteria are publicly available for self-assessment, limited data exist on initial pass rates and the effectiveness of remediation after a failed site visit. This study evaluates outcomes of initial ACS accreditation visits to determine whether accreditation primarily validates hospitals already meeting standards or serves as a driver for systemic quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized the ACS Quality Database to identify hospitals undergoing first-time comprehensive accreditation visits from 2017-2023 across seven ACS Quality Programs. The primary outcome was the initial accreditation pass rate; secondary outcomes included re-evaluation, domain-level, and standard-level pass rates. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with first-attempt success. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of prior system-level accreditation experience in multi-hospital systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 833 initial site visits, 61% of hospitals achieved accreditation on their first attempt. Pass rates varied substantially by program, ranging from 31% to 86%. Among hospitals that failed initially, 94% of hospitals that pursued re-evaluation achieved accreditation. The most common areas of deficiency involved the quality domains \"Personnel and Services Resources\" and \"Patient Care: Expectations and Protocols.\" In a subgroup analysis, hospitals in systems with prior accreditation experience had higher first-attempt pass rates (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09-2.65; P=0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate that many hospitals pursuing accreditation initially face challenges in meeting core patient safety and quality standards. However, through remediation, most ultimately achieve accreditation, underscoring accreditation's role as a driver for systemic improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Initial Site Visit Pass Rate Across American College of Surgeons Accreditation Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Brett A Johnson, Geoffrey G Hobika, Erica McNamara, Clifford Y Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American College of Surgeons (ACS) accreditation programs establish evidence-based, consensus-driven standards to improve surgical quality. While the criteria are publicly available for self-assessment, limited data exist on initial pass rates and the effectiveness of remediation after a failed site visit. This study evaluates outcomes of initial ACS accreditation visits to determine whether accreditation primarily validates hospitals already meeting standards or serves as a driver for systemic quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized the ACS Quality Database to identify hospitals undergoing first-time comprehensive accreditation visits from 2017-2023 across seven ACS Quality Programs. The primary outcome was the initial accreditation pass rate; secondary outcomes included re-evaluation, domain-level, and standard-level pass rates. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with first-attempt success. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of prior system-level accreditation experience in multi-hospital systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 833 initial site visits, 61% of hospitals achieved accreditation on their first attempt. Pass rates varied substantially by program, ranging from 31% to 86%. Among hospitals that failed initially, 94% of hospitals that pursued re-evaluation achieved accreditation. The most common areas of deficiency involved the quality domains \\\"Personnel and Services Resources\\\" and \\\"Patient Care: Expectations and Protocols.\\\" In a subgroup analysis, hospitals in systems with prior accreditation experience had higher first-attempt pass rates (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09-2.65; P=0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate that many hospitals pursuing accreditation initially face challenges in meeting core patient safety and quality standards. However, through remediation, most ultimately achieve accreditation, underscoring accreditation's role as a driver for systemic improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001441\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国外科医师学会(American College of Surgeons, ACS)的认证项目建立了基于证据、共识驱动的标准,以提高手术质量。虽然自我评估的标准是公开的,但关于初始通过率和失败的实地考察后补救效果的数据有限。本研究评估了ACS首次认证访问的结果,以确定认证是否主要验证了已经达到标准的医院,还是作为系统质量改进的驱动因素。研究设计:本回顾性队列研究利用ACS质量数据库来确定2017-2023年7个ACS质量项目中首次接受全面认证访问的医院。主要结果是最初的认证合格率;次要结局包括重新评估、领域水平和标准水平通过率。多变量逻辑回归确定了与首次尝试成功相关的因素。分组分析评估了多医院系统中先前系统级认证经验的效果。结果:在833次初步实地考察中,61%的医院在第一次尝试中获得了认证。通过率因课程而异,从31%到86%不等。在最初失败的医院中,94%的医院进行了重新评估,获得了认证。最常见的不足领域涉及“人员和服务资源”和“患者护理:期望和协议”的质量领域。在亚组分析中,具有先前认证经验的系统中的医院有更高的首次尝试通过率(OR: 1.69;95% ci: 1.09-2.65;P = 0.021)。结论:研究结果表明,许多寻求认证的医院最初在满足核心患者安全和质量标准方面面临挑战。然而,通过补救,大多数最终实现了认证,强调了认证作为系统改进的驱动因素的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Initial Site Visit Pass Rate Across American College of Surgeons Accreditation Programs.

Background: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) accreditation programs establish evidence-based, consensus-driven standards to improve surgical quality. While the criteria are publicly available for self-assessment, limited data exist on initial pass rates and the effectiveness of remediation after a failed site visit. This study evaluates outcomes of initial ACS accreditation visits to determine whether accreditation primarily validates hospitals already meeting standards or serves as a driver for systemic quality improvement.

Study design: This retrospective cohort study utilized the ACS Quality Database to identify hospitals undergoing first-time comprehensive accreditation visits from 2017-2023 across seven ACS Quality Programs. The primary outcome was the initial accreditation pass rate; secondary outcomes included re-evaluation, domain-level, and standard-level pass rates. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with first-attempt success. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of prior system-level accreditation experience in multi-hospital systems.

Results: Of 833 initial site visits, 61% of hospitals achieved accreditation on their first attempt. Pass rates varied substantially by program, ranging from 31% to 86%. Among hospitals that failed initially, 94% of hospitals that pursued re-evaluation achieved accreditation. The most common areas of deficiency involved the quality domains "Personnel and Services Resources" and "Patient Care: Expectations and Protocols." In a subgroup analysis, hospitals in systems with prior accreditation experience had higher first-attempt pass rates (OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.09-2.65; P=0.021).

Conclusion: Findings demonstrate that many hospitals pursuing accreditation initially face challenges in meeting core patient safety and quality standards. However, through remediation, most ultimately achieve accreditation, underscoring accreditation's role as a driver for systemic improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信