脑损伤康复出院后3个月和6个月的服务接入网络:自我-网络分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg
{"title":"脑损伤康复出院后3个月和6个月的服务接入网络:自我-网络分析。","authors":"Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service access networks at 3- and 6-months after discharge from brain injury rehabilitation: an ego-network analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从获得性脑损伤患者的角度绘制急性期后3个月和6个月的康复和医疗网络,并研究这些与专业过渡康复服务的资金提供和参与之间的关系。材料和方法:15例成人获得性脑损伤(平均年龄43岁;范围20-63)在康复出院后3个月和6个月参加了半结构化电话访谈,共进行了29次访谈。访谈指南基于一个社会网络框架,获得了关于网络的组成、规模、密度和稳定性的数据。结果:结果表明,参与者的网络范围为3-10名卫生专业人员。五种类型包括内聚型、集群型、核心型、星型和风筝网。在出院后6个月,参与者网络的大小和密度普遍下降。参与者的网络是不同的,当比较那些由国家伤害保险计划-昆士兰和国家残疾保险计划资助的人和那些有或没有参加过渡康复服务的人时,观察到网络测量的差异。结论:本研究在评估个人人际网络的组成和结构特征时,突出了个人人际网络的多样性。通过研究,对现有资金和项目框架下的网络和个人提供服务的经验有了更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Service access networks at 3- and 6-months after discharge from brain injury rehabilitation: an ego-network analysis.

Purpose: To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.

Materials and methods: Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.

Results: Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.

Conclusions: The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信