{"title":"LIBRETTO-431患者报告的结果:一线Selpercatinib与Pembrolizumab联合化疗治疗RET融合阳性NSCLC","authors":"Caicun Zhou MD, PhD , Silvia Novello MD, PhD , Pilar Garrido MD, PhD , Christophe Dooms MD, PhD , Jorge Alatorre-Alexander MD , Niels Reinmuth MD , Gill Worthy PhD , Kim Cocks PhD , Justin Williams PhD , Hongmei Han MS, MApSt , Minji K. Uh PhD , Nalin Payakachat PhD , Adrienne M. Gilligan PhD , Koichi Goto MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The benefit of first-line selpercatinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in patients with advanced <em>RET</em> fusion-positive NSCLC has been previously reported. The patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the LIBRETTO-431 trial presented here further support the benefit of first-line selpercatinib in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the intention-to-treat pembrolizumab population, 129 patients received selpercatinib and 83 patients received platinum chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (control). Time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ) total score was a secondary end point. Additional PROs included changes in the NSCLC-SAQ total and individual symptom scores, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire health-related quality of life, functioning and symptoms, patient-reported tolerability by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy GP5 item (GP5), and symptomatic adverse events by PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events up to 1 year were reported. TTCD was defined as the time from randomization to first deterioration in score that met prespecified thresholds, confirmed at next assessment. Patient-reported tolerability was reported as the proportion of patients with side effect bother over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Selpercatinib delayed TTCD of all individual NSCLC-SAQ symptoms versus control. A clinically meaningful improvement in the NSCLC-SAQ total score (mean difference = −2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.94 to −1.05) was also observed at 1 year for selpercatinib versus control. Selpercatinib delayed TTCD of physical (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38–0.76) and role (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.93) functioning measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, with significantly improved physical functioning at 1 year versus control (mean difference = 8.09, 95% CI: 2.82–13.37; <em>p</em> = 0.003). The selpercatinib group reported better tolerability, as measured by GP5, with a lower proportion bothered by side effects compared with control (22.6% versus 39.7%, OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.33–0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These PROs, combined with the established efficacy and safety profile of selpercatinib, further support the use of first-line selpercatinib as a standard of care and highlight the importance of early and comprehensive genomic testing in patients with <em>RET</em> fusion-positive NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 7","pages":"Article 100814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcomes From LIBRETTO-431: First-Line Selpercatinib Versus Chemotherapy With Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC\",\"authors\":\"Caicun Zhou MD, PhD , Silvia Novello MD, PhD , Pilar Garrido MD, PhD , Christophe Dooms MD, PhD , Jorge Alatorre-Alexander MD , Niels Reinmuth MD , Gill Worthy PhD , Kim Cocks PhD , Justin Williams PhD , Hongmei Han MS, MApSt , Minji K. Uh PhD , Nalin Payakachat PhD , Adrienne M. Gilligan PhD , Koichi Goto MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The benefit of first-line selpercatinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in patients with advanced <em>RET</em> fusion-positive NSCLC has been previously reported. The patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the LIBRETTO-431 trial presented here further support the benefit of first-line selpercatinib in this patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the intention-to-treat pembrolizumab population, 129 patients received selpercatinib and 83 patients received platinum chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (control). Time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ) total score was a secondary end point. Additional PROs included changes in the NSCLC-SAQ total and individual symptom scores, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire health-related quality of life, functioning and symptoms, patient-reported tolerability by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy GP5 item (GP5), and symptomatic adverse events by PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events up to 1 year were reported. TTCD was defined as the time from randomization to first deterioration in score that met prespecified thresholds, confirmed at next assessment. Patient-reported tolerability was reported as the proportion of patients with side effect bother over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Selpercatinib delayed TTCD of all individual NSCLC-SAQ symptoms versus control. A clinically meaningful improvement in the NSCLC-SAQ total score (mean difference = −2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.94 to −1.05) was also observed at 1 year for selpercatinib versus control. Selpercatinib delayed TTCD of physical (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38–0.76) and role (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.93) functioning measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, with significantly improved physical functioning at 1 year versus control (mean difference = 8.09, 95% CI: 2.82–13.37; <em>p</em> = 0.003). The selpercatinib group reported better tolerability, as measured by GP5, with a lower proportion bothered by side effects compared with control (22.6% versus 39.7%, OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.33–0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These PROs, combined with the established efficacy and safety profile of selpercatinib, further support the use of first-line selpercatinib as a standard of care and highlight the importance of early and comprehensive genomic testing in patients with <em>RET</em> fusion-positive NSCLC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 100814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266636432500030X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266636432500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-Reported Outcomes From LIBRETTO-431: First-Line Selpercatinib Versus Chemotherapy With Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC
Introduction
The benefit of first-line selpercatinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC has been previously reported. The patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the LIBRETTO-431 trial presented here further support the benefit of first-line selpercatinib in this patient population.
Methods
In the intention-to-treat pembrolizumab population, 129 patients received selpercatinib and 83 patients received platinum chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (control). Time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ) total score was a secondary end point. Additional PROs included changes in the NSCLC-SAQ total and individual symptom scores, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire health-related quality of life, functioning and symptoms, patient-reported tolerability by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy GP5 item (GP5), and symptomatic adverse events by PROs version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events up to 1 year were reported. TTCD was defined as the time from randomization to first deterioration in score that met prespecified thresholds, confirmed at next assessment. Patient-reported tolerability was reported as the proportion of patients with side effect bother over time.
Results
Selpercatinib delayed TTCD of all individual NSCLC-SAQ symptoms versus control. A clinically meaningful improvement in the NSCLC-SAQ total score (mean difference = −2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.94 to −1.05) was also observed at 1 year for selpercatinib versus control. Selpercatinib delayed TTCD of physical (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38–0.76) and role (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.93) functioning measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, with significantly improved physical functioning at 1 year versus control (mean difference = 8.09, 95% CI: 2.82–13.37; p = 0.003). The selpercatinib group reported better tolerability, as measured by GP5, with a lower proportion bothered by side effects compared with control (22.6% versus 39.7%, OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.33–0.99).
Conclusions
These PROs, combined with the established efficacy and safety profile of selpercatinib, further support the use of first-line selpercatinib as a standard of care and highlight the importance of early and comprehensive genomic testing in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.