Chelsea Anderson, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Jennifer E Mersereau, Katie Cameron, Steven D Spandorfer, Valerie L Baker, Sara Mitra, Jianwen Cai, Barbara Luke, Hazel B Nichols
{"title":"癌症后的生育能力保存和体外受精(IVF)成功率。","authors":"Chelsea Anderson, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Jennifer E Mersereau, Katie Cameron, Steven D Spandorfer, Valerie L Baker, Sara Mitra, Jianwen Cai, Barbara Luke, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures is critical for informed decision-making before and after cancer treatment. We compared IVF outcomes between women with and without cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from a national IVF database, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, linked to statewide cancer registries and birth certificates in 9 states, we identified women who initiated IVF following a cancer diagnosis. Fertility preservation was defined as oocyte retrieval ≤90 days after cancer diagnosis, and IVF after cancer treatment as retrieval >90 days post-diagnosis. Number of oocytes retrieved and conception and livebirth rates were compared between these groups and a comparison group of women without cancer in couples with male factor infertility only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to retrievals for male factor infertility only (N = 81,370), the number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different for women who underwent retrieval for fertility preservation (N = 2,941) but was significantly lower for women who underwent retrievals after cancer treatment (N = 2,479) (mean difference=-2.99; 95% CI: -3.40-2.59). Rate of conception as a function of transfer attempts and likelihood of livebirth after conception also did not significantly differ for fertility preservation (N = 291) compared to male factor infertility only (N = 34,410). Women with IVF after cancer treatment (N = 672) had a lower rate of conception (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.61-0.79), but a similar overall likelihood of a livebirth after conception, relative to the group with male factor infertility only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IVF outcomes may be maximized when ovarian retrieval is initiated before cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fertility preservation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates after cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Anderson, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Jennifer E Mersereau, Katie Cameron, Steven D Spandorfer, Valerie L Baker, Sara Mitra, Jianwen Cai, Barbara Luke, Hazel B Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures is critical for informed decision-making before and after cancer treatment. We compared IVF outcomes between women with and without cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from a national IVF database, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, linked to statewide cancer registries and birth certificates in 9 states, we identified women who initiated IVF following a cancer diagnosis. Fertility preservation was defined as oocyte retrieval ≤90 days after cancer diagnosis, and IVF after cancer treatment as retrieval >90 days post-diagnosis. Number of oocytes retrieved and conception and livebirth rates were compared between these groups and a comparison group of women without cancer in couples with male factor infertility only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to retrievals for male factor infertility only (N = 81,370), the number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different for women who underwent retrieval for fertility preservation (N = 2,941) but was significantly lower for women who underwent retrievals after cancer treatment (N = 2,479) (mean difference=-2.99; 95% CI: -3.40-2.59). Rate of conception as a function of transfer attempts and likelihood of livebirth after conception also did not significantly differ for fertility preservation (N = 291) compared to male factor infertility only (N = 34,410). Women with IVF after cancer treatment (N = 672) had a lower rate of conception (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.61-0.79), but a similar overall likelihood of a livebirth after conception, relative to the group with male factor infertility only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IVF outcomes may be maximized when ovarian retrieval is initiated before cancer treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fertility preservation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates after cancer.
Background: Evidence of the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures is critical for informed decision-making before and after cancer treatment. We compared IVF outcomes between women with and without cancer.
Methods: Using data from a national IVF database, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, linked to statewide cancer registries and birth certificates in 9 states, we identified women who initiated IVF following a cancer diagnosis. Fertility preservation was defined as oocyte retrieval ≤90 days after cancer diagnosis, and IVF after cancer treatment as retrieval >90 days post-diagnosis. Number of oocytes retrieved and conception and livebirth rates were compared between these groups and a comparison group of women without cancer in couples with male factor infertility only.
Results: Compared to retrievals for male factor infertility only (N = 81,370), the number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different for women who underwent retrieval for fertility preservation (N = 2,941) but was significantly lower for women who underwent retrievals after cancer treatment (N = 2,479) (mean difference=-2.99; 95% CI: -3.40-2.59). Rate of conception as a function of transfer attempts and likelihood of livebirth after conception also did not significantly differ for fertility preservation (N = 291) compared to male factor infertility only (N = 34,410). Women with IVF after cancer treatment (N = 672) had a lower rate of conception (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.61-0.79), but a similar overall likelihood of a livebirth after conception, relative to the group with male factor infertility only.
Conclusion: IVF outcomes may be maximized when ovarian retrieval is initiated before cancer treatment.