Zhaoyang Wang , Sheng Fang , Li Yang , Xinpeng Li , Yixue Chen
{"title":"AP1000核电厂非均质地形和密集建筑条件下gpu加速QES风洞模拟性能评价及灵敏度分析","authors":"Zhaoyang Wang , Sheng Fang , Li Yang , Xinpeng Li , Yixue Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate air dispersion modeling can effectively support nuclear accident emergency decision-making and emergency planning zone (EPZ) optimization, for improved safety and economic efficiency of advanced nuclear power plants (NPPs). However, fast and detailed air dispersion modeling remains challenging for heterogeneous terrain and dense building environments. This study presents the GPU-accelerated Quick Environmental Simulation (QES) system for simulating high-resolution wind and concentration field in the presence of heterogeneous terrain and dense buildings, and validates it against two wind tunnel experiments of an AP1000 site, evaluating wind direction, speed, and pollutant concentration in both horizontal and vertical profiles. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on solver options, number of released particles per second, non-local mixing coefficients, and grid sizes. The findings demonstrate that GPU-QES successfully reproduces the vortices between buildings and takes only 4 s to simulate a detailed 3 km × 3 km wind field with 35 million grids. For wind fields, more than 50 % of the simulations were within a factor of two of the observations. For concentration fields, the fraction of simulations within a factor of two/five exceeds 51 % and 85 %, respectively, which are 21 % and 15 % higher than the acceptable lower limits, confirming QES's capability for small-scale modeling at this NPP site. Sensitivity analyses suggest the optimal parameters: global memory solver, released particles per second of 200, non-local mixing coefficients of 0.3 m<sup>2</sup>/s<sup>2</sup>, and grid size of 5 m both horizontally and vertically in similar scenarios. For the site boundary that is important in determining EPZ, the GPU-QES is only 49 % lower than the measurement, whereas the straight-line Gaussian plume model overestimates by 8.23 times, proving GPU-QES's potential in optimizing the EPZ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 105875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation and sensitivity analysis of GPU-accelerated QES against wind tunnel experiments for air dispersion modeling under heterogeneous terrain and dense building at an AP1000 NPP site\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoyang Wang , Sheng Fang , Li Yang , Xinpeng Li , Yixue Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate air dispersion modeling can effectively support nuclear accident emergency decision-making and emergency planning zone (EPZ) optimization, for improved safety and economic efficiency of advanced nuclear power plants (NPPs). However, fast and detailed air dispersion modeling remains challenging for heterogeneous terrain and dense building environments. This study presents the GPU-accelerated Quick Environmental Simulation (QES) system for simulating high-resolution wind and concentration field in the presence of heterogeneous terrain and dense buildings, and validates it against two wind tunnel experiments of an AP1000 site, evaluating wind direction, speed, and pollutant concentration in both horizontal and vertical profiles. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on solver options, number of released particles per second, non-local mixing coefficients, and grid sizes. The findings demonstrate that GPU-QES successfully reproduces the vortices between buildings and takes only 4 s to simulate a detailed 3 km × 3 km wind field with 35 million grids. For wind fields, more than 50 % of the simulations were within a factor of two of the observations. For concentration fields, the fraction of simulations within a factor of two/five exceeds 51 % and 85 %, respectively, which are 21 % and 15 % higher than the acceptable lower limits, confirming QES's capability for small-scale modeling at this NPP site. Sensitivity analyses suggest the optimal parameters: global memory solver, released particles per second of 200, non-local mixing coefficients of 0.3 m<sup>2</sup>/s<sup>2</sup>, and grid size of 5 m both horizontally and vertically in similar scenarios. For the site boundary that is important in determining EPZ, the GPU-QES is only 49 % lower than the measurement, whereas the straight-line Gaussian plume model overestimates by 8.23 times, proving GPU-QES's potential in optimizing the EPZ.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025002732\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025002732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance evaluation and sensitivity analysis of GPU-accelerated QES against wind tunnel experiments for air dispersion modeling under heterogeneous terrain and dense building at an AP1000 NPP site
Accurate air dispersion modeling can effectively support nuclear accident emergency decision-making and emergency planning zone (EPZ) optimization, for improved safety and economic efficiency of advanced nuclear power plants (NPPs). However, fast and detailed air dispersion modeling remains challenging for heterogeneous terrain and dense building environments. This study presents the GPU-accelerated Quick Environmental Simulation (QES) system for simulating high-resolution wind and concentration field in the presence of heterogeneous terrain and dense buildings, and validates it against two wind tunnel experiments of an AP1000 site, evaluating wind direction, speed, and pollutant concentration in both horizontal and vertical profiles. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on solver options, number of released particles per second, non-local mixing coefficients, and grid sizes. The findings demonstrate that GPU-QES successfully reproduces the vortices between buildings and takes only 4 s to simulate a detailed 3 km × 3 km wind field with 35 million grids. For wind fields, more than 50 % of the simulations were within a factor of two of the observations. For concentration fields, the fraction of simulations within a factor of two/five exceeds 51 % and 85 %, respectively, which are 21 % and 15 % higher than the acceptable lower limits, confirming QES's capability for small-scale modeling at this NPP site. Sensitivity analyses suggest the optimal parameters: global memory solver, released particles per second of 200, non-local mixing coefficients of 0.3 m2/s2, and grid size of 5 m both horizontally and vertically in similar scenarios. For the site boundary that is important in determining EPZ, the GPU-QES is only 49 % lower than the measurement, whereas the straight-line Gaussian plume model overestimates by 8.23 times, proving GPU-QES's potential in optimizing the EPZ.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.