中国“双降”政策对小学生主观幸福感和学业成绩的影响

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jinyan Zhou , Aiai Fan
{"title":"中国“双降”政策对小学生主观幸福感和学业成绩的影响","authors":"Jinyan Zhou ,&nbsp;Aiai Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's \"Double Reduction\" policy, launched in 2021, seeks to reduce academic pressure on students in compulsory schooling. Using a two-wave logitudinal survey data (Sep 2021 to Jun 2023) from 1402 fourth- to fifth-grade students in a Beijing district and applying a first-difference approach with Lasso control for causal estimation, this study examines how three key policy initiatives —reducing homework, regulating private training institutions, and requiring schools to provide after-school services—impact students' subjective well-being and academic achievement. Our estimations find that reducing homework time and providing school-based after-school services improve students’ subjective well-being without compromising their academic performance. In contrast, while regulating private tutoring institutions increases subjective well-being, it decreases academic achievement among low-SES students. This research highlights the complex, and potentially inequitable consequences arising from the \"Double Reduction\" policy, emphasizing the critical trade-off for future policy adjustments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 103321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of China's “Double Reduction” policy on primary school students' subjective well-being and academic achievement\",\"authors\":\"Jinyan Zhou ,&nbsp;Aiai Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China's \\\"Double Reduction\\\" policy, launched in 2021, seeks to reduce academic pressure on students in compulsory schooling. Using a two-wave logitudinal survey data (Sep 2021 to Jun 2023) from 1402 fourth- to fifth-grade students in a Beijing district and applying a first-difference approach with Lasso control for causal estimation, this study examines how three key policy initiatives —reducing homework, regulating private training institutions, and requiring schools to provide after-school services—impact students' subjective well-being and academic achievement. Our estimations find that reducing homework time and providing school-based after-school services improve students’ subjective well-being without compromising their academic performance. In contrast, while regulating private tutoring institutions increases subjective well-being, it decreases academic achievement among low-SES students. This research highlights the complex, and potentially inequitable consequences arising from the \\\"Double Reduction\\\" policy, emphasizing the critical trade-off for future policy adjustments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国于2021年启动的“双降”政策,旨在减轻义务教育阶段学生的学业压力。本研究利用2021年9月至2023年6月对北京某区1402名四至五年级学生的两波逻辑调查数据,采用Lasso控制的一差法进行因果估计,研究了减少家庭作业、规范私立培训机构和要求学校提供课后服务这三个关键政策举措对学生主观幸福感和学业成绩的影响。我们的估计发现,减少家庭作业时间和提供校本课后服务可以提高学生的主观幸福感,而不会影响他们的学习成绩。相反,虽然对私人辅导机构的监管提高了主观幸福感,但却降低了低经济地位学生的学习成绩。本研究强调了“双重削减”政策所产生的复杂和潜在的不公平后果,强调了未来政策调整的关键权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of China's “Double Reduction” policy on primary school students' subjective well-being and academic achievement
China's "Double Reduction" policy, launched in 2021, seeks to reduce academic pressure on students in compulsory schooling. Using a two-wave logitudinal survey data (Sep 2021 to Jun 2023) from 1402 fourth- to fifth-grade students in a Beijing district and applying a first-difference approach with Lasso control for causal estimation, this study examines how three key policy initiatives —reducing homework, regulating private training institutions, and requiring schools to provide after-school services—impact students' subjective well-being and academic achievement. Our estimations find that reducing homework time and providing school-based after-school services improve students’ subjective well-being without compromising their academic performance. In contrast, while regulating private tutoring institutions increases subjective well-being, it decreases academic achievement among low-SES students. This research highlights the complex, and potentially inequitable consequences arising from the "Double Reduction" policy, emphasizing the critical trade-off for future policy adjustments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信