{"title":"一种测量磨牙患者颅颈屈曲试验的新试验方案和装置。","authors":"Mareile Jung, Annika Zind, Markus J Ernst","doi":"10.33393/aop.2025.3448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) has been proposed to assess muscular stabilization using deep neck flexors. Reliability of the CCFT using a pressure biofeedback unit has been regarded as doubtful, and the level of evidence is reportedly low.The aim of the current study is to pilot test an alternative measurement protocol by using a new digital device during the staged CCFT when compared to surface electromyography (sEMG) of neck flexor muscles in participants with bruxism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional pilot study including five participants with bruxism and five controls. Measuring five incremental stages (20-100%), from a maximum force of 17 N for the CCFT and parallel to sEMG measurements of bilateral sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) and masseter muscles. SEMG data were normalized to their activity during maximal voluntary contraction. Performance during the staged CCFT was fed back via a smartphone screen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-way repeated measures ANOVA found a significant stage (F = 32.56, df = 4, p = 0.001) but not group (0.30, df = 1, p = 0.65) main effect for SCM activity, with both groups demonstrating higher normalized sEMG activity for incremental stages of the CCFT. Neither group nor stage effects were found for normalized masseter activity during the staged CCFT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A new measurement protocol and test device for the CCFT were examined in participants with and without bruxism. In parallel, sEMG used showed differences in SCM activity for incremental test stages. Group differences could not be found.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"138-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new test protocol and device for measuring the cranio-cervical flexion test in participants with bruxism.\",\"authors\":\"Mareile Jung, Annika Zind, Markus J Ernst\",\"doi\":\"10.33393/aop.2025.3448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) has been proposed to assess muscular stabilization using deep neck flexors. Reliability of the CCFT using a pressure biofeedback unit has been regarded as doubtful, and the level of evidence is reportedly low.The aim of the current study is to pilot test an alternative measurement protocol by using a new digital device during the staged CCFT when compared to surface electromyography (sEMG) of neck flexor muscles in participants with bruxism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional pilot study including five participants with bruxism and five controls. Measuring five incremental stages (20-100%), from a maximum force of 17 N for the CCFT and parallel to sEMG measurements of bilateral sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) and masseter muscles. SEMG data were normalized to their activity during maximal voluntary contraction. Performance during the staged CCFT was fed back via a smartphone screen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-way repeated measures ANOVA found a significant stage (F = 32.56, df = 4, p = 0.001) but not group (0.30, df = 1, p = 0.65) main effect for SCM activity, with both groups demonstrating higher normalized sEMG activity for incremental stages of the CCFT. Neither group nor stage effects were found for normalized masseter activity during the staged CCFT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A new measurement protocol and test device for the CCFT were examined in participants with and without bruxism. In parallel, sEMG used showed differences in SCM activity for incremental test stages. Group differences could not be found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"138-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2025.3448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
颅颈屈曲试验(CCFT)已被提议用于评估使用深颈屈肌的肌肉稳定性。使用压力生物反馈装置的CCFT的可靠性一直被认为是值得怀疑的,据报道证据水平很低。当前研究的目的是通过在分阶段CCFT期间使用新的数字设备,与磨牙患者颈部屈肌的表面肌电图(sEMG)进行比较,对一种替代测量方案进行试点测试。方法:横断面试验,包括5名磨牙患者和5名对照组。测量5个渐进阶段(20-100%),CCFT的最大力为17牛,平行于双侧胸锁乳突肌(SCM)和咬肌的肌电图测量。表面肌电信号数据归一化到最大自愿收缩时的活动。在阶段性CCFT期间的表现通过智能手机屏幕反馈。结果:双向重复测量方差分析发现,阶段(F = 32.56, df = 4, p = 0.001)对SCM活动有显著的主要影响,但组(0.30,df = 1, p = 0.65)对SCM活动没有显著的主要影响,两组在CCFT的渐进阶段均表现出更高的规范化肌电活动。在分阶段CCFT期间,没有发现组效应和阶段效应对标准化咬肌活动的影响。结论:在有磨牙和无磨牙的受试者中,研究了一种新的CCFT测量方案和测试装置。同时,肌电图显示了增量测试阶段中SCM活动的差异。没有发现组间差异。
A new test protocol and device for measuring the cranio-cervical flexion test in participants with bruxism.
Introduction: The craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) has been proposed to assess muscular stabilization using deep neck flexors. Reliability of the CCFT using a pressure biofeedback unit has been regarded as doubtful, and the level of evidence is reportedly low.The aim of the current study is to pilot test an alternative measurement protocol by using a new digital device during the staged CCFT when compared to surface electromyography (sEMG) of neck flexor muscles in participants with bruxism.
Methods: Cross-sectional pilot study including five participants with bruxism and five controls. Measuring five incremental stages (20-100%), from a maximum force of 17 N for the CCFT and parallel to sEMG measurements of bilateral sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) and masseter muscles. SEMG data were normalized to their activity during maximal voluntary contraction. Performance during the staged CCFT was fed back via a smartphone screen.
Results: A two-way repeated measures ANOVA found a significant stage (F = 32.56, df = 4, p = 0.001) but not group (0.30, df = 1, p = 0.65) main effect for SCM activity, with both groups demonstrating higher normalized sEMG activity for incremental stages of the CCFT. Neither group nor stage effects were found for normalized masseter activity during the staged CCFT.
Conclusion: A new measurement protocol and test device for the CCFT were examined in participants with and without bruxism. In parallel, sEMG used showed differences in SCM activity for incremental test stages. Group differences could not be found.