中国对外投资对双边出口的影响建模:“一带一路”倡议的动机

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS
Oleksandr Rogach , Oleksii Chugaiev , Oleksandr Shnyrkov
{"title":"中国对外投资对双边出口的影响建模:“一带一路”倡议的动机","authors":"Oleksandr Rogach ,&nbsp;Oleksii Chugaiev ,&nbsp;Oleksandr Shnyrkov","doi":"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper aims to estimate how outward investment activity of China affects its bilateral exports at the aggregate and sectoral level in the period of recovery from the pandemic crisis. Theoretical discussion about the channels of the effect is complemented with empirical analysis (correlation and regression analysis). China's exports and outward investments relatively its partner's GNI are used as the main variables together with several control variables. Nonparametric correlation, alternative definitions of foreign direct investments, exclusion of outliers and weighting cases were used for robustness check. Sector-specific models were created for the main exported products. There is a negative non-linear dependence of Chinese exports on distance to markets, which provides a confirmation of proximity-concentration trade off theory. The diminishing negative effect of distance suggests existence of fixed costs of exports regardless the distance, which can be potentially decreased by investment in logistical facilities or trade liberalization. Large China's outward investment projects lead to a lasting positive effect on China's bilateral exports: each 1 % of partner's GNI accumulated investments by China in its trade partner increases bilateral exports of China there by 0.05–0.2 % of partner's GNI. But the regularity is irrelevant for exports of fuels, electronic and electrical appliances. This provides a partial support for Kojima's hypothesis and Vernon's product life cycle model (in particular rising labor costs lead to reallocation of some production abroad resulting in structural changes in exports). The general positive effect of free trade areas (additional exports equivalent to 2–3 % of partner's GNI) and the negative effect of a trade partner's economy size are not robust across time. Multilateral trade balances in partner countries do not affect significantly exports of China. This evidences in favor of high competitiveness of Chinese exports even in protected foreign markets and in strong economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45011,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Corporations Review","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 200130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the effect of Chinese outward investments on its bilateral exports: Motivation for Belt and Road Initiative\",\"authors\":\"Oleksandr Rogach ,&nbsp;Oleksii Chugaiev ,&nbsp;Oleksandr Shnyrkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The paper aims to estimate how outward investment activity of China affects its bilateral exports at the aggregate and sectoral level in the period of recovery from the pandemic crisis. Theoretical discussion about the channels of the effect is complemented with empirical analysis (correlation and regression analysis). China's exports and outward investments relatively its partner's GNI are used as the main variables together with several control variables. Nonparametric correlation, alternative definitions of foreign direct investments, exclusion of outliers and weighting cases were used for robustness check. Sector-specific models were created for the main exported products. There is a negative non-linear dependence of Chinese exports on distance to markets, which provides a confirmation of proximity-concentration trade off theory. The diminishing negative effect of distance suggests existence of fixed costs of exports regardless the distance, which can be potentially decreased by investment in logistical facilities or trade liberalization. Large China's outward investment projects lead to a lasting positive effect on China's bilateral exports: each 1 % of partner's GNI accumulated investments by China in its trade partner increases bilateral exports of China there by 0.05–0.2 % of partner's GNI. But the regularity is irrelevant for exports of fuels, electronic and electrical appliances. This provides a partial support for Kojima's hypothesis and Vernon's product life cycle model (in particular rising labor costs lead to reallocation of some production abroad resulting in structural changes in exports). The general positive effect of free trade areas (additional exports equivalent to 2–3 % of partner's GNI) and the negative effect of a trade partner's economy size are not robust across time. Multilateral trade balances in partner countries do not affect significantly exports of China. This evidences in favor of high competitiveness of Chinese exports even in protected foreign markets and in strong economies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Corporations Review\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 200130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Corporations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1925209925000233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Corporations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1925209925000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在估计中国对外投资活动在大流行危机恢复期对双边出口总量和行业层面的影响。对影响渠道的理论探讨辅以实证分析(相关分析和回归分析)。本文以中国的出口和对外投资相对于其合作伙伴的国民总收入为主要变量,并结合几个控制变量。使用非参数相关性、外国直接投资的替代定义、排除异常值和加权情况进行稳健性检查。为主要出口产品建立了特定行业的模型。中国出口与市场距离呈负非线性关系,证实了“接近-集中”权衡理论。距离的负面影响逐渐减弱表明,无论距离如何,出口都存在固定成本,这可以通过对物流设施或贸易自由化的投资而潜在地减少。中国的大型对外投资项目对中国的双边出口产生了持久的积极影响:中国对其贸易伙伴的累计投资每增加1%,中国对其贸易伙伴的双边出口就会增加0.05 - 0.2%。但这一规律与燃料、电子和电器的出口无关。这为Kojima的假设和Vernon的产品生命周期模型提供了部分支持(特别是劳动力成本上升导致一些生产在国外重新配置,从而导致出口的结构性变化)。自由贸易区的总体积极影响(相当于贸易伙伴国民总收入的2 - 3%的额外出口)和贸易伙伴经济规模的负面影响在时间上并不强劲。伙伴国家的多边贸易平衡对中国的出口没有显著影响。这证明即使在受保护的外国市场和经济强劲的国家,中国出口产品也具有很高的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling the effect of Chinese outward investments on its bilateral exports: Motivation for Belt and Road Initiative
The paper aims to estimate how outward investment activity of China affects its bilateral exports at the aggregate and sectoral level in the period of recovery from the pandemic crisis. Theoretical discussion about the channels of the effect is complemented with empirical analysis (correlation and regression analysis). China's exports and outward investments relatively its partner's GNI are used as the main variables together with several control variables. Nonparametric correlation, alternative definitions of foreign direct investments, exclusion of outliers and weighting cases were used for robustness check. Sector-specific models were created for the main exported products. There is a negative non-linear dependence of Chinese exports on distance to markets, which provides a confirmation of proximity-concentration trade off theory. The diminishing negative effect of distance suggests existence of fixed costs of exports regardless the distance, which can be potentially decreased by investment in logistical facilities or trade liberalization. Large China's outward investment projects lead to a lasting positive effect on China's bilateral exports: each 1 % of partner's GNI accumulated investments by China in its trade partner increases bilateral exports of China there by 0.05–0.2 % of partner's GNI. But the regularity is irrelevant for exports of fuels, electronic and electrical appliances. This provides a partial support for Kojima's hypothesis and Vernon's product life cycle model (in particular rising labor costs lead to reallocation of some production abroad resulting in structural changes in exports). The general positive effect of free trade areas (additional exports equivalent to 2–3 % of partner's GNI) and the negative effect of a trade partner's economy size are not robust across time. Multilateral trade balances in partner countries do not affect significantly exports of China. This evidences in favor of high competitiveness of Chinese exports even in protected foreign markets and in strong economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信