系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病的治疗选择,两个国际研究小组的调查。

Michael Macklin, Iazsmin Bauer Ventura, Dinesh Khanna
{"title":"系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病的治疗选择,两个国际研究小组的调查。","authors":"Michael Macklin, Iazsmin Bauer Ventura, Dinesh Khanna","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Options for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have evolved rapidly. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has replaced cyclophosphamide (CYC) in most cases of SSc-ILD, with the recent addition of tocilizumab (TCZ) in SSc-ILD as well. Combination immunosuppressive (CI) therapy with rituximab (RTX) and MMF, along with the antifibrotic nintedanib, have also become options. We aimed to better understand prescribing patterns and examine treatment trends overall to examine guideline penetrance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey polling international SSc experts was conducted from October 2023 through March 2024 by members of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium and the European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MMF was the most common first-line treatment (92%) for SSc-ILD, followed by a split preference for RTX or TCZ for second/third line. Most experts add an antifibrotic (57%) or use CI therapy (24%) with failure of initial therapy. When CI therapy is used, MMF/RTX is used most (71%), followed by MMF/TCZ (38%). Corticosteroids were used for SSc-ILD treatment by 36% of experts, with 12% of these respondents using greater than 20 mg of prednisone equivalent. The survey response rate was 17.4% of total centers and 7.7% of total experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line treatment preferences are in line with current treatment guidelines. CI therapy is not typically used, although the EVER-ILD trial might have influenced prescribing patterns with RTX/MMF CI therapy more typical. Prednisone use was more common than expected. Further studies evaluating combination MMF/TCZ versus MMF/RTX and whether TCZ is effective for SSc-ILD in patients without an inflammatory laboratory profile are necessary to help guide clinical practice. Further adoption of current guidelines may also change prednisone use patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":520664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Choices in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease, a Survey of 2 International Research Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Macklin, Iazsmin Bauer Ventura, Dinesh Khanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Options for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have evolved rapidly. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has replaced cyclophosphamide (CYC) in most cases of SSc-ILD, with the recent addition of tocilizumab (TCZ) in SSc-ILD as well. Combination immunosuppressive (CI) therapy with rituximab (RTX) and MMF, along with the antifibrotic nintedanib, have also become options. We aimed to better understand prescribing patterns and examine treatment trends overall to examine guideline penetrance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey polling international SSc experts was conducted from October 2023 through March 2024 by members of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium and the European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MMF was the most common first-line treatment (92%) for SSc-ILD, followed by a split preference for RTX or TCZ for second/third line. Most experts add an antifibrotic (57%) or use CI therapy (24%) with failure of initial therapy. When CI therapy is used, MMF/RTX is used most (71%), followed by MMF/TCZ (38%). Corticosteroids were used for SSc-ILD treatment by 36% of experts, with 12% of these respondents using greater than 20 mg of prednisone equivalent. The survey response rate was 17.4% of total centers and 7.7% of total experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line treatment preferences are in line with current treatment guidelines. CI therapy is not typically used, although the EVER-ILD trial might have influenced prescribing patterns with RTX/MMF CI therapy more typical. Prednisone use was more common than expected. Further studies evaluating combination MMF/TCZ versus MMF/RTX and whether TCZ is effective for SSc-ILD in patients without an inflammatory laboratory profile are necessary to help guide clinical practice. Further adoption of current guidelines may also change prednisone use patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病(SSc-ILD)的治疗方案发展迅速。在大多数SSc-ILD病例中,霉酚酸酯(MMF)已经取代了环磷酰胺(CYC),最近在SSc-ILD中也加入了托珠单抗(TCZ)。利妥昔单抗(RTX)和MMF联合免疫抑制(CI)治疗以及抗纤维化药物尼达尼也已成为选择。我们的目的是更好地了解处方模式和检查总体治疗趋势,以检查指南的外显性。方法:从2023年10月到2024年3月,由硬皮病临床试验联盟和欧洲硬皮病试验和研究小组的成员对国际硬皮病专家进行了一项调查。结果:MMF是SSc-ILD最常见的一线治疗(92%),其次是RTX或TCZ的二线/三线治疗。大多数专家在初始治疗失败后增加抗纤维化治疗(57%)或使用CI治疗(24%)。当使用CI治疗时,MMF/RTX使用最多(71%),其次是MMF/TCZ(38%)。36%的专家使用皮质类固醇治疗SSc-ILD,其中12%的受访者使用大于20mg的泼尼松当量。调查回复率为17.4%的中心和7.7%的专家。结论:一线治疗方案符合目前的治疗指南。尽管EVER-ILD试验可能影响了RTX/MMF CI治疗更典型的处方模式,但CI治疗并不典型。强的松的使用比预期的更普遍。有必要进一步研究MMF/TCZ联合治疗与MMF/RTX联合治疗,以及TCZ对无炎症实验室特征的SSc-ILD患者是否有效,以帮助指导临床实践。进一步采用现行指南也可能改变强的松的使用模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic Choices in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease, a Survey of 2 International Research Groups.

Background/objective: Options for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have evolved rapidly. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has replaced cyclophosphamide (CYC) in most cases of SSc-ILD, with the recent addition of tocilizumab (TCZ) in SSc-ILD as well. Combination immunosuppressive (CI) therapy with rituximab (RTX) and MMF, along with the antifibrotic nintedanib, have also become options. We aimed to better understand prescribing patterns and examine treatment trends overall to examine guideline penetrance.

Methods: A survey polling international SSc experts was conducted from October 2023 through March 2024 by members of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium and the European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group.

Results: MMF was the most common first-line treatment (92%) for SSc-ILD, followed by a split preference for RTX or TCZ for second/third line. Most experts add an antifibrotic (57%) or use CI therapy (24%) with failure of initial therapy. When CI therapy is used, MMF/RTX is used most (71%), followed by MMF/TCZ (38%). Corticosteroids were used for SSc-ILD treatment by 36% of experts, with 12% of these respondents using greater than 20 mg of prednisone equivalent. The survey response rate was 17.4% of total centers and 7.7% of total experts.

Conclusion: First-line treatment preferences are in line with current treatment guidelines. CI therapy is not typically used, although the EVER-ILD trial might have influenced prescribing patterns with RTX/MMF CI therapy more typical. Prednisone use was more common than expected. Further studies evaluating combination MMF/TCZ versus MMF/RTX and whether TCZ is effective for SSc-ILD in patients without an inflammatory laboratory profile are necessary to help guide clinical practice. Further adoption of current guidelines may also change prednisone use patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信