导管消融后房颤复发:我们的困惑和我们需要的碎片。

IF 1.3
Panayotis K Vlachakis, Anastasios Apostolos, Panagiotis Theofilis, Paschalis Karakasis, Ioanna Koniari, Athanasios Kordalis, George Leventopoulos, Maria Drakopoulou, Ioannis Leontsinis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Skevos Sideris, Costas Tsioufis
{"title":"导管消融后房颤复发:我们的困惑和我们需要的碎片。","authors":"Panayotis K Vlachakis, Anastasios Apostolos, Panagiotis Theofilis, Paschalis Karakasis, Ioanna Koniari, Athanasios Kordalis, George Leventopoulos, Maria Drakopoulou, Ioannis Leontsinis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Skevos Sideris, Costas Tsioufis","doi":"10.1111/pace.15221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (Afib) recurrence following catheter ablation (CA) remains a significant challenge within the electrophysiology community, potentially driven by complex mechanisms and diverse patient characteristics. Although multiple predictors of recurrence have been investigated, only a limited number have been consistently validated across studies, suggesting uncertainty in their predictive reliability. Advances in ablation techniques, such as pulsed-field ablation, may offer improved outcomes compared to traditional methods, though their long-term efficacy awaits further confirmation. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, alongside selective pharmacotherapies, appears to enhance ablation success, yet optimal strategies remain under exploration. Post-recurrence interventions, such as timely cardioversion or early reablation, could improve rhythm control, but their benefits depend on refined patient selection and timing. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and advanced mapping, hold potential to refine risk stratification and procedural precision, pending robust validation. Comprehensive approaches integrating lifestyle interventions, procedural innovations, and individualized care seem essential for optimizing Afib management. Addressing these gaps may provide the critical pieces needed to solve the puzzle of Afib recurrence after CA.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: The Puzzle We Have and the Pieces We Need.\",\"authors\":\"Panayotis K Vlachakis, Anastasios Apostolos, Panagiotis Theofilis, Paschalis Karakasis, Ioanna Koniari, Athanasios Kordalis, George Leventopoulos, Maria Drakopoulou, Ioannis Leontsinis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Skevos Sideris, Costas Tsioufis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (Afib) recurrence following catheter ablation (CA) remains a significant challenge within the electrophysiology community, potentially driven by complex mechanisms and diverse patient characteristics. Although multiple predictors of recurrence have been investigated, only a limited number have been consistently validated across studies, suggesting uncertainty in their predictive reliability. Advances in ablation techniques, such as pulsed-field ablation, may offer improved outcomes compared to traditional methods, though their long-term efficacy awaits further confirmation. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, alongside selective pharmacotherapies, appears to enhance ablation success, yet optimal strategies remain under exploration. Post-recurrence interventions, such as timely cardioversion or early reablation, could improve rhythm control, but their benefits depend on refined patient selection and timing. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and advanced mapping, hold potential to refine risk stratification and procedural precision, pending robust validation. Comprehensive approaches integrating lifestyle interventions, procedural innovations, and individualized care seem essential for optimizing Afib management. Addressing these gaps may provide the critical pieces needed to solve the puzzle of Afib recurrence after CA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导管消融(CA)后心房颤动(Afib)复发仍然是电生理学界的一个重大挑战,可能是由复杂的机制和不同的患者特征驱动的。虽然已经研究了多种复发预测因子,但只有有限数量的预测因子在研究中得到了一致的验证,这表明其预测可靠性存在不确定性。与传统方法相比,诸如脉冲场消融等消融技术的进步可能提供更好的结果,但其长期疗效有待进一步证实。积极管理可改变的危险因素,并辅以选择性药物治疗,似乎可以提高消融成功率,但最佳策略仍在探索中。复发后的干预措施,如及时的心律转复或早期再消融,可以改善心律控制,但其益处取决于精确的患者选择和时机。新兴技术,包括人工智能和先进的地图,有可能完善风险分层和程序精度,有待于强有力的验证。综合生活方式干预、程序创新和个性化护理的综合方法似乎对优化房颤管理至关重要。解决这些空白可能提供解决CA后房颤复发难题所需的关键部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: The Puzzle We Have and the Pieces We Need.

Atrial fibrillation (Afib) recurrence following catheter ablation (CA) remains a significant challenge within the electrophysiology community, potentially driven by complex mechanisms and diverse patient characteristics. Although multiple predictors of recurrence have been investigated, only a limited number have been consistently validated across studies, suggesting uncertainty in their predictive reliability. Advances in ablation techniques, such as pulsed-field ablation, may offer improved outcomes compared to traditional methods, though their long-term efficacy awaits further confirmation. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, alongside selective pharmacotherapies, appears to enhance ablation success, yet optimal strategies remain under exploration. Post-recurrence interventions, such as timely cardioversion or early reablation, could improve rhythm control, but their benefits depend on refined patient selection and timing. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and advanced mapping, hold potential to refine risk stratification and procedural precision, pending robust validation. Comprehensive approaches integrating lifestyle interventions, procedural innovations, and individualized care seem essential for optimizing Afib management. Addressing these gaps may provide the critical pieces needed to solve the puzzle of Afib recurrence after CA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信