在现实世界中,对弱势群体公平优先接种疫苗是否可行?以比利时为例。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elias Vermeiren, Charlotte Scheerens, Veerle Stouten, John Crombez, Jan De Maeseneer, Joris A F van Loenhout
{"title":"在现实世界中,对弱势群体公平优先接种疫苗是否可行?以比利时为例。","authors":"Elias Vermeiren, Charlotte Scheerens, Veerle Stouten, John Crombez, Jan De Maeseneer, Joris A F van Loenhout","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Belgium has implemented a strategy to prioritize vaccination at population level during the COVID-19 pandemic, targeting individuals with pre-existing health conditions at increased risk of severe COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate whether prioritized groups were vaccinated sooner, and which socio-demographic and -economic characteristics were related to the speed of vaccine uptake. We calculated the time to vaccination between the start of the prioritization (1 April 2021) and receiving a first COVID-19 vaccine dose, using this interval as a proxy for evaluating the strategy's early impact. A multivariate regression model, incorporating priority status, age, sex, region of residence, income, and migration background, described the natural logarithm of this time gap. The sample included 4 472 873 individuals vaccinated between 1 April and 31 December 2021, of which 26.4% were prioritized. The results show a 34.6 days earlier vaccination for prioritized individuals versus non-prioritized ones. The time difference between the prioritized and non-prioritized groups was larger in the younger age groups compared to the older age groups (28.2 days versus 19.3 days). Based on the multivariate model estimates, being prioritized [βpriority = -0.37, 95% CI (-0.38; -0.36)], older age [β55-64 = -0.57, 95% CI(-0.58; -0.56)], residency in Brussels or Wallonia [βBrussels = -0.18, 95%CI (-0.20; -0.16); βWallonia = -0.18, 95% CI (-0.19; -0.17)], having a high income [βhigh income = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.12; -0.10)], being a Belgian national (βbelgian = reference), having had a recent prior infection (βno prior infection = reference) and being female (βfemale = reference) are associated with a shorter time to vaccination. Developing and implementing a prioritization vaccination strategy accelerated vaccination for the high-risk population with health conditions, demonstrating its feasibility in promoting equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is equitable priority vaccination of vulnerable people feasible in a real-world context? The case of Belgium.\",\"authors\":\"Elias Vermeiren, Charlotte Scheerens, Veerle Stouten, John Crombez, Jan De Maeseneer, Joris A F van Loenhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Belgium has implemented a strategy to prioritize vaccination at population level during the COVID-19 pandemic, targeting individuals with pre-existing health conditions at increased risk of severe COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate whether prioritized groups were vaccinated sooner, and which socio-demographic and -economic characteristics were related to the speed of vaccine uptake. We calculated the time to vaccination between the start of the prioritization (1 April 2021) and receiving a first COVID-19 vaccine dose, using this interval as a proxy for evaluating the strategy's early impact. A multivariate regression model, incorporating priority status, age, sex, region of residence, income, and migration background, described the natural logarithm of this time gap. The sample included 4 472 873 individuals vaccinated between 1 April and 31 December 2021, of which 26.4% were prioritized. The results show a 34.6 days earlier vaccination for prioritized individuals versus non-prioritized ones. The time difference between the prioritized and non-prioritized groups was larger in the younger age groups compared to the older age groups (28.2 days versus 19.3 days). Based on the multivariate model estimates, being prioritized [βpriority = -0.37, 95% CI (-0.38; -0.36)], older age [β55-64 = -0.57, 95% CI(-0.58; -0.56)], residency in Brussels or Wallonia [βBrussels = -0.18, 95%CI (-0.20; -0.16); βWallonia = -0.18, 95% CI (-0.19; -0.17)], having a high income [βhigh income = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.12; -0.10)], being a Belgian national (βbelgian = reference), having had a recent prior infection (βno prior infection = reference) and being female (βfemale = reference) are associated with a shorter time to vaccination. Developing and implementing a prioritization vaccination strategy accelerated vaccination for the high-risk population with health conditions, demonstrating its feasibility in promoting equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比利时实施了一项战略,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间优先在人群层面进行疫苗接种,针对那些已有健康状况、感染严重COVID-19风险增加的人。我们的目的是评估优先人群是否更早接种疫苗,以及哪些社会人口统计学和经济特征与疫苗接种速度有关。我们计算了从开始确定优先事项(2021年4月1日)到接种第一剂COVID-19疫苗之间的疫苗接种时间,并使用这一间隔作为评估该战略早期影响的指标。一个多元回归模型,包括优先地位,年龄,性别,居住地区,收入和移民背景,描述了这个时间差距的自然对数。样本包括在2021年4月1日至12月31日期间接种疫苗的4 472 873人,其中26.4%得到优先接种。结果显示,优先接种疫苗的人比非优先接种疫苗的人早34.6天接种疫苗。优先组和非优先组之间的时间差在较年轻的年龄组比较年长的年龄组更大(28.2天对19.3天)。根据多变量模型估计,被优先考虑[βpriority = -0.37, 95% CI (-0.38;-0.36)],老年[β55 - 64 = -0.57,95% CI (-0.58;-0.56)],居住在布鲁塞尔或瓦隆尼亚[β布鲁塞尔= -0.18,95%CI (-0.20;-0.16);βWallonia = -0.18, 95% CI (-0.19;-0.17)],收入高[β高收入= -0.11,95% CI (-0.12;-0.10)]、比利时国民(β比利时人=参照)、近期既往感染(β无既往感染=参照)和女性(β女性=参照)与接种疫苗时间较短相关。制定和实施优先接种战略加快了对有健康状况的高危人群的疫苗接种,证明了其在促进公平获得COVID-19疫苗方面的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is equitable priority vaccination of vulnerable people feasible in a real-world context? The case of Belgium.

Belgium has implemented a strategy to prioritize vaccination at population level during the COVID-19 pandemic, targeting individuals with pre-existing health conditions at increased risk of severe COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate whether prioritized groups were vaccinated sooner, and which socio-demographic and -economic characteristics were related to the speed of vaccine uptake. We calculated the time to vaccination between the start of the prioritization (1 April 2021) and receiving a first COVID-19 vaccine dose, using this interval as a proxy for evaluating the strategy's early impact. A multivariate regression model, incorporating priority status, age, sex, region of residence, income, and migration background, described the natural logarithm of this time gap. The sample included 4 472 873 individuals vaccinated between 1 April and 31 December 2021, of which 26.4% were prioritized. The results show a 34.6 days earlier vaccination for prioritized individuals versus non-prioritized ones. The time difference between the prioritized and non-prioritized groups was larger in the younger age groups compared to the older age groups (28.2 days versus 19.3 days). Based on the multivariate model estimates, being prioritized [βpriority = -0.37, 95% CI (-0.38; -0.36)], older age [β55-64 = -0.57, 95% CI(-0.58; -0.56)], residency in Brussels or Wallonia [βBrussels = -0.18, 95%CI (-0.20; -0.16); βWallonia = -0.18, 95% CI (-0.19; -0.17)], having a high income [βhigh income = -0.11, 95% CI (-0.12; -0.10)], being a Belgian national (βbelgian = reference), having had a recent prior infection (βno prior infection = reference) and being female (βfemale = reference) are associated with a shorter time to vaccination. Developing and implementing a prioritization vaccination strategy accelerated vaccination for the high-risk population with health conditions, demonstrating its feasibility in promoting equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信