增强神经外科手术后的恢复。

IF 2.1
Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001510
Robert Canelli, Paul Karim, Federico Bilotta
{"title":"增强神经外科手术后的恢复。","authors":"Robert Canelli, Paul Karim, Federico Bilotta","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach to the surgical patient optimizes perioperative care to improve outcomes and facilitate recovery. Despite the success of ERAS in many surgical specialties, neurosurgery has been reluctant to adopt ERAS. The aim of this review was to examine recently published ERAS protocols for elective neurosurgical procedures with a focus on brain and spine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There were few ERAS protocols published for brain and spine surgery in comparison to other surgical specialties. ERAS elements specific to brain surgery seem to address thromboprophylaxis planning, antiepileptic management, steroid administration, strict blood pressure control, and avoidance of mannitol. When implemented, protocols have yielded similar results to protocols for other surgical specialties, including reduced morbidity, hospital length of stay, and health care cost. However, widespread implementation was limited by difficulties in obtaining a consensus agreement on ERAS elements to include, achieving adoption across neurosurgeons, and protocol adherence.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While the adoption of ERAS in neurosurgery remains limited, emerging evidence supports its feasibility and effectiveness, particularly in reducing hospitalization costs and postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"553-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced recovery after neurosurgery.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Canelli, Paul Karim, Federico Bilotta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach to the surgical patient optimizes perioperative care to improve outcomes and facilitate recovery. Despite the success of ERAS in many surgical specialties, neurosurgery has been reluctant to adopt ERAS. The aim of this review was to examine recently published ERAS protocols for elective neurosurgical procedures with a focus on brain and spine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There were few ERAS protocols published for brain and spine surgery in comparison to other surgical specialties. ERAS elements specific to brain surgery seem to address thromboprophylaxis planning, antiepileptic management, steroid administration, strict blood pressure control, and avoidance of mannitol. When implemented, protocols have yielded similar results to protocols for other surgical specialties, including reduced morbidity, hospital length of stay, and health care cost. However, widespread implementation was limited by difficulties in obtaining a consensus agreement on ERAS elements to include, achieving adoption across neurosurgeons, and protocol adherence.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While the adoption of ERAS in neurosurgery remains limited, emerging evidence supports its feasibility and effectiveness, particularly in reducing hospitalization costs and postoperative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"553-557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方法优化围手术期护理,改善预后,促进恢复。尽管ERAS在许多外科专科取得了成功,但神经外科一直不愿采用ERAS。本综述的目的是研究最近发表的选择性神经外科手术的ERAS方案,重点是脑和脊柱手术。最近的发现:与其他外科专业相比,脑外科和脊柱外科的ERAS方案发表的很少。脑外科特定的ERAS元素似乎解决了血栓预防计划、抗癫痫管理、类固醇管理、严格的血压控制和避免使用甘露醇。实施后,该方案产生了与其他外科专科方案相似的结果,包括降低发病率、住院时间和医疗保健成本。然而,由于难以就ERAS的要素达成共识,难以在神经外科医生之间实现采用,难以遵守协议,因此限制了ERAS的广泛实施。摘要:虽然ERAS在神经外科中的应用仍然有限,但新出现的证据支持其可行性和有效性,特别是在减少住院费用和术后并发症方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced recovery after neurosurgery.

Purpose of review: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach to the surgical patient optimizes perioperative care to improve outcomes and facilitate recovery. Despite the success of ERAS in many surgical specialties, neurosurgery has been reluctant to adopt ERAS. The aim of this review was to examine recently published ERAS protocols for elective neurosurgical procedures with a focus on brain and spine surgeries.

Recent findings: There were few ERAS protocols published for brain and spine surgery in comparison to other surgical specialties. ERAS elements specific to brain surgery seem to address thromboprophylaxis planning, antiepileptic management, steroid administration, strict blood pressure control, and avoidance of mannitol. When implemented, protocols have yielded similar results to protocols for other surgical specialties, including reduced morbidity, hospital length of stay, and health care cost. However, widespread implementation was limited by difficulties in obtaining a consensus agreement on ERAS elements to include, achieving adoption across neurosurgeons, and protocol adherence.

Summary: While the adoption of ERAS in neurosurgery remains limited, emerging evidence supports its feasibility and effectiveness, particularly in reducing hospitalization costs and postoperative complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信